Spread & Containment
German Minister Admits Lockdown Will Kill More Than COVID-19 Does
German Minister Admits Lockdown Will Kill More Than COVID-19 Does
Authored by Steve Watson via Summit News,
Germany’s Minister of Economic Cooperation and Development, Gerd Muller, has warned that lockdown measures throughout the globe will end up killing more people than the Coronavirus itself.
In an interview with German newspaper Handelsblatt, Muller warned that the response to the global pandemic has resulted in “one of the biggest” hunger and poverty crises in history.
Muller warned that further damage will be done if draconian measures continue to be enacted by governments.
“We expect an additional 400,000 deaths from malaria and HIV this year on the African continent alone,” Muller emphasised, adding that “half a million more will die from tuberculosis.”
“The supply of food and medication is no longer guaranteed,” Muller continued, adding “Many of the West’s aid programs are not adequately funded,” also noting that while countries focus on battling the virus at home, it is having a massive toll on countries not equipped to combat it without help.
Muller further warned that “humanitarian catastrophes” are “building up right on our doorstep,” while European governments concentrate on lockdowns and restricting the movement of people.
“Europe has decided to support its own economy with programs worth around two trillion euros. No additional support is planned for Africa. That will catch up with us,” Muller urged.
The Minister admitted that a further wave of mass migration in the future could result from such action.
Muller’s comments come five months after a leaked study from inside the German Ministry of the Interior revealed that the impact of the country’s lockdown could end up killing more people than the coronavirus due to victims of other serious illnesses not receiving treatment.
The findings dovetail with other research that has concluded lockdowns will conservatively “destroy at least seven times more years of human life” than they save.
As we have previously highlighted, in the UK there have already been up to 10,000 excess deaths as a result of seriously ill people avoiding hospitals due to COVID-19 or not having their hospital treatments cancelled.
Professor Richard Sullivan also warned that there will be more excess cancer deaths in the UK than total coronavirus deaths due to people’s access to screenings and treatment being restricted as a result of the lockdown.
His comments were echoed by Peter Nilsson, a Swedish professor of internal medicine and epidemiology at Lund University, who said, “It’s so important to understand that the deaths of COVID-19 will be far less than the deaths caused by societal lockdown when the economy is ruined.”
According to Professor Karol Sikora, an NHS consultant oncologist, there could be 50,000 excess deaths from cancer as a result of routine screenings being suspended during the lockdown in the UK.
In addition, a study published in The Lancet that notes “physical distancing, school closures, trade restrictions, and country lockdowns” are worsening global child malnutrition.
Experts have also warned that there will be 1.4 million deaths globally from untreated TB infections due to the lockdown.
As we further previously highlighted, a data analyst consortium in South Africa found that the economic consequences of the country’s lockdown will lead to 29 times more people dying than the coronavirus itself.
Hundreds of doctors are also on record as opposing lockdown measures, warning that they will cause more death than the coronavirus itself.
Despite citizens across the world being told to observe the lockdown to “save lives,” numerous experts who are now warning that the lockdown could end up costing more lives are being ignored or smeared by the media.
Spread & Containment
Henderson and Hooper on Ivermectin
On July 28 (electronic) and July 29 (print edition), the Wall Street Journal published an article by Charley Hooper and me on ivermectin. At our request, the Journal published a correction that we provided on the evening of July 28 and our letter to the..
On July 28 (electronic) and July 29 (print edition), the Wall Street Journal published an article by Charley Hooper and me on ivermectin. At our request, the Journal published a correction that we provided on the evening of July 28 and our letter to the editor. The letter to the editor is appended below.
Because over 30 days have passed, I’m free to upload the whole article.
Here’s the article:
The Food and Drug Administration claims to follow the science. So why is it attacking ivermectin, a medication it certified in 1996?
Earlier this year the agency put out a special warning that “you should not use ivermectin to treat or prevent COVID-19.” The FDA’s statement included words and phrases such as “serious harm,” “hospitalized,” “dangerous,” “very dangerous,” “seizures,” “coma and even death” and “highly toxic.” Any reader would think the FDA was warning against poison pills. In fact, the drug is FDA-approved as a safe and effective antiparasitic.
Ivermectin was developed and marketed by Merck while one of us (Mr. Hooper) worked there years ago. William C. Campbell and Satoshi Omura won the 2015 Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine for discovering and developing avermectin, which Mr. Campbell and associates modified to create ivermectin.
Ivermectin is on the World Health Organization’s List of Essential Medicines. Merck has donated four billion doses to prevent river blindness and other diseases in Africa and other places where parasites are common. A group of 10 doctors who call themselves the Front Line Covid-19 Critical Care Alliance have said ivermectin is “one of the safest, low-cost, and widely available drugs in the history of medicine.”
Ivermectin fights 21 viruses, including SARS-CoV-2, the cause of Covid-19. A single dose reduced the viral load of SARS-CoV-2 in cells by 99.8% in 24 hours and 99.98% in 48 hours, according to a June 2020 study published in the journal Antiviral Research.
Some 70 clinical trials are evaluating the use of ivermectin for treating Covid-19. The statistically significant evidence suggests that it is safe and works for both treating and preventing the disease.
In 115 patients with Covid-19 who received a single dose of ivermectin, none developed pneumonia or cardiovascular complications, while 11.4% of those in the control group did. Fewer ivermectin patients developed respiratory distress (2.6% vs. 15.8%); fewer required oxygen (9.6% vs. 45.9%); fewer required antibiotics (15.7% vs. 60.2%); and fewer entered intensive care (0.1% vs. 8.3%). Ivermectin-treated patients tested negative faster, in four days instead of 15, and stayed in the hospital nine days on average instead of 15. Ivermectin patients experienced 13.3% mortality compared with 24.5% in the control group.
Moreover, the drug can help prevent Covid-19. One 2020 article in Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications looked at what happened after the drug was given to family members of confirmed Covid-19 patients. Less than 8% became infected, versus 58.4% of those untreated.
Despite the FDA’s claims, ivermectin is safe at approved doses. Out of four billion doses administered since 1998, there have been only 28 cases of serious neurological adverse events, according to an article published this year in the American Journal of Therapeutics. The same study found that ivermectin has been used safely in pregnant women, children and infants.
If the FDA were driven by science and evidence, it would give an emergency-use authorization for ivermectin for Covid-19. Instead, the FDA asserts without evidence that ivermectin is dangerous.
At the bottom of the FDA’s warning against ivermectin is this statement: “Meanwhile, effective ways to limit the spread of COVID-19 continue to be to wear your mask, stay at least 6 feet from others who don’t live with you, wash hands frequently, and avoid crowds.” Is this based on the kinds of double-blind studies that the FDA requires for drug approvals? No.
Correction
This article has been edited to remove a reference to a study of 200 healthcare workers by Ahmed Elgazzar of Benha University in Egypt. Messrs. Henderson and Hooper relied on a summary of studiespublished in the American Journal of Therapeutics. They learned after publication that this study has been retracted because of charges of data manipulation.
Our letter to the editor, which ran in the July 29 electronic edition (July 30 print):
We, the authors of “Why Is the FDA Attacking a Safe, Effective Drug?” (op-ed, July 29), have egg on our faces. Relying on a summary of studies published in the American Journal of Therapeutics, we quoted the results from a study of 200 healthcare workers. After our article was published, we learned that this study, by Ahmed Elgazzar of Benha University in Egypt, has recently been retracted due to serious charges of data manipulation.
We retract the part of our article that relied on the data from Dr. Elgazzar’s study. But the broader point stands: There’s strong evidence of ivermectin’s efficacy in treating Covid-19.
David R. Henderson
Charles L. Hooper
Grass Valley, Calif.
(2 COMMENTS) fda clinical trials medication covid-19 mortality spread africa world health organization
Spread & Containment
Discord IPO Could Come in Late 2021: Information for Investors
Investors are eagerly waiting for the anticipated Discord IPO. The company is one of the most anticipated IPOs of 2021. Here’s what we know…
The post Discord IPO Could Come in Late 2021: Information for Investors appeared first on Investment U.
Investors are eagerly waiting for the anticipated Discord IPO. The company is one of the most anticipated IPOs of the year, and it could happen as soon as late 2021.
So, what’s the latest news on the anticipated Discord IPO? Here’s what we know…
Discord IPO: About the Business
Discord is a communication platform that enables chat, audio and video communication, file sharing and other features.
The company was founded in 2015 to solve a big problem: communicating with friends online while playing games. Founders Jason Citron and Stan Vishnevskiy shared a love of video games and the friendships and connections that came from them. But communication tools were slow, unreliable and complex. Surely there could be a more reliable service to help gamers communicate?
Discord has expanded its reach beyond the gaming community since its inception. In 2020, the company reported 70% of its user base used the platform for non-gaming purposes. The platform is used for various activities including virtual classes, groups, clubs and conventions. Today, Discord has an established audience with 150 million monthly active users.
There are several apps that provide similar capabilities, but Discord stands out with a few unique features…
- Users can communicate through private and public groups called servers. There are groups within servers called channels. Most games have their own dedicated servers. And groups can form their own private servers.
- It works on any platform. Windows, iOS, Android, Xbox, Playstation and more are supported.
- The platform is compatible with other apps. Discord can sync to apps like Twitch, Mixer, YouTube, Spotify and other popular applications.
- Users can screen share. The feature allows users to hang out and play games or browse social apps together
Investors and analysts expect Discord to continue to grow its 19 million weekly active servers. In the future, many analysts anticipate that Discord users will create more servers and use the app in new ways. And the last two years have shown that to be true.
Discord Reported Continuous Growth During Pandemic
The pandemic altered many people’s ability to connect with friends and family. Furthermore, stay-at-home mandates restricted what people could do or how they could use their free time.
People turned to new ways of passing the time throughout the pandemic. Many people took up new hobbies, interests and connections during quarantine. For some, it meant an at-home project. Others may have joined a cooking class. And many took up video games to pass time.
Many people were able to find a sense of community using the Discord app and the servers and channels within the platform. On Discord’s business blog, the co-founders wrote…
2020’s been a heavy year for all of us and we’re honored that many of you have turned to Discord to find belonging and comfort during such a challenging time. We’re just glad we’ve been able to be helpful in any way possible…
It’s been inspiring to see all the creative ways you’ve been using Discord to stay close despite spending more time apart. We’ve seen tons of new organizations, events, and groups join Discord to create their own spaces: College students recreating the campus club atmosphere; activists organizing around political and social movements; friends playing Among Us all around the world; and even couples hosting virtual wedding ceremonies.
With the COVID-19 pandemic and the increase in gamers at home, Discord has shown continuous growth in user numbers. Discord is expanding both its gaming and non-gaming markets rapidly. As a result, investors are increasingly looking for ways to invest in the company. Let’s take a look at Discord’s funding and finances…
Discord Turns Down Acquisition Offers in Favor of IPO
A number of venture capital firms have backed Discord. This includes Greylock, IVP, Benchmark, Spark Capital and Greenoaks Capital. The company has gone through several funding rounds and market experts expect Discord to announce a new funding round soon.
In May, Sony announced a $100 million deal to integrate Discord chat with the PlayStation, one the company’s most valuable products. The company was last privately valued at $7 billion, according to TechCrunch.
There have been several attempts to acquire Discord. Earlier this year, Microsoft made the company an offer for $10 billion. Discord turned down Microsoft, according to the Wall Street Journal. Other past acquisition offers included Amazon, Twitter and Epic Games, according to Bloomberg. Instead, a Discord IPO was rumored to be on its way to the market. That means Discord stock could trade on the open market soon.
Despite the fact that the app has denied the merger rumors, an official statement about a Discord IPO has yet to release. But the anticipated funding round could value the company at $15 billion. And funding rumors after turning down acquisition offers have investors on the edge of their seats.
Until Discord goes public, the company is privately held — and so are its finances. The company hasn’t disclosed much information on that end. But we’ll give you the latest updates on the company’s finances when the filing becomes public if you stick around. Let’s take a look at some filing details we do know…
Discord IPO Filing Details
There have been no official announcements for the Discord IPO. The company has yet to file paperwork with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to begin the IPO process. But the company hired its first-ever CFO in March, and it has investors speculating that Discord could make announcements to go public soon.
While there is no official date for the IPO, hints for future plans toward going public should have investors preparing.
From Roblox (NYSE: RBLX) to Zynga (Nasdaq: ZNGA), there are many opportunities to invest in gaming companies that have hit the market. And you could bring in massive gains if you stay ahead of the trends and do your research.
As always, make sure to research before you invest. IPOs can be volatile for the first few months. And share prices can change quickly. But if IPO investing interests you, check out our top recent IPOs and our IPO calendar. We update it daily to give you the latest news on upcoming and filed IPOs.
If you’re looking for the latest investment opportunities, consider signing up for Liberty Through Wealth. This free e-letter is full of market insights from leading experts. You’ll hear directly from bestselling author and investment expert Alexander Green. He’s also worked as an investment advisor, research analyst and portfolio manager on Wall Street for 16 years.
The post Discord IPO Could Come in Late 2021: Information for Investors appeared first on Investment U.
nasdaq pandemic covid-19 quarantineSpread & Containment
Amazon Tells Contractors To Stop Screening For Marijuana As Hiring Binge Begins
Amazon Tells Contractors To Stop Screening For Marijuana As Hiring Binge Begins
Both Amazon and Walmart are about to make massive pushes to add more than 55,000 and 20,000 employees, respectively. Amazon is looking for corporate and technolog
Both Amazon and Walmart are about to make massive pushes to add more than 55,000 and 20,000 employees, respectively. Amazon is looking for corporate and technology employees while Walmart's hiring is focusing on supply chain.
The move for Amazon to hire 55,000 employees is one of new CEO Andy Jassy's first major initiatives since taking over for former CEO Jeff Bezos earlier this year. Positions will include engineering, research science and robotics roles.
The monster hiring spree will see Amazon bring on employees equal to more than 33% of Google's workforce and almost all of Facebook's workforce, according to CNBC. It'll also be a 20% increase to Amazon's current tech and corporate workforce, which currently numbers about 275,000.
But it's not just Amazon's in-house workforce that needs expanding. Bloomberg reported Wednesday that Amazon has found a solution for the contract delivery drivers it uses to deliver packages from its fulfillment centers to customers' doorsteps: Recruit pot smokers.
That's right: despite the fact that driving while high on any substance is illegal, the company is advising its delivery partners to prominently advertise that they don’t screen applicants for marijuana use, according to emails between Amazon and contractors reviewed by Bloomberg.
Doing so can boost the number of job applicants by as much as 400%, Amazon says in one message to its driver-contractors (without explaining where it got the number). Conversely, the company says, screening for marijuana cuts the prospective worker pool by up to 30%. One delivery partner who stopped screening applicants at Amazon’s behest says marijuana was the prevailing reason most people failed drug tests. Now that she’s only testing for drugs like opiates and amphetamines, more drivers pass.
Other delivery companies are continuing to screen applicants, concerned about the insurance and liability implications in the many states where weed use remains illegal. They also worry that ending drug testing might prompt some drivers to toke up before going out on a route.
“If one of my drivers crashes and kills someone and tests positive for marijuana, that’s my problem, not Amazon’s,” said one, who requested anonymity to discuss the issue because Amazon discourages delivery company owners from speaking to the media.
And it doesn't look like Amazon has any plans to drop marijuana screens from its own hiring procedures. CEO Jassey commented publicly that the hiring binge will help Amazon "keep up with demand in retail, the cloud and advertising, among other businesses" like the company's plan to put satellites into orbit for broadband access.
“There are so many jobs during the pandemic that have been displaced or have been altered, and there are so many people who are thinking about different and new jobs,” Jassey commented.
The new CEO continued: “It’s part of what we think makes ‘Career Day’ so timely and so useful.”
Addressing recent concerns about treatment of employees and deflecting pressure to unionize, Jassey continued: “Everybody at the company has the freedom - and really, the expectation - to critically look at how it can be better and then invent ways to make it better.”
Amazon has been “very competitive on the compensation side," Jassey said. “We’ve led the way in the $15 minimum wage,” and for some states on average that “really, the starting salary is $17 an hour.”
Over 40,000 of the new jobs will be in the U.S., while others will be based in India, Germany and Japan.
Separately, Walmart also announced this week it was going on a massive hiring binge, bringing on 20,000 supply chain employees as the big box retailer heads into the holiday season. Jobs will be a "mix of full-time and part-time, but will be permanent positions," according to CNBC.
The company's blog said: "As our business continues evolving to meet the needs of today’s customers, having a robust supply chain is more important than ever. That’s why we’re excited to announce that our team is growing."
It continued: "We know that offering competitive pay is essential in order to build a network for the future. The average wage for supply chain associates is $20.37 per hour. We know that financial stability, health benefits, family support and career development opportunities are all critical factors to weigh when considering a job, and we aim not to just meet but exceed our associates’ expectations on each of these fronts. Every item on our store shelves and in our online inventory is there because of the combined efforts of our associates working in more than 250 supply chain facilities across the country."
-
Spread & Containment23 hours agoCalifornia Nurse Shortage Reaches “Crisis Level” As Vaccine Mandate Wards Off Traveling Nurses
-
Crypto11 hours agoCrypto and blockchain jobs’ share grew 118% in ten months, new data shows
-
Government20 hours agoThe Orwellian Vaccine Passport Agenda Relies On The Lie Of The “Social Contract”
-
Crypto12 hours agoExtra Crunch roundup: cohort analysis, YC Demo Day recaps, building your supply chain
-
Government15 hours agoMuch Ado, but Barring Significant Downside Surprise, August Jobs Report will not Stand in the Way of Fed Tapering
-
Economics17 hours agoFacing Inflation Threat, German Investors Loading Up On Gold
-
Spread & Containment3 hours agoHenderson and Hooper on Ivermectin
-
Economics19 hours agoAn Overview of Gold Investing and Prices



