Connect with us

Hazelton Capital Partners 1Q20 Commentary: Long Renewable Energy Group

Hazelton Capital Partners 1Q20 Commentary: Long Renewable Energy Group

Published

on

renewable energy group Your Energy Bills energy-related stocks

Hazelton Capital Partners commentary for the first quarter ended April 30, 2020, discussing their current portfolio holdings Renewable Energy Group, Apple and Berkshire Hathaway.

Q1 2020 hedge fund letters, conferences and more

Dear Partner,

Hazelton Capital Partners, LLC (the “Fund”) returned -23.8% from January 1, 2020 through March 31, 2020. By comparison, the S&P 500 returned -19.4% during the same quarter.

Before reviewing the 1st quarter of 2020 and Hazelton Capital Partners’ portfolio, my sincere hope is that everyone, their family, friends, and communities are healthy – that the societal sacrifices made to both shelter and social distance from one another will, in the long-run, bring us closer together as we work to recover and rebuild from the ravages of Covid-19.

The Quarter in Review

Hazelton Capital Partners ended the 1st quarter with a portfolio of 17 equity positions and a cash level equivalent to 12.5% of assets under management. The top five portfolio holdings, which are equal to roughly 50% of the Fund’s net assets, are: Micron Technology (MU), Renewable Energy Group (REGI), Apple Inc (AAPL), Mylan N.V. (MYL) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B).

“Toto, I have a Feeling We’re Not in Kansas Anymore.”

It is incredibly difficult to encapsulate the disruption, destruction, and despair that Covid-19 created during the 1st quarter of 2020, but if I were to try and distill it down into one word it would be unprecedented. Unprecedented, the speed at which the Coronavirus spread throughout the world. Unprecedented, the number of people impacted. Unprecedented, the shutdown of the global economy. Unprecedented, the vast number of people immediately unemployed. Unprecedented, the speed of the market sell-off and the amount of money spent by the Federal Reserve and the US Government to prevent an economic depression. Because the global economy has been put into an economic coma with only segments recently restarting, the full impact of Covid-19’s aftermath has yet to be fully experienced. Shutting down the US economy is not like pausing a movie, you cannot just press the play button and pick up where you left off. It is estimated that it will take over 6 months for the global logistics and supply chains to return to their “new normal” operations. It is important to keep in mind that the “new normal” will mostly depend on future demand and that remains uncertain at best. With small businesses making up most of US businesses and over half the nation’s workforce, it is truly unknown how many small businesses will survive, be able to reopen and remain open over the next couple of weeks and months.

In the past, investors looked to the equity markets as a forward-looking, discount pricing machine – distilling future economic expectations into current prices. At present, there appears to be a meaningful disconnect between the growing number of unemployed Americans still waiting for the economy to reopen and the upswing in the stock market indices at the end of March. For many, the market reversal is a sanguine forecast of a quick recovery and return to corporate growth. Unfortunately, I do not share that narrative or optimism. The stock market reversal on March 23rd was not an anticipation of a swift economic recovery, but instead, a direct correlation to the announcement that the Federal Reserve would begin purchasing corporate bonds (newly issued and outstanding) and exchange-traded funds, in addition to the $4 trillion of liquidity already committed. By acting as the lender of last resort not only to the financial system but to corporate America as well, the fed has all but guaranteed a sizeable portion of the $10 trillion corporate bond market, at least in the short-run. This has allowed corporations like Boeing, the airlines, and the cruise ship operators to tap the debt market to raise capital. Before the Fed’s announcement, the market was fearful that the debt market would “freeze up,” and businesses would be unable to fund their day-to-day needs. For now, the Federal Reserve has backstopped the US corporate bond market, which, in turn, has provided an overflow of liquidity into the equity market. With companies pulling their earnings guidance for the remainder of 2020, the Federal Reserve’s liquidity is the only catalyst at work and can, in the short to immediate run, lift the stock market much faster and more significantly than the promise of improved corporate earnings.

Throughout the 1st quarter sell-off, Hazelton Capital Partners’ portfolio, on aggregate, performed better than the overall market. However, in late March, when the indices rebounded off their quarterly lows, the Fund’s portfolio failed to keep pace with the rapid upswing. The market began to coalesce around specific companies and investing themes that are expected to be less impacted by the economic shutdown in the short run. Most of these companies were deemed either essential businesses or benefitted from their digital footprint. The rest of the stocks were tossed to the side, some, like the airlines, rightfully so. For the patient, long-term investor in search of a business with a strong balance sheet, generating healthy cash flows, and a management team skilled at allocating that cash flow, then the recent turmoil has created a fertile hunting ground, and an opportunity for the partners of Hazelton Capital Partners to add to their capital accounts.

In all the years that Hazelton Capital Partners has operated, the Fund has never recommended or suggested to its partners to add more cash to their account. I want to be clear: I am not suggesting that the market has bottomed or that it will be smooth sailing from this point forward. Throughout April, the Fund has been increasing its cash position by scaling down some of its holdings. For those partners who have the cash to invest (not needed to meet yearly expenses) and a long-term investing horizon, then the current, ongoing market disruption provides a distinctive investing opportunity. You can be assured that Hazelton Capital Partners will not deploy any of its cash until a strong compelling investment presents itself. Covid-19 has laid ruin to the global economy, shutting down nearly 2/3rds of businesses worldwide. There will be numerous companies, ranging from small enterprises to large corporations, that will not survive and still others that will remain weak, unable to stand without government support.

Then there are those companies that will emerge from this tragedy in a much stronger condition: leaner, focused, and more profitable. They will have adapted to embrace the changes in their workplace, their supply chains, and the future needs of their customers and how they transact business. Covid-19 has forever changed the way businesses operate, but some of those changes will create opportunities.

Alaska Airlines (ALK) – Closed Position – 26.8% Loss

Hazelton Capital Partners exited its position in Alaska Airlines in late February and March of 2020. The Fund originally established its position in the summer and fall of 2018. At the time,

Alaska Airlines had completed its $4.0 billion merger with Virgin America, creating the 5th largest domestic airline with a 6% market share and room to grow. Even though on paper Alaska and Virgin were officially one airline as of January 2018, they continue to operate as two distinct entities. It takes over 18 months for an airline to fully integrate the front-end and back- end systems, retrain ground crew, flight staff, and pilots. All that work translates into upfront short-term costs and expenses. Over time, as Alaska Airlines migrated to a single reservations, maintenance, and scheduling system, not only would the airline be able to reduce the short-term expenses but save what was estimated to be around $300 million per year. Additionally, the company was expecting to be able to leverage Virgin America’s gates, routes, and customers to both expand their footprint and loyalty program.

When Hazelton Capital Partners last reviewed our Alaska Airlines investment in mid Q4 of 2019, the company and its management were executing in line with our expectations with a tailwind from a robust economy. By February, concerns over international flying started to weigh on the larger domestic carriers and by mid-March, with states shutting down to protect against Covid-19, the entire industry had been forever changed. Selling out of Alaska Airlines was not an exceedingly difficult or emotional decision to make. The Fund’s original investment thesis and vision of how the industry would operate in the future was no longer valid. Even today, it is not at all clear what air travel is going to look like when passengers begin to fly again. What is certain is that not only will it take years for the airline industry to recover and learn to be profitable, but the US Government just cut in front of the shareholders in the lunch line as they will need to be repaid before shareholders benefit from the company’s earnings. Where Hazelton Capital Partners made a mistake was not recognizing how quickly the airline industry and its stocks were deteriorating in relation to the rest of the market and not being aggressive enough to exit the position quickly instead of over a few days.

Renewable Energy Group (REGI) – Current Holding

Renewable Energy Group remains Hazelton Capital Partners 2nd largest holding. In late December 2019, the US Congress, after a 2-year delay, retroactively passed the BTC (Biodiesel Tax Credit) for 2018 and 2019. In addition, they extended the $1/gallon tax credit through 2022 removing the opaque operating environment that REGI, its feedstock providers, and biodiesel blenders had been operating in for the past two years. After the reinstatement of the BTC, Renewable Energy Group announced that it would be receiving approximately $500 million from the BTC for fiscal 2018 & 2019. At the time of the announcement, REGI’s market capitalization was $660 million with $170 million of net debt (the net of cash and total debt including capital leases). As of December 31, 2019, REGI’s market capitalization improved to $1.05 billion with $330 million of net cash on the balance sheet (adjusting for the $500 million cash infusion from the BTC). By late February, Renewable Energy Group was hitting all-time highs as the company’s robust balance sheet provided the financial stability to expand its renewable diesel operations at its Geismar refinery and explore future opportunities.

I have often referred to REGI as a soap opera stock, as the company always seems to be caught up in a melodramatic headwind hiding its true earnings power. Over the past couple of years, those dramas have stemmed from the lack of clarity surrounding the BTC, and whether the EPA would actively support its mandate to protect the environment instead of being influenced by big oil and its lobbyists. Just as both headwinds were subsiding, the Coronavirus hit, shutting down the global economy. At the same time this was happening, Russia decided to break ranks with OPEC, refusing to limit production, adding to an already oversupplied oil environment.

With the Coronavirus shutting down 2/3 of the US economy, the long-haul segment of the trucking industry has been playing a pivotal role in getting critical goods & essentials, including food, consumer products, and medical supplies across the country and to their destinations.

The surge in long-haul freight demand is being driven by e-commerce, grocery stores, and retailers like Walmart, Target, Home Depot, and Costco, all trying to keep their shelves stocked. But this does not tell the entire story. Local trucking/distribution servicing businesses impacted by the stay-at-home restrictions have seen their business decline and, in some cases, come to a complete halt. Up until the beginning of April, diesel fuel had seen only a slight decline in demand on a year-over-year and month-to-month comparison. Gasoline, whose supply is 2.25x greater than diesel, has already felt the demand destruction as daily drivers sheltered in place, and limited automobile travel reduces demand by up to 50%. In the short run, global demand for oil is expected to decline by 30%.

Despite Renewable Energy Group never having seen this type of demand destruction for oil and diesel, they are in a strong position both operationally (experience with managing feedstocks and output during disruptive cycles) and financially (robust balance sheet with a net cash position) to weather the storm. Even though bio and renewable diesel sales are correlated to petroleum diesel sales, the slowing demand for diesel has not had a demonstrative impact on REGI’s sales. As the US economy reopens and begins to recover, expectations are that diesel demand will have a steady recovery. During the first quarter sell-off, Hazelton Capital Partners repurchased shares of REGI that were sold earlier in Q1 when the company was hitting new highs.  The price of the repurchase shares reflected a company with nearly 45% of its market capitalization in cash.

Apple Inc. (AAPL) – Current Holding

Being a global tech company with a supply chain and manufacturing footprint in China and retail stores throughout the world, Apple was able to see firsthand not only the impact of the Coronavirus in China but how quickly it was spreading globally. On March 13th, Apple took decisive action and closed all its global retail stores that were still open, while continuing to sell its products online.  Selling products via its website is nothing new for the iPhone maker as many customers are now accustomed to buying their Apple products online and either picking them up at the store or getting them delivered. What was a surprise was the number of products that Apple either refreshed, introduced, updated, or launched, over the past two months. Since March, Apple has refreshed its iPad Pro line with a new 11” and 12.9” tablet, introduced the “Magic Keyboard” for each tablet size, updated the MacBook Air and Mac Mini, and launched the new iPhone SE 2020.  The only thing that was different from past launches was the theatrical pageantry of Tim Cook and his team presenting each new product to unabashed adulation from the Apple faithful.

Of the products that were released, the iPhone SE 2020 gained the most attention. With a starting price of $400, the SE was specifically designed to be a “budget” smartphone to compete with a similar sub $400 Android phones from Motorola, Nokia, Google, and Samsung.  The new iPhone has many of the key components (latest iOS features, storage, memory, and processing power) of the iPhone 11 without its high-end upgrades. There is no night mode, no ultra-wide camera, and no face ID to unlock your phone or to use with password-protected apps. Since the SE is housed in an iPhone 8’s chassis, it has a smaller form factor, a smaller screen with margins, and has the “old-fashioned” home button with a fingerprint scanner for unlocking the phone and password verification. Even Apple, with its Nostradamus-like insight into the consumer market could not have foreseen the Covid-19 pandemic, but its release of the SE could hot have arrived at a better time given the recent state of the global economy.

Smartphone growth is slowing. A mixture of higher priced phones, less meaningful innovative change between models, and a movement toward phone financing in lieu of carrier contracts has led to a longer life cycle for smartphones. When combined with market saturation, Apples once powerful growth engine has matured and is slowing and giving way to its Services and Wearables segment.  Over the past 5 years, the combination of Services and Wearables has grown over 30% annualized vs. iPhone’s 7% annualized growth. In addition to having significant annual growth, both the Services and Wearables possess very healthy margins which are recurring for the Services segment.

Apple’s goal in launching the $400 SE was to convert the value-conscious, non-iPhone user while encouraging its own user base, who are currently using legacy models, to upgrade and not abandon the Apple Family. It is estimated that over 30% of iPhone users still use an iPhone 8 or older. Even though these tech “laggards” are happy with their current phones, Apple knows that their phone’s battery is decaying, causing the phone to slow down, “freeze,” and not able to hold its charge for the entire day. Without the iPhone SE 2020 and its $400 price tag, there is a good chance that Apple would lose some of its users to a competing “budget” Android device. By luring new smartphone users to the iPhone platform and keeping the legacy users in the family gives Apple ample opportunity to continue to cross-sell its services, wearables, and even its computers and tablets.

The next big anticipated launch from Apple is expected to be the iPhone 12 which will be released in different sizes and price points, some of which will likely support the budding 5G network. Historically, Apple unveils its new iPhone models in mid-September with sales starting by the end of September/early October in order to gain momentum heading into the holiday season. Apple has already announced that it is delaying the launch of its new iPhone by at least one month. In the past, the market was extremely focused on iPhone sales because that accounted for a disproportionate percentage of the revenue, profits, and long-term growth of the company. As discussed above, with the saturation of smartphone sales, the services and wearables segments are beginning to close the gap, becoming the company’s future lifeblood.

Apple’s sell-off in Q1 provided an opportunity for Hazelton Capital Partners to repurchase some of the share that were sold in Q4-’19 and Q1-’20. The Fund’s strategy has never been to focus on short-term trading, but rather to take advantage of long-term investing opportunities.

Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) – Current Holding

Berkshire Hathaway was added to the portfolio and our top five holdings in Q1 of 2020. Market disruption and uncertainty creates an opportunity for companies and investors that have insight, patience, and cash. Berkshire Hathaway is one of those companies and Warren Buffett is one of those investors. Unlike the 2008/2009 financial crisis, Berkshire Hathaway is not actively deploying its $125 billion cash reserve. In the past, Warren Buffett has provided both guidance and has led by example when he put Berkshire Hathaway’s money to work during market disruptions. This time appears different. Over the past two months, the company and its CEO has been uncharacteristically quiet during the recent turmoil. Which begs the question: Why?

Berkshire Hathaway is a $500 billion holding company whose subsidiaries operate in a wide range of industries including: Insurance, Utilities, Energy, Manufacturing, Transportation, Real Estate, Retail, and Finance, giving Buffett a front-row seat to the impact the Coronavirus and the subsequent economic shut-down is having on the US economy. Warren Buffett’s lack of investments, even with the impressive sell-off over the past two months, is a clear indication to many that the “Oracle of Omaha” still believes there is more pain to be felt in the near term. At the very least, given the amount of insight that Buffett has from his operating subsidiaries, he is unwilling to speculate as to when the US economy will recover.

A key difference between the 2008/2009 financial crisis and today’s Covid-19 pandemic is the Federal Reserve unprecedented actions to keep the debt markets liquid and open for business. On March 23, the Federal Reserve announced it would be using its balance sheet to broaden its bond purchases to include investment grade corporate bonds (BBB rating or better). By April 9th, the Fed went all-in on its “whatever-it-takes” commitment by expanding its corporate purchases to include “Junk” bonds – those bonds rated below BBB (Caveat: The Fed is only buying “Junk” bonds that were rated BBB or better as of March 22 and has received a downgrade since that time). The goal of the Federal Reserve it to keep the US from falling into another Great Depression by keeping its financial markets functioning as the nation waits for the “all clear” sign to return to work. The Federal Reserve’s actions have removed the need for companies to come to Berkshire Hathaway with their hat in hand and the reason why Charlie Munger, Vice-Chairman of Berkshire Hathaway reportedly said in mid-April, “The phone is not ringing off the hook” in contrast to how busy Buffett was during the previous financial crisis.

With its strong balance sheet, large cash position, and Buffett’s ability to quickly deploy capital when a favorable deal presents itself, Berkshire Hathaway represents both a conservative holding during the ongoing economic turmoil, as well as an investment in the eventual US economic recovery. With $125 billion of cash on hand, Buffett could easily spend $50-$60 billion on a single deal. In addition, Berkshire’s subsidiaries will also be looking for long-term opportunistic acquisitions to expand their foothold in their respective industries. These purchases will be much smaller in scope but will help to reinforce Berkshire Hathaway’s long- term competitive edge. Of course, at the moment, it is about being patient and waiting for the opportunities to present themselves.

Administrative

Investing in Hazelton Capital Partners

Hazelton Capital Partners was created as an investment vehicle, allowing those interested in long-term exposure to the equity market to invest along-side me. With a substantial portion of my own capital in the fund, I manage Hazelton Capital Partners assets in the same manner in which I manage my own capital. The best source of introduction to potential investors has come from those that have invested or followed Hazelton Capital Partners progress over the years. Introductions are both welcome and appreciated.

If you are interested in making or increasing your contribution to Hazelton Capital Partners or just learning more about The Fund, please feel free to contact me at (312) 970-9202 or email me bpasikov@hazeltoncapital.com. Questions, comments and concerns are always welcome.

Warm Regards,

Barry Pasikov

Managing Member

This article first appeared on ValueWalk Premium

The post Hazelton Capital Partners 1Q20 Commentary: Long Renewable Energy Group appeared first on ValueWalk.

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

Buried Project Veritas Recording Shows Top Pfizer Scientists Suppressed Concerns Over COVID-19 Boosters, MRNA Tech

Buried Project Veritas Recording Shows Top Pfizer Scientists Suppressed Concerns Over COVID-19 Boosters, MRNA Tech

Submitted by Liam Cosgrove

Former…

Published

on

Buried Project Veritas Recording Shows Top Pfizer Scientists Suppressed Concerns Over COVID-19 Boosters, MRNA Tech

Submitted by Liam Cosgrove

Former Project Veritas & O’Keefe Media Group operative and Pfizer formulation analyst scientist Justin Leslie revealed previously unpublished recordings showing Pfizer’s top vaccine researchers discussing major concerns surrounding COVID-19 vaccines. Leslie delivered these recordings to Veritas in late 2021, but they were never published:

Featured in Leslie’s footage is Kanwal Gill, a principal scientist at Pfizer. Gill was weary of MRNA technology given its long research history yet lack of approved commercial products. She called the vaccines “sneaky,” suggesting latent side effects could emerge in time.

Gill goes on to illustrate how the vaccine formulation process was dramatically rushed under the FDA’s Emergency Use Authorization and adds that profit incentives likely played a role:

"It’s going to affect my heart, and I’m going to die. And nobody’s talking about that."

Leslie recorded another colleague, Pfizer’s pharmaceutical formulation scientist Ramin Darvari, who raised the since-validated concern that repeat booster intake could damage the cardiovascular system:

None of these claims will be shocking to hear in 2024, but it is telling that high-level Pfizer researchers were discussing these topics in private while the company assured the public of “no serious safety concerns” upon the jab’s release:

Vaccine for Children is a Different Formulation

Leslie sent me a little-known FDA-Pfizer conference — a 7-hour Zoom meeting published in tandem with the approval of the vaccine for 5 – 11 year-olds — during which Pfizer’s vice presidents of vaccine research and development, Nicholas Warne and William Gruber, discussed a last-minute change to the vaccine’s “buffer” — from “PBS” to “Tris” — to improve its shelf life. For about 30 seconds of these 7 hours, Gruber acknowledged that the new formula was NOT the one used in clinical trials (emphasis mine):


“The studies were done using the same volume… but contained the PBS buffer. We obviously had extensive consultations with the FDA and it was determined that the clinical studies were not required because, again, the LNP and the MRNA are the same and the behavior — in terms of reactogenicity and efficacy — are expected to be the same.

According to Leslie, the tweaked “buffer” dramatically changed the temperature needed for storage: “Before they changed this last step of the formulation, the formula was to be kept at -80 degrees Celsius. After they changed the last step, we kept them at 2 to 8 degrees celsius,” Leslie told me.

The claims are backed up in the referenced video presentation:

I’m no vaccinologist but an 80-degree temperature delta — and a 5x shelf-life in a warmer climate — seems like a significant change that might warrant clinical trials before commercial release.

Despite this information technically being public, there has been virtually no media scrutiny or even coverage — and in fact, most were told the vaccine for children was the same formula but just a smaller dose — which is perhaps due to a combination of the information being buried within a 7-hour jargon-filled presentation and our media being totally dysfunctional.

Bohemian Grove?

Leslie’s 2-hour long documentary on his experience at both Pfizer and O’Keefe’s companies concludes on an interesting note: James O’Keefe attended an outing at the Bohemian Grove.

Leslie offers this photo of James’ Bohemian Grove “GATE” slip as evidence, left on his work desk atop a copy of his book, “American Muckraker”:

My thoughts on the Bohemian Grove: my good friend’s dad was its general manager for several decades. From what I have gathered through that connection, the Bohemian Grove is not some version of the Illuminati, at least not in the institutional sense.

Do powerful elites hangout there? Absolutely. Do they discuss their plans for the world while hanging out there? I’m sure it has happened. Do they have a weird ritual with a giant owl? Yep, Alex Jones showed that to the world.

My perspective is based on conversations with my friend and my belief that his father is not lying to him. I could be wrong and am open to evidence — like if boxer Ryan Garcia decides to produce evidence regarding his rape claims — and I do find it a bit strange the club would invite O’Keefe who is notorious for covertly filming, but Occam’s razor would lead me to believe the club is — as it was under my friend’s dad — run by boomer conservatives the extent of whose politics include disliking wokeness, immigration, and Biden (common subjects of O’Keefe’s work).

Therefore, I don’t find O’Keefe’s visit to the club indicative that he is some sort of Operation Mockingbird asset as Leslie tries to depict (however Mockingbird is a 100% legitimate conspiracy). I have also met James several times and even came close to joining OMG. While I disagreed with James on the significance of many of his stories — finding some to be overhyped and showy — I never doubted his conviction in them.

As for why Leslie’s story was squashed… all my sources told me it was to avoid jail time for Veritas executives.

Feel free to watch Leslie’s full documentary here and decide for yourself.

Fun fact — Justin Leslie was also the operative behind this mega-viral Project Veritas story where Pfizer’s director of R&D claimed the company was privately mutating COVID-19 behind closed doors:

Tyler Durden Tue, 03/12/2024 - 13:40

Read More

Continue Reading

International

Association of prenatal vitamins and metals with epigenetic aging at birth and in childhood

“[…] our findings support the hypothesis that the intrauterine environment, particularly essential and non-essential metals, affect epigenetic aging…

Published

on

“[…] our findings support the hypothesis that the intrauterine environment, particularly essential and non-essential metals, affect epigenetic aging biomarkers across the life course.”

Credit: 2024 Bozack et al.

“[…] our findings support the hypothesis that the intrauterine environment, particularly essential and non-essential metals, affect epigenetic aging biomarkers across the life course.”

BUFFALO, NY- March 12, 2024 – A new research paper was published in Aging (listed by MEDLINE/PubMed as “Aging (Albany NY)” and “Aging-US” by Web of Science) Volume 16, Issue 4, entitled, “Associations of prenatal one-carbon metabolism nutrients and metals with epigenetic aging biomarkers at birth and in childhood in a US cohort.”

Epigenetic gestational age acceleration (EGAA) at birth and epigenetic age acceleration (EAA) in childhood may be biomarkers of the intrauterine environment. In this new study, researchers Anne K. Bozack, Sheryl L. Rifas-Shiman, Andrea A. Baccarelli, Robert O. Wright, Diane R. Gold, Emily Oken, Marie-France Hivert, and Andres Cardenas from Stanford University School of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Columbia University, and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai investigated the extent to which first-trimester folate, B12, 5 essential and 7 non-essential metals in maternal circulation are associated with EGAA and EAA in early life. 

“[…] we hypothesized that OCM [one-carbon metabolism] nutrients and essential metals would be positively associated with EGAA and non-essential metals would be negatively associated with EGAA. We also investigated nonlinear associations and associations with mixtures of micronutrients and metals.”

Bohlin EGAA and Horvath pan-tissue and skin and blood EAA were calculated using DNA methylation measured in cord blood (N=351) and mid-childhood blood (N=326; median age = 7.7 years) in the Project Viva pre-birth cohort. A one standard deviation increase in individual essential metals (copper, manganese, and zinc) was associated with 0.94-1.2 weeks lower Horvath EAA at birth, and patterns of exposures identified by exploratory factor analysis suggested that a common source of essential metals was associated with Horvath EAA. The researchers also observed evidence of nonlinear associations of zinc with Bohlin EGAA, magnesium and lead with Horvath EAA, and cesium with skin and blood EAA at birth. Overall, associations at birth did not persist in mid-childhood; however, arsenic was associated with greater EAA at birth and in childhood. 

“Prenatal metals, including essential metals and arsenic, are associated with epigenetic aging in early life, which might be associated with future health.”

 

Read the full paper: DOI: https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.205602 

Corresponding Author: Andres Cardenas

Corresponding Email: andres.cardenas@stanford.edu 

Keywords: epigenetic age acceleration, metals, folate, B12, prenatal exposures

Click here to sign up for free Altmetric alerts about this article.

 

About Aging:

Launched in 2009, Aging publishes papers of general interest and biological significance in all fields of aging research and age-related diseases, including cancer—and now, with a special focus on COVID-19 vulnerability as an age-dependent syndrome. Topics in Aging go beyond traditional gerontology, including, but not limited to, cellular and molecular biology, human age-related diseases, pathology in model organisms, signal transduction pathways (e.g., p53, sirtuins, and PI-3K/AKT/mTOR, among others), and approaches to modulating these signaling pathways.

Please visit our website at www.Aging-US.com​​ and connect with us:

  • Facebook
  • X, formerly Twitter
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Pinterest
  • Spotify, and available wherever you listen to podcasts

 

Click here to subscribe to Aging publication updates.

For media inquiries, please contact media@impactjournals.com.

 

Aging (Aging-US) Journal Office

6666 E. Quaker Str., Suite 1B

Orchard Park, NY 14127

Phone: 1-800-922-0957, option 1

###


Read More

Continue Reading

International

A beginner’s guide to the taxes you’ll hear about this election season

Everything you need to know about income tax, national insurance and more.

Cast Of Thousands/Shutterstock

National insurance, income tax, VAT, capital gains tax, inheritance tax… it’s easy to get confused about the many different ways we contribute to the cost of running the country. The budget announcement is the key time each year when the government shares its financial plans with us all, and announces changes that may make a tangible difference to what you pay.

But you’ll likely be hearing a lot more about taxes in the coming months – promises to cut or raise them are an easy win (or lose) for politicians in an election year. We may even get at least one “mini-budget”.

If you’ve recently entered the workforce or the housing market, you may still be wrapping your mind around all of these terms. Here is what you need to know about the different types of taxes and how they affect you.

The UK broadly uses three ways to collect tax:

1. When you earn money

If you are an employee or own a business, taxes are deducted from your salary or profits you make. For most people, this happens in two ways: income tax, and national insurance contributions (or NICs).

If you are self-employed, you will have to pay your taxes via an annual tax return assessment. You might also have to pay taxes this way for interest you earn on savings, dividends (distribution of profits from a company or shares you own) received and most other forms of income not taxed before you get it.

Around two-thirds of taxes collected come from people’s or business’ incomes in the UK.

2. When you spend money

VAT and excise duties are taxes on most goods and services you buy, with some exceptions like books and children’s clothing. About 20% of the total tax collected is VAT.

3. Taxes on wealth and assets

These are mainly taxes on the money you earn if you sell assets (like property or stocks) for more than you bought them for, or when you pass on assets in an inheritance. In the latter case in the UK, the recipient doesn’t pay this, it is the estate paying it out that must cover this if due. These taxes contribute only about 3% to the total tax collected.

You also likely have to pay council tax, which is set by the council you live in based on the value of your house or flat. It is paid by the user of the property, no matter if you own or rent. If you are a full-time student or on some apprenticeship schemes, you may get a deduction or not have to pay council tax at all.


Quarter life, a series by The Conversation

This article is part of Quarter Life, a series about issues affecting those of us in our 20s and 30s. From the challenges of beginning a career and taking care of our mental health, to the excitement of starting a family, adopting a pet or just making friends as an adult. The articles in this series explore the questions and bring answers as we navigate this turbulent period of life.

You may be interested in:

If you get your financial advice on social media, watch out for misinformation

Future graduates will pay more in student loan repayments – and the poorest will be worst affected

Selling on Vinted, Etsy or eBay? Here’s what you need to know about paying tax


Put together, these totalled almost £790 billion in 2022-23, which the government spends on public services such as the NHS, schools and social care. The government collects taxes from all sources and sets its spending plans accordingly, borrowing to make up any difference between the two.

Income tax

The amount of income tax you pay is determined by where your income sits in a series of “bands” set by the government. Almost everyone is entitled to a “personal allowance”, currently £12,570, which you can earn without needing to pay any income tax.

You then pay 20% in tax on each pound of income you earn (across all sources) from £12,570-£50,270. You pay 40% on each extra pound up to £125,140 and 45% over this. If you earn more than £100,000, the personal allowance (amount of untaxed income) starts to decrease.

If you are self-employed, the same rates apply to you. You just don’t have an employer to take this off your salary each month. Instead, you have to make sure you have enough money at the end of the year to pay this directly to the government.


Read more: Taxes aren't just about money – they shape how we think about each other


The government can increase the threshold limits to adjust for inflation. This tries to ensure any wage rise you get in response to higher prices doesn’t lead to you having to pay a higher tax rate. However, the government announced in 2021 that they would freeze these thresholds until 2026 (extended now to 2028), arguing that it would help repay the costs of the pandemic.

Given wages are now rising for many to help with the cost of living crisis, this means many people will pay more income tax this coming year than they did before. This is sometimes referred to as “fiscal drag” – where lower earners are “dragged” into paying higher tax rates, or being taxed on more of their income.

National insurance

National insurance contributions (NICs) are a second “tax” you pay on your income – or to be precise, on your earned income (your salary). You don’t pay this on some forms of income, including savings or dividends, and you also don’t pay it once you reach state retirement age (currently 66).

While Jeremy Hunt, the current chancellor of the exchequer, didn’t adjust income tax meaningfully in this year’s budget, he did announce a cut to NICs. This was a surprise to many, as we had already seen rates fall from 12% to 10% on incomes higher than £242/week in January. It will now fall again to 8% from April.


Read more: Budget 2024: experts explain what it means for taxpayers, businesses, borrowers and the NHS


While this is charged separately to income tax, in reality it all just goes into one pot with other taxes. Some, including the chancellor, say it is time to merge these two deductions and make this simpler for everyone. In his budget speech this year, Hunt said he’d like to see this tax go entirely. He thinks this isn’t fair on those who have to pay it, as it is only charged on some forms of income and on some workers.

I wouldn’t hold my breath for this to happen however, and even if it did, there are huge sums linked to NICs (nearly £180bn last year) so it would almost certainly have to be collected from elsewhere (such as via an increase in income taxes, or a lot more borrowing) to make sure the government could still balance its books.

A young black man sits at a home office desk with his feet up, looking at a mobile phone
Do you know how much tax you pay? Alex from the Rock/Shutterstock

Other taxes

There are likely to be further tweaks to the UK’s tax system soon, perhaps by the current government before the election – and almost certainly if there is a change of government.

Wealth taxes may be in line for a change. In the budget, the chancellor reduced capital gains taxes on sales of assets such as second properties (from 28% to 24%). These types of taxes provide only a limited amount of money to the government, as quite high thresholds apply for inheritance tax (up to £1 million if you are passing on a family home).

There are calls from many quarters though to look again at these types of taxes. Wealth inequality (the differences between total wealth held by the richest compared to the poorest) in the UK is very high (much higher than income inequality) and rising.

But how to do this effectively is a matter of much debate. A recent study suggested a one-off tax on total wealth held over a certain threshold might work. But wealth taxes are challenging to make work in practice, and both main political parties have already said this isn’t an option they are considering currently.

Andy Lymer and his colleagues at the Centre for Personal Financial Wellbeing at Aston University currently or have recently received funding for their research work from a variety of funding bodies including the UK's Money and Pension Service, the Aviva Foundation, Fair4All Finance, NEST Insight, the Gambling Commission, Vivid Housing and the ESRC, amongst others.

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending