Connect with us

International

Hot Penny Stocks On Robinhood To Watch Before Next Month

Are These Penny Stocks on Your March Watchlist?
The post Hot Penny Stocks On Robinhood To Watch Before Next Month appeared first on Penny Stocks to Buy, Picks, News and Information | PennyStocks.com.

Published

on

4 Penny Stocks to Watch as Stimulus Checks Roll In 

Markets were mixed at the open this morning, but it’s been a more bullish trend for penny stocks. In this case, let’s take a look at the Russell 2000 Small-Cap ETF (NYSE: IWM). As you’ll see, in tandem with other major indexes like the S&P 500 ETF (NYSE: SPY), both had pulled back during the early market hours. However, as the morning session rolled on, small-cap stocks began outpacing the S&P. This could be an indication of renewed interest in smaller companies in general.

Now that stimulus checks are rolling out, some expect younger traders to use the funds to pile into stocks. If one thing’s certain, it’s that retail traders aren’t shy about trading volatile stocks. So whether it’s been GameStop or any of the stocks under $5, we’ve found retail momentum fueling trends. One of these trends has been in small-cap technology and biotech stocks. I understand that many traders avoided broader tech stocks. This year has seen different trends take hold, with Robinhood traders flocking to certain small-cap names.

The Robinhood app has become one of the go-to’s for retail traders due to its ease of use. However, one thing to note about penny stocks on Robinhood is the majority of these stocks are only trading on the NASDAQ and NYSE. Is this a bad thing?

In my opinion, no, and let me explain why. When you’ve got OTC penny stocks, for instance, there are far fewer that have active trading consistently. There’s typically far more liquidity when it comes to listed penny stocks because more funds can trade them. With this in mind, here’s a quick list of penny stocks on Robinhood that have been turning heads this month.

Penny Stocks On Robinhood to Watch In March

GT Biopharma Inc.

Shares of GT Biopharma have been on the move for the better part of the last few weeks. In fact, since the March 5th lows of $3.90, GTBP stock has managed to bounce back as much as 74%. This week the biotech penny stock reached highs of $6.80. This is a level it hadn’t been at since mid-February. What’s more, the last time it was trading at that level, GTBP stock was on heading lower.

One of the big catalysts recently has been the company’s clinical trial progress. This month, the company added the University of Wisconsin-Madison Carbone Cancer Center as another site for its ongoing Phase 1/2 trials. In particular, these trials are focused on GT’s lead candidate, GTB-3550, for treating cancer. The treatment is based on the company’s novel TriKE treatment platform utilizing natural killer cell protein to boost the immune system.

This week, the company updated interim results in the trial for high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and refractory/relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In total, 9 patients have been enrolled. According to the company, early data showed GTB-3550 therapy demonstrated “significant bone marrow blast level reductions” in AML and MDS patients without the need for expensive progenitor-derived or autologous/allogenic cell therapies. 

“We believe as we continue to dose escalate GTB-3550 TriKE, more patients will experience greater clinical efficacy. TriKE’s ability to work in the patient without outside supplemental engineered NK cells or the need for any combination drugs, sets TriKE apart from other cancer therapies. This is also the reason why TriKE therapy will be significantly less expensive than other treatments, opening the door to an off-the-shelf therapeutic.”

Anthony Cataldo, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of GT Biopharma.

This platform has been a major point of focus in March. In addition to GTB-3550, its ROR1 TriKE for prostate cancer showed positive preclinical results as well. With strong progress in its current clinical trial and continued expansion of its TriKE platform, will GTBP be one of the penny stocks on Robinhood to watch?

best robinhood penny stocks to watch GT Biopharma Inc. GTBP stock chart

Evolving Systems Inc. 

One of the more interesting communications penny stocks is Evolving Systems Inc. Evolving Systems provides tools for communications service providers or CSPs. Through its range of platforms, EVOL allows its customers to engage and activate a larger customer base. This includes customer retention, additions, and more. Its platforms include enhancements for digital sales and distribution, real-time data, customer value management, and more.

As you can see, EVOL works almost like a tech company in this specific market. Its services are used by over 90 providers across 60 countries around the world. With a footing in this many countries, Evolving Systems is expanding its reach in individual markets. 

On March 17th, EVOL announced its fourth quarter and year-end 2020 financial results. For the year, revenue came in at around $24.6 million. This is an increase of $0.6 million over the previous year. In addition to generating a positive cash flow, EVOL brought a positive EBITDA of $2.4 million for the year and $0.8 for the fourth quarter alone. This is substantial, and especially so considering the effects of the pandemic.

[Read More] Best Penny Stocks To Buy Now? These 4 Are Turning Heads

CEO of the company, Matthew Stecker, stated that “we have leveraged our ability to implement and provide support remotely and have noted a relatively limited effect on our operations during this time of a global pandemic. This has allowed us to overcome many challenges.” Stecker went on to state that the “Company has increased revenues and generated a profit for the year and for the fourth quarter.”

best robinhood penny stocks to watch Evolving Systems EVOL stock chart

CNS Pharmaceuticals Inc. 

CNS Pharmaceuticals is a biopharmaceutical company that is developing several novel therapeutics. This includes treatments for primary and metastatic brain cancers as well as CNS disorders. Currently, its leading product candidate is known as Berubicin. This is a treatment for glioblastoma multiforme or GBM. Currently, this type of cancer is considered to be incurable.

The substance was formerly studied in a Phase I trial by Reata Pharmaceuticals. It was then licensed by CNS Pharmaceuticals, which now holds an exclusive worldwide license on the chemical compound. Based on 11 patients, the drug showed a favorable response in 44% of candidates. This is highly encouraging, and now the company expects to start a Phase 2 trial this year.

Simultaneously, the drug is being studied in a Phase I trial in pediatric GBM patients in Poland. A few weeks ago, the company announced that it would begin enrolling patients in the Phase 2 study this month.

John Climaco, CEO of CNS, stated that “I am very pleased with our progress and the team’s execution towards the start of our program. We have made significant advancements and are now finalizing clinical site selection and preparing to begin patient screening, which we expect to commence next month.”

The company also presented at the Emerging Growth Virtual Conference on March 17th. So it will be interesting to see how the market takes to its recent developments and any new updates given at the conference.

best robinhood penny stocks to watch CNS Pharmaceuticals CNSP stock chart

Brickell Biotech Inc. 

Brickell Biotech is a clinical-stage pharmaceutical company working on therapeutics for skin diseases. This includes a focus on using its lead asset, sofpironium bromide, for the treatment of hyperhidrosis. In a recent update, the company initiated a Phase 3 clinical program for this substance. On top of this, the company has also passed 50% enrollment in its upcoming Cardigan I and II studies. This could lead to an NDA submission to the FDA within the next year or so. On March 17th, two pieces of news concerning Brickell surfaced in the pre-market. Both are quite consequential for investors to consider. 

On the one hand, fillings showed that Brickell Biotech has registered for a $50 million common stock offering. This is quite common amongst biotech companies, but it is always big news when it breaks. While the details of when are still unknown, it will be interesting to see what the funding goes towards. Second, the CEO of Brickell, Robert Brown, reportedly purchased 100,000 shares at an average price of $1.18 in a recent Form 4 Filing.

[Read More] 5 Reddit Penny Stocks That Turned Stimulus Checks Into Big Money

Obviously, a CEO buying shares in their company is usually a positive sign. It inspires confidence in the market. Additionally, bulls always like to see actions like this taken by a CEO. While this news is exciting, we also have to consider the speculative effects of such. For now, however, BBI stock has continued trending higher during the second half of the week.

best robinhood penny stocks to watch Brickell Biotech Inc. BBI stock chart

Click Here For Full Disclaimer

The post Hot Penny Stocks On Robinhood To Watch Before Next Month appeared first on Penny Stocks to Buy, Picks, News and Information | PennyStocks.com.

Read More

Continue Reading

International

Illegal Immigrants Leave US Hospitals With Billions In Unpaid Bills

Illegal Immigrants Leave US Hospitals With Billions In Unpaid Bills

By Autumn Spredemann of The Epoch Times

Tens of thousands of illegal…

Published

on

Illegal Immigrants Leave US Hospitals With Billions In Unpaid Bills

By Autumn Spredemann of The Epoch Times

Tens of thousands of illegal immigrants are flooding into U.S. hospitals for treatment and leaving billions in uncompensated health care costs in their wake.

The House Committee on Homeland Security recently released a report illustrating that from the estimated $451 billion in annual costs stemming from the U.S. border crisis, a significant portion is going to health care for illegal immigrants.

With the majority of the illegal immigrant population lacking any kind of medical insurance, hospitals and government welfare programs such as Medicaid are feeling the weight of these unanticipated costs.

Apprehensions of illegal immigrants at the U.S. border have jumped 48 percent since the record in fiscal year 2021 and nearly tripled since fiscal year 2019, according to Customs and Border Protection data.

Last year broke a new record high for illegal border crossings, surpassing more than 3.2 million apprehensions.

And with that sea of humanity comes the need for health care and, in most cases, the inability to pay for it.

In January, CEO of Denver Health Donna Lynne told reporters that 8,000 illegal immigrants made roughly 20,000 visits to the city’s health system in 2023.

The total bill for uncompensated care costs last year to the system totaled $140 million, said Dane Roper, public information officer for Denver Health. More than $10 million of it was attributed to “care for new immigrants,” he told The Epoch Times.

Though the amount of debt assigned to illegal immigrants is a fraction of the total, uncompensated care costs in the Denver Health system have risen dramatically over the past few years.

The total uncompensated costs in 2020 came to $60 million, Mr. Roper said. In 2022, the number doubled, hitting $120 million.

He also said their city hospitals are treating issues such as “respiratory illnesses, GI [gastro-intenstinal] illnesses, dental disease, and some common chronic illnesses such as asthma and diabetes.”

“The perspective we’ve been trying to emphasize all along is that providing healthcare services for an influx of new immigrants who are unable to pay for their care is adding additional strain to an already significant uncompensated care burden,” Mr. Roper said.

He added this is why a local, state, and federal response to the needs of the new illegal immigrant population is “so important.”

Colorado is far from the only state struggling with a trail of unpaid hospital bills.

EMS medics with the Houston Fire Department transport a Mexican woman the hospital in Houston on Aug. 12, 2020. (John Moore/Getty Images)

Dr. Robert Trenschel, CEO of the Yuma Regional Medical Center situated on the Arizona–Mexico border, said on average, illegal immigrants cost up to three times more in human resources to resolve their cases and provide a safe discharge.

“Some [illegal] migrants come with minor ailments, but many of them come in with significant disease,” Dr. Trenschel said during a congressional hearing last year.

“We’ve had migrant patients on dialysis, cardiac catheterization, and in need of heart surgery. Many are very sick.”

He said many illegal immigrants who enter the country and need medical assistance end up staying in the ICU ward for 60 days or more.

A large portion of the patients are pregnant women who’ve had little to no prenatal treatment. This has resulted in an increase in babies being born that require neonatal care for 30 days or longer.

Dr. Trenschel told The Epoch Times last year that illegal immigrants were overrunning healthcare services in his town, leaving the hospital with $26 million in unpaid medical bills in just 12 months.

ER Duty to Care

The Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act of 1986 requires that public hospitals participating in Medicare “must medically screen all persons seeking emergency care … regardless of payment method or insurance status.”

The numbers are difficult to gauge as the policy position of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is that it “will not require hospital staff to ask patients directly about their citizenship or immigration status.”

In southern California, again close to the border with Mexico, some hospitals are struggling with an influx of illegal immigrants.

American patients are enduring longer wait times for doctor appointments due to a nursing shortage in the state, two health care professionals told The Epoch Times in January.

A health care worker at a hospital in Southern California, who asked not to be named for fear of losing her job, told The Epoch Times that “the entire health care system is just being bombarded” by a steady stream of illegal immigrants.

“Our healthcare system is so overwhelmed, and then add on top of that tuberculosis, COVID-19, and other diseases from all over the world,” she said.

A Salvadorian man is aided by medical workers after cutting his leg while trying to jump on a truck in Matias Romero, Mexico, on Nov. 2, 2018. (Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

A newly-enacted law in California provides free healthcare for all illegal immigrants residing in the state. The law could cost taxpayers between $3 billion and $6 billion per year, according to recent estimates by state and federal lawmakers.

In New York, where the illegal immigration crisis has manifested most notably beyond the southern border, city and state officials have long been accommodating of illegal immigrants’ healthcare costs.

Since June 2014, when then-mayor Bill de Blasio set up The Task Force on Immigrant Health Care Access, New York City has worked to expand avenues for illegal immigrants to get free health care.

“New York City has a moral duty to ensure that all its residents have meaningful access to needed health care, regardless of their immigration status or ability to pay,” Mr. de Blasio stated in a 2015 report.

The report notes that in 2013, nearly 64 percent of illegal immigrants were uninsured. Since then, tens of thousands of illegal immigrants have settled in the city.

“The uninsured rate for undocumented immigrants is more than three times that of other noncitizens in New York City (20 percent) and more than six times greater than the uninsured rate for the rest of the city (10 percent),” the report states.

The report states that because healthcare providers don’t ask patients about documentation status, the task force lacks “data specific to undocumented patients.”

Some health care providers say a big part of the issue is that without a clear path to insurance or payment for non-emergency services, illegal immigrants are going to the hospital due to a lack of options.

“It’s insane, and it has been for years at this point,” Dana, a Texas emergency room nurse who asked to have her full name omitted, told The Epoch Times.

Working for a major hospital system in the greater Houston area, Dana has seen “a zillion” migrants pass through under her watch with “no end in sight.” She said many who are illegal immigrants arrive with treatable illnesses that require simple antibiotics. “Not a lot of GPs [general practitioners] will see you if you can’t pay and don’t have insurance.”

She said the “undocumented crowd” tends to arrive with a lot of the same conditions. Many find their way to Houston not long after crossing the southern border. Some of the common health issues Dana encounters include dehydration, unhealed fractures, respiratory illnesses, stomach ailments, and pregnancy-related concerns.

“This isn’t a new problem, it’s just worse now,” Dana said.

Emergency room nurses and EMTs tend to patients in hallways at the Houston Methodist The Woodlands Hospital in Houston on Aug. 18, 2021. (Brandon Bell/Getty Images)

Medicaid Factor

One of the main government healthcare resources illegal immigrants use is Medicaid.

All those who don’t qualify for regular Medicaid are eligible for Emergency Medicaid, regardless of immigration status. By doing this, the program helps pay for the cost of uncompensated care bills at qualifying hospitals.

However, some loopholes allow access to the regular Medicaid benefits. “Qualified noncitizens” who haven’t been granted legal status within five years still qualify if they’re listed as a refugee, an asylum seeker, or a Cuban or Haitian national.

Yet the lion’s share of Medicaid usage by illegal immigrants still comes through state-level benefits and emergency medical treatment.

A Congressional report highlighted data from the CMS, which showed total Medicaid costs for “emergency services for undocumented aliens” in fiscal year 2021 surpassed $7 billion, and totaled more than $5 billion in fiscal 2022.

Both years represent a significant spike from the $3 billion in fiscal 2020.

An employee working with Medicaid who asked to be referred to only as Jennifer out of concern for her job, told The Epoch Times that at a state level, it’s easy for an illegal immigrant to access the program benefits.

Jennifer said that when exceptions are sent from states to CMS for approval, “denial is actually super rare. It’s usually always approved.”

She also said it comes as no surprise that many of the states with the highest amount of Medicaid spending are sanctuary states, which tend to have policies and laws that shield illegal immigrants from federal immigration authorities.

Moreover, Jennifer said there are ways for states to get around CMS guidelines. “It’s not easy, but it can and has been done.”

The first generation of illegal immigrants who arrive to the United States tend to be healthy enough to pass any pre-screenings, but Jennifer has observed that the subsequent generations tend to be sicker and require more access to care. If a family is illegally present, they tend to use Emergency Medicaid or nothing at all.

The Epoch Times asked Medicaid Services to provide the most recent data for the total uncompensated care that hospitals have reported. The agency didn’t respond.

Continue reading over at The Epoch Times

Tyler Durden Fri, 03/15/2024 - 09:45

Read More

Continue Reading

International

Fuel poverty in England is probably 2.5 times higher than government statistics show

The top 40% most energy efficient homes aren’t counted as being in fuel poverty, no matter what their bills or income are.

Published

on

By

Julian Hochgesang|Unsplash

The cap set on how much UK energy suppliers can charge for domestic gas and electricity is set to fall by 15% from April 1 2024. Despite this, prices remain shockingly high. The average household energy bill in 2023 was £2,592 a year, dwarfing the pre-pandemic average of £1,308 in 2019.

The term “fuel poverty” refers to a household’s ability to afford the energy required to maintain adequate warmth and the use of other essential appliances. Quite how it is measured varies from country to country. In England, the government uses what is known as the low income low energy efficiency (Lilee) indicator.

Since energy costs started rising sharply in 2021, UK households’ spending powers have plummeted. It would be reasonable to assume that these increasingly hostile economic conditions have caused fuel poverty rates to rise.

However, according to the Lilee fuel poverty metric, in England there have only been modest changes in fuel poverty incidence year on year. In fact, government statistics show a slight decrease in the nationwide rate, from 13.2% in 2020 to 13.0% in 2023.

Our recent study suggests that these figures are incorrect. We estimate the rate of fuel poverty in England to be around 2.5 times higher than what the government’s statistics show, because the criteria underpinning the Lilee estimation process leaves out a large number of financially vulnerable households which, in reality, are unable to afford and maintain adequate warmth.

Blocks of flats in London.
Household fuel poverty in England is calculated on the basis of the energy efficiency of the home. Igor Sporynin|Unsplash

Energy security

In 2022, we undertook an in-depth analysis of Lilee fuel poverty in Greater London. First, we combined fuel poverty, housing and employment data to provide an estimate of vulnerable homes which are omitted from Lilee statistics.

We also surveyed 2,886 residents of Greater London about their experiences of fuel poverty during the winter of 2022. We wanted to gauge energy security, which refers to a type of self-reported fuel poverty. Both parts of the study aimed to demonstrate the potential flaws of the Lilee definition.

Introduced in 2019, the Lilee metric considers a household to be “fuel poor” if it meets two criteria. First, after accounting for energy expenses, its income must fall below the poverty line (which is 60% of median income).

Second, the property must have an energy performance certificate (EPC) rating of D–G (the lowest four ratings). The government’s apparent logic for the Lilee metric is to quicken the net-zero transition of the housing sector.

In Sustainable Warmth, the policy paper that defined the Lilee approach, the government says that EPC A–C-rated homes “will not significantly benefit from energy-efficiency measures”. Hence, the focus on fuel poverty in D–G-rated properties.

Generally speaking, EPC A–C-rated homes (those with the highest three ratings) are considered energy efficient, while D–G-rated homes are deemed inefficient. The problem with how Lilee fuel poverty is measured is that the process assumes that EPC A–C-rated homes are too “energy efficient” to be considered fuel poor: the main focus of the fuel poverty assessment is a characteristic of the property, not the occupant’s financial situation.

In other words, by this metric, anyone living in an energy-efficient home cannot be considered to be in fuel poverty, no matter their financial situation. There is an obvious flaw here.

Around 40% of homes in England have an EPC rating of A–C. According to the Lilee definition, none of these homes can or ever will be classed as fuel poor. Even though energy prices are going through the roof, a single-parent household with dependent children whose only income is universal credit (or some other form of benefits) will still not be considered to be living in fuel poverty if their home is rated A-C.

The lack of protection afforded to these households against an extremely volatile energy market is highly concerning.

In our study, we estimate that 4.4% of London’s homes are rated A-C and also financially vulnerable. That is around 171,091 households, which are currently omitted by the Lilee metric but remain highly likely to be unable to afford adequate energy.

In most other European nations, what is known as the 10% indicator is used to gauge fuel poverty. This metric, which was also used in England from the 1990s until the mid 2010s, considers a home to be fuel poor if more than 10% of income is spent on energy. Here, the main focus of the fuel poverty assessment is the occupant’s financial situation, not the property.

Were such alternative fuel poverty metrics to be employed, a significant portion of those 171,091 households in London would almost certainly qualify as fuel poor.

This is confirmed by the findings of our survey. Our data shows that 28.2% of the 2,886 people who responded were “energy insecure”. This includes being unable to afford energy, making involuntary spending trade-offs between food and energy, and falling behind on energy payments.

Worryingly, we found that the rate of energy insecurity in the survey sample is around 2.5 times higher than the official rate of fuel poverty in London (11.5%), as assessed according to the Lilee metric.

It is likely that this figure can be extrapolated for the rest of England. If anything, energy insecurity may be even higher in other regions, given that Londoners tend to have higher-than-average household income.

The UK government is wrongly omitting hundreds of thousands of English households from fuel poverty statistics. Without a more accurate measure, vulnerable households will continue to be overlooked and not get the assistance they desperately need to stay warm.

Torran Semple receives funding from Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) grant EP/S023305/1.

John Harvey does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

Looking Back At COVID’s Authoritarian Regimes

After having moved from Canada to the United States, partly to be wealthier and partly to be freer (those two are connected, by the way), I was shocked,…

Published

on

After having moved from Canada to the United States, partly to be wealthier and partly to be freer (those two are connected, by the way), I was shocked, in March 2020, when President Trump and most US governors imposed heavy restrictions on people’s freedom. The purpose, said Trump and his COVID-19 advisers, was to “flatten the curve”: shut down people’s mobility for two weeks so that hospitals could catch up with the expected demand from COVID patients. In her book Silent Invasion, Dr. Deborah Birx, the coordinator of the White House Coronavirus Task Force, admitted that she was scrambling during those two weeks to come up with a reason to extend the lockdowns for much longer. As she put it, “I didn’t have the numbers in front of me yet to make the case for extending it longer, but I had two weeks to get them.” In short, she chose the goal and then tried to find the data to justify the goal. This, by the way, was from someone who, along with her task force colleague Dr. Anthony Fauci, kept talking about the importance of the scientific method. By the end of April 2020, the term “flatten the curve” had all but disappeared from public discussion.

Now that we are four years past that awful time, it makes sense to look back and see whether those heavy restrictions on the lives of people of all ages made sense. I’ll save you the suspense. They didn’t. The damage to the economy was huge. Remember that “the economy” is not a term used to describe a big machine; it’s a shorthand for the trillions of interactions among hundreds of millions of people. The lockdowns and the subsequent federal spending ballooned the budget deficit and consequent federal debt. The effect on children’s learning, not just in school but outside of school, was huge. These effects will be with us for a long time. It’s not as if there wasn’t another way to go. The people who came up with the idea of lockdowns did so on the basis of abstract models that had not been tested. They ignored a model of human behavior, which I’ll call Hayekian, that is tested every day.

These are the opening two paragraphs of my latest Defining Ideas article, “Looking Back at COVID’s Authoritarian Regimes,” Defining Ideas, March 14, 2024.

Another excerpt:

That wasn’t the only uncertainty. My daughter Karen lived in San Francisco and made her living teaching Pilates. San Francisco mayor London Breed shut down all the gyms, and so there went my daughter’s business. (The good news was that she quickly got online and shifted many of her clients to virtual Pilates. But that’s another story.) We tried to see her every six weeks or so, whether that meant our driving up to San Fran or her driving down to Monterey. But were we allowed to drive to see her? In that first month and a half, we simply didn’t know.

Read the whole thing, which is longer than usual.

(0 COMMENTS)

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending