Connect with us

Filling Equipment Market Size to Grow by USD 2.17 billion with 44% of the contribution from APAC – Technavio

Filling Equipment Market Size to Grow by USD 2.17 billion with 44% of the contribution from APAC – Technavio
PR Newswire
NEW YORK, Aug. 22, 2022

NEW YORK, Aug. 22, 2022 /PRNewswire/ — The latest market analysis report titled Filling Equipment Mark…

Published

on

Filling Equipment Market Size to Grow by USD 2.17 billion with 44% of the contribution from APAC - Technavio

PR Newswire

NEW YORK, Aug. 22, 2022 /PRNewswire/ -- The latest market analysis report titled Filling Equipment Market by End-user and Geography - Forecast and Analysis 2022-2026 has been added to Technavio's catalog. The analysts have predicted the market to garner an accelerating growth momentum at a CAGR of 4.94%. The analysts have categorized the global filling equipment market as a part of the global industrial machinery market. Our report provides extensive information on the value chain analysis for the filling equipment market, which vendors can leverage to gain a competitive advantage during the forecast period. The data available in our value chain analysis segment can help vendors drive costs and enhance customer services during the forecast period.

For more insights on the scope and value chain analysis, Read a FREE Sample Report

Filling Equipment Market Segmentation Insights

  • End-user
    • Food And Beverage: The filling equipment market share growth in the food and beverages segment will be significant during the forecast period. The growing urbanization and health consciousness among individuals and rising disposable incomes of consumers have cumulatively contributed to an increase in the consumption of healthy and ready-to-eat food. These factors are anticipated to contribute to the rise in the sales of equipment such as filling equipment used in the food and beverage industry.
    • Pharmaceutical
    • Chemicals And Petrochemicals
    • Others
  • Geography
    • APAC: 44% of the market's growth will originate from APAC during the forecast period. China and Japan are the key markets for filling equipment in APAC. Market growth in this region will be faster than the growth of the market in other regions. The increase in consumption in the beverage sector will facilitate the filling equipment market growth in APAC over the forecast period.
    • Europe
    • North America
    • South America
    • Middle East And Africa

Request for Sample Report for Segment-based Contribution and Regional Opportunities

Filling Equipment Market Vendor Landscape

  • The market is fragmented, and the degree of fragmentation will accelerate during the forecast period. To make the most of the opportunities, market vendors should focus more on the growth prospects in the fast-growing segments, while maintaining their positions in the slow-growing segments. 
  • To make the most of the opportunities and recover from post COVID-19 impact, market vendors should focus more on the growth prospects in the fast-growing segments, while maintaining their positions in the slow-growing segments.
  • The filling equipment market forecast report offers in-depth insights into key vendor profiles. The profiles include information on the production, sustainability, and prospects of the leading companies.
  • Backed with competitive intelligence and benchmarking, our research reports on the Filling Equipment Market are designed to provide entry support, customer profile, and M&As as well as go-to-market strategy support.

Top Key Players In the Market are: 

  • ACASI Machinery Inc.
  • Aetnagroup S.p.A.
  • Barry-Wehmiller Group Inc.
  • Coesia SpA
  • E PAK Machinery Inc.
  • Feige FILLING GmbH
  • Filamatic
  • FILLING EQUIPMENT Co. Inc.
  • GEA Group Aktiengesellschaft
  • John Bean Technologies Corp.
  • KRONES AG
  • Marchesini Group Spa
  • Rapak
  • Ronchi Mario SpA
  • Wenzhou Runli Machinery Co. Ltd
  • Shanghai Dahe Packing Machinery Co. Ltd.
  • Shanghai Xingfei Packaging Machinery Co. Ltd.
  • Syntegon Technology GmbH
  • The Adelphi Group of Companies
  • Tetra Pak Group

Want to know more about the key vendor offerings and their impact analysis, Download Sample Now!

Filling Equipment Market Scope

Technavio presents a detailed picture of the market by the way of study, synthesis, and summation of data from multiple sources. Our filling equipment market report covers the following areas:

Filling Equipment Market Highlights

  • CAGR of the market during the forecast period 2022-2026
  • Detailed information on factors that will assist filling equipment market growth during the next five years
  • Estimation of the filling equipment market size and its contribution to the parent market
  • Predictions on upcoming trends and changes in consumer behavior
  • The growth of the filling equipment market
  • Analysis of the market's competitive landscape and detailed information on vendors
  • Comprehensive details of factors that will challenge the growth of filling equipment market vendors

Related Reports:

Power Drill Market by Product, Technology, and Geography - Forecast and Analysis 2022-2026

Metal Forming Machine Tools Market by End-user and Geography - Forecast and Analysis 2022-2026

 

Filling Equipment Market Scope

Report Coverage

Details

Page number

120

Base year

2021

Forecast period

2022-2026

Growth momentum & CAGR

Accelerate at a CAGR of 4.94%

Market growth 2022-2026

$ 2.17 billion

Market structure

Fragmented

YoY growth (%)

4.4

Regional analysis

APAC, Europe, North America, South America, and
Middle East and Africa

Performing market contribution

APAC at 44%

Key consumer countries

US, China, Japan, Germany, and Italy

Competitive landscape

Leading companies, competitive strategies, consumer
engagement scope

Companies profiled

 

 

 

ACASI Machinery Inc., Aetnagroup S.p.A., Barry-
Wehmiller Group Inc., Coesia SpA, E PAK Machinery
Inc., Feige FILLING GmbH, Filamatic, FILLING
EQUIPMENT Co. Inc., GEA Group Aktiengesellschaft,
John Bean Technologies Corp., KRONES AG,
Marchesini Group Spa, Rapak, Ronchi Mario SpA,
Wenzhou Runli Machinery Co. Ltd, Shanghai Dahe
Packing Machinery Co. Ltd., Shanghai Xingfei
Packaging Machinery Co. Ltd., Syntegon Technology
GmbH, The Adelphi Group of Companies, and Tetra
Pak Group

Market Dynamics

 

Parent market analysis, Market growth inducers
and obstacles, Fast-growing and slow-growing segment
analysis, COVID 19 impact and future consume
r dynamics, and market condition analysis for the
forecast period.

Customization purview

 

If our report has not included the data that you are
looking for, you can reach out to our analysts and get
segments customized.

 

Table Of Contents :

1 Executive Summary

  • 1.1 Market overview
    • Exhibit 01: Executive Summary – Chart on Market Overview
    • Exhibit 02: Executive Summary – Data Table on Market Overview
    • Exhibit 03: Executive Summary – Chart on Global Market Characteristics
    • Exhibit 04: Executive Summary – Chart on Market by Geography
    • Exhibit 05: Executive Summary – Chart on Market Segmentation by End-user
    • Exhibit 06: Executive Summary – Chart on Incremental Growth
    • Exhibit 07: Executive Summary – Data Table on Incremental Growth
    • Exhibit 08: Executive Summary – Chart on Vendor Market Positioning

2 Market Landscape

  • 2.1 Market ecosystem
    • Exhibit 09: Parent market
    • Exhibit 10: Market Characteristics

3 Market Sizing

  • 3.1 Market definition
    • Exhibit 11: Offerings of vendors included in the market definition
  • 3.2 Market segment analysis
    • Exhibit 12: Market segments
  • 3.3 Market size 2021
  • 3.4 Market outlook: Forecast for 2021-2026
    • Exhibit 13: Chart on Global - Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)
    • Exhibit 14: Data Table on Global - Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)
    • Exhibit 15: Chart on Global Market: Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)
    • Exhibit 16: Data Table on Global Market: Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)

4 Five Forces Analysis

  • 4.1 Five forces summary
    • Exhibit 17: Five forces analysis - Comparison between 2021 and 2026
  • 4.2 Bargaining power of buyers
    • Exhibit 18: Chart on Bargaining power of buyers – Impact of key factors 2021 and 2026
  • 4.3 Bargaining power of suppliers
    • Exhibit 19: Bargaining power of suppliers – Impact of key factors in 2021 and 2026
  • 4.4 Threat of new entrants
    • Exhibit 20: Threat of new entrants – Impact of key factors in 2021 and 2026
  • 4.5 Threat of substitutes
    • Exhibit 21: Threat of substitutes – Impact of key factors in 2021 and 2026
  • 4.6 Threat of rivalry
    • Exhibit 22: Threat of rivalry – Impact of key factors in 2021 and 2026
  • 4.7 Market condition
    • Exhibit 23: Chart on Market condition - Five forces 2021 and 2026

5 Market Segmentation by End-user

  • 5.1 Market segments
    • Exhibit 24: Chart on End-user - Market share 2021-2026 (%)
    • Exhibit 25: Data Table on End-user - Market share 2021-2026 (%)
  • 5.2 Comparison by End-user
    • Exhibit 26: Chart on Comparison by End-user
    • Exhibit 27: Data Table on Comparison by End-user
  • 5.3 Food and beverage - Market size and forecast 2021-2026
    • Exhibit 28: Chart on Food and beverage - Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)
    • Exhibit 29: Data Table on Food and beverage - Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)
    • Exhibit 30: Chart on Food and beverage - Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)
    • Exhibit 31: Data Table on Food and beverage - Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)
  • 5.4 Pharmaceutical - Market size and forecast 2021-2026
    • Exhibit 32: Chart on Pharmaceutical - Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)
    • Exhibit 33: Data Table on Pharmaceutical - Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)
    • Exhibit 34: Chart on Pharmaceutical - Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)
    • Exhibit 35: Data Table on Pharmaceutical - Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)
  • 5.5 Chemicals and petrochemicals - Market size and forecast 2021-2026
    • Exhibit 36: Chart on Chemicals and petrochemicals - Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)
    • Exhibit 37: Data Table on Chemicals and petrochemicals - Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)
    • Exhibit 38: Chart on Chemicals and petrochemicals - Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)
    • Exhibit 39: Data Table on Chemicals and petrochemicals - Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)
  • 5.6 Others - Market size and forecast 2021-2026
    • Exhibit 40: Chart on Others - Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)
    • Exhibit 41: Data Table on Others - Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)
    • Exhibit 42: Chart on Others - Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)
    • Exhibit 43: Data Table on Others - Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)
  • 5.7 Market opportunity by End-user
    • Exhibit 44: Market opportunity by End-user ($ million)

6 Customer Landscape

  • 6.1 Customer landscape overview
    • Exhibit 45: Analysis of price sensitivity, lifecycle, customer purchase basket, adoption rates, and purchase criteria

7 Geographic Landscape

  • 7.1 Geographic segmentation
    • Exhibit 46: Chart on Market share by geography 2021-2026 (%)
    • Exhibit 47: Data Table on Market share by geography 2021-2026 (%)
  • 7.2 Geographic comparison
    • Exhibit 48: Chart on Geographic comparison
    • Exhibit 49: Data Table on Geographic comparison
  • 7.3 APAC - Market size and forecast 2021-2026
    • Exhibit 50: Chart on APAC - Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)
    • Exhibit 51: Data Table on APAC - Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)
    • Exhibit 52: Chart on APAC - Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)
    • Exhibit 53: Data Table on APAC - Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)
  • 7.4 Europe - Market size and forecast 2021-2026
    • Exhibit 54: Chart on Europe - Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)
    • Exhibit 55: Data Table on Europe - Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)
    • Exhibit 56: Chart on Europe - Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)
    • Exhibit 57: Data Table on Europe - Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)
  • 7.5 North America - Market size and forecast 2021-2026
    • Exhibit 58: Chart on North America - Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)
    • Exhibit 59: Data Table on North America - Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)
    • Exhibit 60: Chart on North America - Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)
    • Exhibit 61: Data Table on North America - Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)
  • 7.6 South America - Market size and forecast 2021-2026
    • Exhibit 62: Chart on South America - Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)
    • Exhibit 63: Data Table on South America - Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)
    • Exhibit 64: Chart on South America - Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)
    • Exhibit 65: Data Table on South America - Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)
  • 7.7 Middle East and Africa - Market size and forecast 2021-2026
    • Exhibit 66: Chart on Middle East and Africa - Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)
    • Exhibit 67: Data Table on Middle East and Africa - Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)
    • Exhibit 68: Chart on Middle East and Africa - Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)
    • Exhibit 69: Data Table on Middle East and Africa - Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)
  • 7.8 China - Market size and forecast 2021-2026
    • Exhibit 70: Chart on China - Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)
    • Exhibit 71: Data Table on China - Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)
    • Exhibit 72: Chart on China - Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)
    • Exhibit 73: Data Table on China - Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)
  • 7.9 US - Market size and forecast 2021-2026
    • Exhibit 74: Chart on US - Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)
    • Exhibit 75: Data Table on US - Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)
    • Exhibit 76: Chart on US - Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)
    • Exhibit 77: Data Table on US - Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)
  • 7.10 Germany - Market size and forecast 2021-2026
    • Exhibit 78: Chart on Germany - Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)
    • Exhibit 79: Data Table on Germany - Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)
    • Exhibit 80: Chart on Germany - Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)
    • Exhibit 81: Data Table on Germany - Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)
  • 7.11 Italy - Market size and forecast 2021-2026
    • Exhibit 82: Chart on Italy - Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)
    • Exhibit 83: Data Table on Italy - Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)
    • Exhibit 84: Chart on Italy - Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)
    • Exhibit 85: Data Table on Italy - Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)
  • 7.12 Japan - Market size and forecast 2021-2026
    • Exhibit 86: Chart on Japan - Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)
    • Exhibit 87: Data Table on Japan - Market size and forecast 2021-2026 ($ million)
    • Exhibit 88: Chart on Japan - Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)
    • Exhibit 89: Data Table on Japan - Year-over-year growth 2021-2026 (%)
  • 7.13 Market opportunity by geography
    • Exhibit 90: Market opportunity by geography ($ million)

8 Drivers, Challenges, and Trends

  • 8.1 Market drivers
  • 8.2 Market challenges
  • 8.3 Impact of drivers and challenges
    • Exhibit 91: Impact of drivers and challenges in 2021 and 2026
  • 8.4 Market trends

9 Vendor Landscape

  • 9.1 Overview
  • 9.2 Vendor landscape
    • Exhibit 92: Overview on Criticality of inputs and Factors of differentiation
  • 9.3 Landscape disruption
    • Exhibit 93: Overview on factors of disruption
  • 9.4 Industry risks
    • Exhibit 94: Impact of key risks on business

10 Vendor Analysis

  • 10.1 Vendors covered
    • Exhibit 95: Vendors covered
  • 10.2 Market positioning of vendors
    • Exhibit 96: Matrix on vendor position and classification
  • 10.3 Aetnagroup S.p.A.
    • Exhibit 97: Aetnagroup S.p.A. - Overview
    • Exhibit 98: Aetnagroup S.p.A. - Product / Service
    • Exhibit 99: Aetnagroup S.p.A. - Key offerings
  • 10.4 Barry-Wehmiller Group Inc.
    • Exhibit 100: Barry-Wehmiller Group Inc. - Overview
    • Exhibit 101: Barry-Wehmiller Group Inc. - Product / Service
    • Exhibit 102: Barry-Wehmiller Group Inc. - Key offerings
  • 10.5 Coesia SpA
    • Exhibit 103: Coesia SpA - Overview
    • Exhibit 104: Coesia SpA - Business segments
    • Exhibit 105: Coesia SpA - Key news
    • Exhibit 106: Coesia SpA - Key offerings
    • Exhibit 107: Coesia SpA - Segment focus
  • 10.6 GEA Group Aktiengesellschaft
    • Exhibit 108: GEA Group Aktiengesellschaft - Overview
    • Exhibit 109: GEA Group Aktiengesellschaft - Business segments
    • Exhibit 110: GEA Group Aktiengesellschaft - Key news
    • Exhibit 111: GEA Group Aktiengesellschaft - Key offerings
    • Exhibit 112: GEA Group Aktiengesellschaft - Segment focus
  • 10.7 John Bean Technologies Corp.
    • Exhibit 113: John Bean Technologies Corp. - Overview
    • Exhibit 114: John Bean Technologies Corp. - Business segments
    • Exhibit 115: John Bean Technologies Corp. - Key offerings
    • Exhibit 116: John Bean Technologies Corp. - Segment focus
  • 10.8 KRONES AG
    • Exhibit 117: KRONES AG - Overview
    • Exhibit 118: KRONES AG - Business segments
    • Exhibit 119: KRONES AG - Key offerings
    • Exhibit 120: KRONES AG - Segment focus
  • 10.9 Marchesini Group Spa
    • Exhibit 121: Marchesini Group Spa - Overview
    • Exhibit 122: Marchesini Group Spa - Product / Service
    • Exhibit 123: Marchesini Group Spa - Key offerings
  • 10.10 Syntegon Technology GmbH
    • Exhibit 124: Syntegon Technology GmbH - Overview
    • Exhibit 125: Syntegon Technology GmbH - Product / Service
    • Exhibit 126: Syntegon Technology GmbH - Key offerings
  • 10.11 Tetra Pak Group
    • Exhibit 127: Tetra Pak Group - Overview
    • Exhibit 128: Tetra Pak Group - Business segments
    • Exhibit 129: Tetra Pak Group - Key news
    • Exhibit 130: Tetra Pak Group - Key offerings
    • Exhibit 131: Tetra Pak Group - Segment focus
  • 10.12 The Adelphi Group of Companies
    • Exhibit 132: The Adelphi Group of Companies - Overview
    • Exhibit 133: The Adelphi Group of Companies - Product / Service
    • Exhibit 134: The Adelphi Group of Companies - Key offerings

11 Appendix

  • 11.1 Scope of the report
  • 11.2 Inclusions and exclusions checklist
    • Exhibit 135: Inclusions checklist
    • Exhibit 136: Exclusions checklist
  • 11.3 Currency conversion rates for US$
    • Exhibit 137: Currency conversion rates for US$
  • 11.4 Research methodology
    • Exhibit 138: Research methodology
    • Exhibit 139: Validation techniques employed for market sizing
    • Exhibit 140: Information sources
  • 11.5 List of abbreviations
    • Exhibit 141: List of abbreviations
  • In manufacturing industry: Market dynamics in some major processes and discrete industries are changing drastically, and manufacturers are gradually feeling the brunt of excessive demand fluctuations. The fluctuating prices of oil and gas and metals in the global market and the shortage of a skilled workforce worldwide have directly affected the profitability of manufacturing companies. A sudden and unexpected shift in market dynamics can drastically impact manufacturing processes and investments in capital goods.
  • Slowdown in the automotive industry: High motorization rates in North America and Europe, the increase in tariffs on imported vehicles in the US and China, and the global economic slowdown are likely to reduce vehicle sales in the coming years. Anticipating a decline in vehicle sales, several vehicle manufacturers are halting their vehicle production. For instance, in March 2019, Ford announced the shutdown of its three vehicle-manufacturing sites in Russia. Similarly, in August 2019, Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. stopped vehicle production at its manufacturing units in India for 8-14 days. During the same month, Maruti Suzuki announced that it had cut its vehicle production for the sixth consecutive month in 2019. In August 2019, Honda announced a halt in car production at its Argentina-based manufacturing plants. Such a slowdown in the automotive industry is expected to hamper the growth of the market during the forecast period.

About Us
Technavio is a leading global technology research and advisory company. Their research and analysis focus on emerging market trends and provide actionable insights to help businesses identify market opportunities and develop effective strategies to optimize their market positions. With over 500 specialized analysts, Technavio's report library consists of more than 17,000 reports and counting, covering 800 technologies, spanning 50 countries. Their client base consists of enterprises of all sizes, including more than 100 Fortune 500 companies. This growing client base relies on Technavio's comprehensive coverage, extensive research, and actionable market insights to identify opportunities in existing and potential markets and assess their competitive positions within changing market scenarios.

Contact
Technavio Research
Jesse Maida
Media & Marketing Executive
US: +1 844 364 1100
UK: +44 203 893 3200
Email: media@technavio.com
Website: www.technavio.com/

View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/filling-equipment-market-size-to-grow-by-usd-2-17-billion-with-44-of-the-contribution-from-apac---technavio-301609586.html

SOURCE Technavio

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

CDC Warns Thousands Of Children Sent To ER After Taking Common Sleep Aid

CDC Warns Thousands Of Children Sent To ER After Taking Common Sleep Aid

Authored by Jack Phillips via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

A…

Published

on

CDC Warns Thousands Of Children Sent To ER After Taking Common Sleep Aid

Authored by Jack Phillips via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

A U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) paper released Thursday found that thousands of young children have been taken to the emergency room over the past several years after taking the very common sleep-aid supplement melatonin.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) headquarters in Atlanta, Georgia, on April 23, 2020. (Tami Chappell/AFP via Getty Images)

The agency said that melatonin, which can come in gummies that are meant for adults, was implicated in about 7 percent of all emergency room visits for young children and infants “for unsupervised medication ingestions,” adding that many incidents were linked to the ingestion of gummy formulations that were flavored. Those incidents occurred between the years 2019 and 2022.

Melatonin is a hormone produced by the human body to regulate its sleep cycle. Supplements, which are sold in a number of different formulas, are generally taken before falling asleep and are popular among people suffering from insomnia, jet lag, chronic pain, or other problems.

The supplement isn’t regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and does not require child-resistant packaging. However, a number of supplement companies include caps or lids that are difficult for children to open.

The CDC report said that a significant number of melatonin-ingestion cases among young children were due to the children opening bottles that had not been properly closed or were within their reach. Thursday’s report, the agency said, “highlights the importance of educating parents and other caregivers about keeping all medications and supplements (including gummies) out of children’s reach and sight,” including melatonin.

The approximately 11,000 emergency department visits for unsupervised melatonin ingestions by infants and young children during 2019–2022 highlight the importance of educating parents and other caregivers about keeping all medications and supplements (including gummies) out of children’s reach and sight.

The CDC notes that melatonin use among Americans has increased five-fold over the past 25 years or so. That has coincided with a 530 percent increase in poison center calls for melatonin exposures to children between 2012 and 2021, it said, as well as a 420 percent increase in emergency visits for unsupervised melatonin ingestion by young children or infants between 2009 and 2020.

Some health officials advise that children under the age of 3 should avoid taking melatonin unless a doctor says otherwise. Side effects include drowsiness, headaches, agitation, dizziness, and bed wetting.

Other symptoms of too much melatonin include nausea, diarrhea, joint pain, anxiety, and irritability. The supplement can also impact blood pressure.

However, there is no established threshold for a melatonin overdose, officials have said. Most adult melatonin supplements contain a maximum of 10 milligrams of melatonin per serving, and some contain less.

Many people can tolerate even relatively large doses of melatonin without significant harm, officials say. But there is no antidote for an overdose. In cases of a child accidentally ingesting melatonin, doctors often ask a reliable adult to monitor them at home.

Dr. Cora Collette Breuner, with the Seattle Children’s Hospital at the University of Washington, told CNN that parents should speak with a doctor before giving their children the supplement.

“I also tell families, this is not something your child should take forever. Nobody knows what the long-term effects of taking this is on your child’s growth and development,” she told the outlet. “Taking away blue-light-emitting smartphones, tablets, laptops, and television at least two hours before bed will keep melatonin production humming along, as will reading or listening to bedtime stories in a softly lit room, taking a warm bath, or doing light stretches.”

In 2022, researchers found that in 2021, U.S. poison control centers received more than 52,000 calls about children consuming worrisome amounts of the dietary supplement. That’s a six-fold increase from about a decade earlier. Most such calls are about young children who accidentally got into bottles of melatonin, some of which come in the form of gummies for kids, the report said.

Dr. Karima Lelak, an emergency physician at Children’s Hospital of Michigan and the lead author of the study published in 2022 by the CDC, found that in about 83 percent of those calls, the children did not show any symptoms.

However, other children had vomiting, altered breathing, or other symptoms. Over the 10 years studied, more than 4,000 children were hospitalized, five were put on machines to help them breathe, and two children under the age of two died. Most of the hospitalized children were teenagers, and many of those ingestions were thought to be suicide attempts.

Those researchers also suggested that COVID-19 lockdowns and virtual learning forced more children to be at home all day, meaning there were more opportunities for kids to access melatonin. Also, those restrictions may have caused sleep-disrupting stress and anxiety, leading more families to consider melatonin, they suggested.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Tyler Durden Mon, 03/11/2024 - 21:40

Read More

Continue Reading

International

Red Candle In The Wind

Red Candle In The Wind

By Benjamin PIcton of Rabobank

February non-farm payrolls superficially exceeded market expectations on Friday by…

Published

on

Red Candle In The Wind

By Benjamin PIcton of Rabobank

February non-farm payrolls superficially exceeded market expectations on Friday by printing at 275,000 against a consensus call of 200,000. We say superficially, because the downward revisions to prior months totalled 167,000 for December and January, taking the total change in employed persons well below the implied forecast, and helping the unemployment rate to pop two-ticks to 3.9%. The U6 underemployment rate also rose from 7.2% to 7.3%, while average hourly earnings growth fell to 0.2% m-o-m and average weekly hours worked languished at 34.3, equalling pre-pandemic lows.

Undeterred by the devil in the detail, the algos sprang into action once exchanges opened. Market darling NVIDIA hit a new intraday high of $974 before (presumably) the humans took over and sold the stock down more than 10% to close at $875.28. If our suspicions are correct that it was the AIs buying before the humans started selling (no doubt triggering trailing stops on the way down), the irony is not lost on us.

The 1-day chart for NVIDIA now makes for interesting viewing, because the red candle posted on Friday presents quite a strong bearish engulfing signal. Volume traded on the day was almost double the 15-day simple moving average, and similar price action is observable on the 1-day charts for both Intel and AMD. Regular readers will be aware that we have expressed incredulity in the past about the durability the AI thematic melt-up, so it will be interesting to see whether Friday’s sell off is just a profit-taking blip, or a genuine trend reversal.

AI equities aside, this week ought to be important for markets because the BTFP program expires today. That means that the Fed will no longer be loaning cash to the banking system in exchange for collateral pledged at-par. The KBW Regional Banking index has so far taken this in its stride and is trading 30% above the lows established during the mini banking crisis of this time last year, but the Fed’s liquidity facility was effectively an exercise in can-kicking that makes regional banks a sector of the market worth paying attention to in the weeks ahead. Even here in Sydney, regulators are warning of external risks posed to the banking sector from scheduled refinancing of commercial real estate loans following sharp falls in valuations.

Markets are sending signals in other sectors, too. Gold closed at a new record-high of $2178/oz on Friday after trading above $2200/oz briefly. Gold has been going ballistic since the Friday before last, posting gains even on days where 2-year Treasury yields have risen. Gold bugs are buying as real yields fall from the October highs and inflation breakevens creep higher. This is particularly interesting as gold ETFs have been recording net outflows; suggesting that price gains aren’t being driven by a retail pile-in. Are gold buyers now betting on a stagflationary outcome where the Fed cuts without inflation being anchored at the 2% target? The price action around the US CPI release tomorrow ought to be illuminating.

Leaving the day-to-day movements to one side, we are also seeing further signs of structural change at the macro level. The UK budget last week included a provision for the creation of a British ISA. That is, an Individual Savings Account that provides tax breaks to savers who invest their money in the stock of British companies. This follows moves last year to encourage pension funds to head up the risk curve by allocating 5% of their capital to unlisted investments.

As a Hail Mary option for a government cruising toward an electoral drubbing it’s a curious choice, but it’s worth highlighting as cash-strapped governments increasingly see private savings pools as a funding solution for their spending priorities.

Of course, the UK is not alone in making creeping moves towards financial repression. In contrast to announcements today of increased trade liberalisation, Australian Treasurer Jim Chalmers has in the recent past flagged his interest in tapping private pension savings to fund state spending priorities, including defence, public housing and renewable energy projects. Both the UK and Australia appear intent on finding ways to open up the lungs of their economies, but government wants more say in directing private capital flows for state goals.

So, how far is the blurring of the lines between free markets and state planning likely to go? Given the immense and varied budgetary (and security) pressures that governments are facing, could we see a re-up of WWII-era Victory bonds, where private investors are encouraged to do their patriotic duty by directly financing government at negative real rates?

That would really light a fire under the gold market.

Tyler Durden Mon, 03/11/2024 - 19:00

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

Fauci Deputy Warned Him Against Vaccine Mandates: Email

Fauci Deputy Warned Him Against Vaccine Mandates: Email

Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

Mandating COVID-19…

Published

on

Fauci Deputy Warned Him Against Vaccine Mandates: Email

Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

Mandating COVID-19 vaccination was a mistake due to ethical and other concerns, a top government doctor warned Dr. Anthony Fauci after Dr. Fauci promoted mass vaccination.

Coercing or forcing people to take a vaccine can have negative consequences from a biological, sociological, psychological, economical, and ethical standpoint and is not worth the cost even if the vaccine is 100% safe,” Dr. Matthew Memoli, director of the Laboratory of Infectious Diseases clinical studies unit at the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), told Dr. Fauci in an email.

“A more prudent approach that considers these issues would be to focus our efforts on those at high risk of severe disease and death, such as the elderly and obese, and do not push vaccination on the young and healthy any further.”

Dr. Anthony Fauci, ex-director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID. in Washington on Jan. 8, 2024. (Madalina Vasiliu/The Epoch Times)

Employing that strategy would help prevent loss of public trust and political capital, Dr. Memoli said.

The email was sent on July 30, 2021, after Dr. Fauci, director of the NIAID, claimed that communities would be safer if more people received one of the COVID-19 vaccines and that mass vaccination would lead to the end of the COVID-19 pandemic.

“We’re on a really good track now to really crush this outbreak, and the more people we get vaccinated, the more assuredness that we’re going to have that we’re going to be able to do that,” Dr. Fauci said on CNN the month prior.

Dr. Memoli, who has studied influenza vaccination for years, disagreed, telling Dr. Fauci that research in the field has indicated yearly shots sometimes drive the evolution of influenza.

Vaccinating people who have not been infected with COVID-19, he said, could potentially impact the evolution of the virus that causes COVID-19 in unexpected ways.

“At best what we are doing with mandated mass vaccination does nothing and the variants emerge evading immunity anyway as they would have without the vaccine,” Dr. Memoli wrote. “At worst it drives evolution of the virus in a way that is different from nature and possibly detrimental, prolonging the pandemic or causing more morbidity and mortality than it should.”

The vaccination strategy was flawed because it relied on a single antigen, introducing immunity that only lasted for a certain period of time, Dr. Memoli said. When the immunity weakened, the virus was given an opportunity to evolve.

Some other experts, including virologist Geert Vanden Bossche, have offered similar views. Others in the scientific community, such as U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention scientists, say vaccination prevents virus evolution, though the agency has acknowledged it doesn’t have records supporting its position.

Other Messages

Dr. Memoli sent the email to Dr. Fauci and two other top NIAID officials, Drs. Hugh Auchincloss and Clifford Lane. The message was first reported by the Wall Street Journal, though the publication did not publish the message. The Epoch Times obtained the email and 199 other pages of Dr. Memoli’s emails through a Freedom of Information Act request. There were no indications that Dr. Fauci ever responded to Dr. Memoli.

Later in 2021, the NIAID’s parent agency, the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH), and all other federal government agencies began requiring COVID-19 vaccination, under direction from President Joe Biden.

In other messages, Dr. Memoli said the mandates were unethical and that he was hopeful legal cases brought against the mandates would ultimately let people “make their own healthcare decisions.”

“I am certainly doing everything in my power to influence that,” he wrote on Nov. 2, 2021, to an unknown recipient. Dr. Memoli also disclosed that both he and his wife had applied for exemptions from the mandates imposed by the NIH and his wife’s employer. While her request had been granted, his had not as of yet, Dr. Memoli said. It’s not clear if it ever was.

According to Dr. Memoli, officials had not gone over the bioethics of the mandates. He wrote to the NIH’s Department of Bioethics, pointing out that the protection from the vaccines waned over time, that the shots can cause serious health issues such as myocarditis, or heart inflammation, and that vaccinated people were just as likely to spread COVID-19 as unvaccinated people.

He cited multiple studies in his emails, including one that found a resurgence of COVID-19 cases in a California health care system despite a high rate of vaccination and another that showed transmission rates were similar among the vaccinated and unvaccinated.

Dr. Memoli said he was “particularly interested in the bioethics of a mandate when the vaccine doesn’t have the ability to stop spread of the disease, which is the purpose of the mandate.”

The message led to Dr. Memoli speaking during an NIH event in December 2021, several weeks after he went public with his concerns about mandating vaccines.

“Vaccine mandates should be rare and considered only with a strong justification,” Dr. Memoli said in the debate. He suggested that the justification was not there for COVID-19 vaccines, given their fleeting effectiveness.

Julie Ledgerwood, another NIAID official who also spoke at the event, said that the vaccines were highly effective and that the side effects that had been detected were not significant. She did acknowledge that vaccinated people needed boosters after a period of time.

The NIH, and many other government agencies, removed their mandates in 2023 with the end of the COVID-19 public health emergency.

A request for comment from Dr. Fauci was not returned. Dr. Memoli told The Epoch Times in an email he was “happy to answer any questions you have” but that he needed clearance from the NIAID’s media office. That office then refused to give clearance.

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, a professor of health policy at Stanford University, said that Dr. Memoli showed bravery when he warned Dr. Fauci against mandates.

“Those mandates have done more to demolish public trust in public health than any single action by public health officials in my professional career, including diminishing public trust in all vaccines.” Dr. Bhattacharya, a frequent critic of the U.S. response to COVID-19, told The Epoch Times via email. “It was risky for Dr. Memoli to speak publicly since he works at the NIH, and the culture of the NIH punishes those who cross powerful scientific bureaucrats like Dr. Fauci or his former boss, Dr. Francis Collins.”

Tyler Durden Mon, 03/11/2024 - 17:40

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending