Connect with us

International

Federal Reserve KaPow-ells Markets

Federal Reserve KaPow-ells Markets

Published

on

The Federal Chairman Jerome Powell sent markets lower overnight with a three-punch combination that would have done Batman proud. Chairman Powell firstly poured water on the prospect of negative interest rates from the Fed, saying that the evidence the policy is effective is marginal. Secondly, he stated that the post-virus growth and recovery would be lower for longer. Thirdly, and in my mind, much more importantly, he urged the Federal Government to enact more fiscal support and set aside bipartisanship to get the job done.

The last statement is significant, representing for the first time, a rather forceful statement that the Federal Reserve could not do the job alone, and cutting straight to the heart of much of the criticism of the Federal government’s coronavirus response to date. Indeed, the US President last night said that the latest Democratic crafted stimulus bill was “dead on arrival.” To be fair to President Trump, the proposed legislation had been crafted by the Democrats alone, with not a shred of bipartisan participation. A necessary cornerstone of any fiscal response legislation in these times.

President Trump himself sent some shivers through markets. Labelling his advisor, Dr Anthony Fauci’s warnings on the premature reopening of state economies, unacceptable. He also waded into China, criticising their adherence to the trade deal and labelling coronavirus “the Chinese plague.” None of the above was viewed as particularly constructive by markets, who promptly voted with their feet and pressed the sell button.

The clouds in Asia have not lifted today with more bad news emerging from down under. Australia Employment for April fell by an astounding 594,000 jobs with the ABS saying the number is probably worse than the headline. New Zealand also announced its budget statement. New Zealand will issue NZD 165 billion of government bonds over the next four years, and government debt as a percentage of GDP will rise from 19% to 56%. That unwinds perhaps decades of hard work by successive New Zealand government to reduce the national debt, although that number still leaves the Kiwis in a better fiscal position than most.

What it does illustrate though, is the economic toll the coronavirus pandemic will wreck on national budgets across the globe, and the long recovery ahead. It perhaps also shows the disconnect of the peak virus FOMO trade so beloved of financial markets over the last month, from the cold hard reality on the ground. Government borrowing requirements around the world will aggressively compete with, and possibly crowd out, the private sectors for many years to come unless the globe can generate a few years of juicy inflation to deflate the whole mess.

Asia and Europe’s data for today is mostly 2nd tier, with most attention on the US Initial Jobless Claims for the week this evening. Another 3.5 million jobs are forecast to have been lost, although pundits may point to a falling trend continuing, that number being lower than the previous of 4.2 million jobs. That is unless you are one of those people that make up those statistics.

Asia’s highlight for the week will arrive tomorrow morning with the release of China’s Industrial Production and Retail Sales for April. Industrial Production is predicted to rise by 1.50%, versus last month’s 1.10% fall. Retail sales are expected to have fallen by 7%, better than March’s 15.80% fall. With so much expected of China to lead the world out of the global economic slump, on a first-in, first-out basis, poor numbers may continue to erode the confidence of the market’s peak virus trade.

Asian equities head South after Wall Street sell-off.

Wall Street gave up more of its recent gains overnight following comments from the Federal Reserve and the US President. The S&P 500 fell by 1,75%, with the NASDAQ dropping 1.50% and the Dow Jones falling 2.19%.

Asia today is a sea of red, although like yesterday, it is not reflecting the extent of the Wall Street retreat. The Nikkei 225 is 0.70% lower; the Kospi is 1.10% lower with China’s Shanghai Composite down 0.85%, and the CSI 300 down 0.80%. Singapore has fallen 1.25%, with Jakarta and Kuala Lumpur both 0.40% lower. The Australian All Ordinaries has declined 1.10%, with the ASX 200 down 1.25%. The NZX 50 has weathered the storm comparatively, down 0.20% after the government budget announcement; possibly supported by the prospect of interest rates being much lower for longer and an uber dovish RBNZ yesterday.

The scale of the recovery in global equities since the mid-March nadir, renders the falls of the past two days remain almost inconsequential. It is still not clear as yet, whether this is merely corrective unwinding of extended long positioning, or whether the peak virus trade has indeed run its course for now with equity markets being to align with the economic reality in the real world. What is clear is that nervousness has increased and that equity markets are far more susceptible to negative headlines than they have been at any stage in the past few weeks.

US Dollar rises on defensive rotation.

The US Dollar edged higher against the major currencies overnight, with the dollar index rising 0.28% to 100.21 and the EUR/USD falling to 1.0820, giving up much of its recent days’ gains. A fall in oil prices overnight saw the Dollar also record substantial gains against petro and emerging markets currencies.

That defensive tone has continued into Asia with USD/IDR, USD/KRW and USD/MYR rising by 0.20%. USD/JPY has fallen 0.15% to 106.90 as Japanese investors also buy the safe-haven Yen. USD/CNH though remains becalmed mid-range at 7.1000. USD/CNH has been locked between 7.0500 and 7.1500 for almost two months, and only a rise through 7.2000 is likely to set alarm bells ringing in the near-term. That looks unlikely as the Chinese look to damp anti-China rhetoric from the US.

Both the Australian and New Zealand Dollars remain under pressure this morning following yesterday’s significant falls. The NZD/USD is eroding support at 0.5990 with .5900 it’s next technical target. The AUD/USD has eased another 0.25% lower to 0.6435 today post the employment data. Support lies at 0.6375 and then 0.6300.

The US Dollar should continue to outperform into Europe with markets increasingly nervous about the longevity of the peak virus trade.

Oil almost unchanged in Asia after falling overnight.

A fall in US crude inventories overnight could not undo the damage of Jerome Powell’s comments, with the Chairman’s dose of reality leading to the further unwinding of speculative longs on Brent Crude and WTI. Brent crude fell by 2.20% to $29.30 a barrel, with WTI falling by a lesser 1.10% to $25.50 a barrel. Asia is having a quiet session though, with both contracts almost unchanged throughout the morning session.

The technical picture suggests that further downside correction is imminent on both contracts as markets start to get cold feet on the global recovery trade. Brent crude tested and failed $32.00 a barrel twice last week, and the price action since has been a series of lower highs. The 50-day moving average is at $29.10 a barrel today and has been moving lower the past week as well, capping intra-day gains. Support is very nearby at $28.80 a barrel, with a break opening a test of $28.00 a barrel. Should that level give way, a deeper correction $25.50 a barrel could be imminent.

WTI has failed twice ahead of $28.00 a barrel and has resistance at $29.00 a barrel. Support is nearby in the $24.50 a barrel area, and a break of that level suggests further losses to $23.50 a barrel. A loss of $23.50 opens the possibility of a much deeper correction to the $20.00 a barrel region.

Overall, oil is at its most vulnerable to adverse headline developments; then it has been for the past two weeks.

Gold rises on Powell comments overnight.

Gold climbed by just shy of 1.0% overnight, to $1715.50 an ounce, after the Federal Reserve’s call for more bi-partisan fiscal stimulus from the US Government. The reality though is that gold remains locked in a range trading scenario, with the overnight range, roughly average for the past month. I will reiterate, it is essential to differentiate between swings in daily sentiment and a structural change in gold prices. If we remain locked between $1650.00 and $1750.00 an ounce, we are in the former, and not the latter scenario. That said, the technical picture is, at last, becoming more interesting.

Gold has technical resistance at $1725.00 and then $1750.00 an ounce. Support today, from an ascending line, comes in at $1700.00 an ounce. Gold is forming an ascending wedge, made up of a two-week series of higher lows. That implies that a more substantial move is on the way. A break of $1725.00 an ounce implies a test of the significant $1750.00 resistance zone. Conversely, a daily close under $1700.00 an ounce, suggests a deeper correction to $1675.00 an ounce, and possibly as far at $1650.00 an ounce. I also note that the 50-day moving average is also at $1650.00 an ounce now, increasing the importance of this level to remain intact for bullish gold positioning.

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

Small Business Bankruptcies Surge In 2023, Five Reasons Why

Small Business Bankruptcies Surge In 2023, Five Reasons Why

Authored by Mike Shedlock via MishTalk.com,

Small business bankruptcies are at…

Published

on

Small Business Bankruptcies Surge In 2023, Five Reasons Why

Authored by Mike Shedlock via MishTalk.com,

Small business bankruptcies are at a much higher pace than any year since the Covid pandemic...

Small business bankruptcies from the American Bankruptcy Institute via the Wall Street Journal

The Wall Street Journal reports There’s No Soft Landing for These Businesses

Nearly 1,500 small businesses filed for Subchapter V bankruptcy this year through Sept. 28, nearly as many as in all of 2022, according to the American Bankruptcy Institute.

Bankruptcy petitions are just one sign of financial stress. Small-business loan delinquencies and defaults have edged upward since June 2022 and are now above prepandemic averages, according to Equifax.

An index tracking small-business owners’ confidence ticked down slightly in September, driven by heightened concerns about the economy, according to a survey of more than 750 small businesses. Fifty-two percent of respondents believed that the country is approaching or in a recession, said the survey by Vistage Worldwide, a business-coaching and peer-advisory firm.

Robert Gonzales, a bankruptcy attorney in Nashville, said he’s now getting four times as many calls as he did a year ago from small businesses considering a bankruptcy filing.

“We are just at the front end of the impact of these dramatically higher interest rates,” Gonzales said. “There are going to be plenty of small businesses that are overleveraged.”

Five Reasons for Surge in Bankruptcies

  • Rising Interest Rates

  • Surging Wages

  • Tighter Bank Credit

  • Overleverage

  • Work-at-Home Curtailing Demand

Fed Rate Interest Rate Hike Expectations Are Still Higher for Even Longer

The Fed has hiked interest rates to 5.25% to 5.50%. It’s the highest in 22 years.

And Fed Rate Interest Rate Hike Expectations Are Still Higher for Even Longer

Surge in Wages

Minimum wages have surged. Unions are piling on. Small businesses have to offer prevailing wages or they cannot get workers.

In California, Minimum Wage for Fast Food Workers Jumps 30% to $20 Per Hour. Governor Gavib Newsom called it a “big deal”, I responded:

A Big Deal Indeed, Expect More Inflation

Yes, governor, this is very big deal. It will increase the cost of eating out everywhere.

The bill Newsom signed only applies to restaurants that have at least 60 locations nationwide — with an exception for restaurants that make and sell their own bread, like Panera Bread (what’s that exception all about?)

Nonetheless, the bill will force many small restaurants out of business or they will pony up too.

30 Percent Raise Coming Up!

If McDonalds pays $20, why take $15.50 elsewhere?

The $4.50 hike from $15.50 to $20 is a massive 30 percent jump.

Expect prices at all restaurant to rise. Then think ahead. This extra money is certain to increase demands for all goods and services, so guess what.

Other states will follow California.

Biden Newsome Tag Team

Biden’s energy policies have made the US less secure on oil, more dependent on China for materials needed to make batteries, fueled a surge in inflation, and ironically did not do a damn thing for the environment, arguably making matters worse.

See  The Shocking Truth About Biden’s Proposed Energy Fuel Standards for discussion of the administration’s admitted impacts of Biden’s mileage mandates.

Newsom is doing everything he can to make things even worse.

The tag team of Biden and Newsom is an inflationary sight to behold.

Bank Credit and Over-Leverage

In the wake of the failure of Silicon Valley Bank, across the board small regional banks are curtailing credit.

The regional banks over-leveraged on interest rate bets. And businesses overleveraged too, getting caught up in work-from-home environments that curtailed demand for some goods and services.

The bankruptcies will fall hard on the regional banks.

Add it all up and things rate to get worse.

Tyler Durden Mon, 10/02/2023 - 15:40

Read More

Continue Reading

International

Fair and sustainable futures beyond mining

Mining brings huge social and environmental change to communities: landscapes, livelihoods and the social fabric evolve alongside the industry. But what…

Published

on

Mining brings huge social and environmental change to communities: landscapes, livelihoods and the social fabric evolve alongside the industry. But what happens when the mines close? What problems face communities that lose their main employer and the very core of their identity and social networks? A research fellow at the University of Göttingen provides recommendations for governments to successfully navigate mining communities through their transition toward non-mining economies. Based on past experiences with industrial transitions, she suggests that a three-step approach centred around stakeholder collaboration could be the most effective way forward. This approach combines early planning, local-based solutions, and targeted investments aimed at fostering economic and workforce transformation. This comment article was published in Nature Energy.

Credit: Kamila Svobodova

Mining brings huge social and environmental change to communities: landscapes, livelihoods and the social fabric evolve alongside the industry. But what happens when the mines close? What problems face communities that lose their main employer and the very core of their identity and social networks? A research fellow at the University of Göttingen provides recommendations for governments to successfully navigate mining communities through their transition toward non-mining economies. Based on past experiences with industrial transitions, she suggests that a three-step approach centred around stakeholder collaboration could be the most effective way forward. This approach combines early planning, local-based solutions, and targeted investments aimed at fostering economic and workforce transformation. This comment article was published in Nature Energy.

 

Dr Kamila Svobodova, Marie Skłodowska-Curie Research Fellow at the University of Göttingen, argues that, in practice, governments struggle to truly engage mining communities in both legislation and action. Even the more successful, often deemed exemplary, transitions failed to follow the principles of open and just participation or invest enough time in the process. Early discussions about how the future will look following closure help to build trust and relationships with communities. A combination of bottom-up and top-down approaches engages people at all levels. This ensures that the local context is understood and targeted specifically. It also establishes networks for collaboration during the transition. Effective coordination of investments toward mining communities, including funding to implement measures to support workers, seed new industries, support innovations, and enhance essential services in urban centres, proved to be successful in the past.

 

“To ensure energy security, it’s essential for governments to recognize the profound transformation that residents of mining communities experience when they shift away from mining,” Svobodova explains. “Neglecting these communities, their inherent strength of mining identity and unity, could lead to social and economic instability, potentially affecting the overall national energy infrastructure.”

 

Moving toward closure and consequently away from mining is not an easy or short journey. “It is essential that governments recognize that the transition takes time, and persistence is essential for success,” says Svoboda. “They should openly communicate their strategies, ensuring communities and other stakeholders are well-informed and engaged. Building trust and providing guidance helps residents navigate the uncertainties associated with transitions. By embracing the three-step approach that centers around stakeholder engagement, governments can prioritize equitable and just outcomes when navigating mining transitions as part of their energy security strategies.”

 

Original publication: Svobodova, K., “Navigating community transitions away from mining,” Comment article in Nature Energy 2023. DOI: 10.1038/s41560-023-01359-9. Full text available here: https://rdcu.be/dnmU3 

 

Contact:

Dr Kamila Svobodova

University of Göttingen

Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development

Platz der Göttinger Sieben 5, 37073 Göttingen, Germany

kamila.svobodova@uni-goettingen.de

 


Read More

Continue Reading

Government

Turley: Four Biden Impeachment Articles & What The House Will Need To Prove

Turley: Four Biden Impeachment Articles & What The House Will Need To Prove

Authored by Jonathan Turley,

With the commencement of the…

Published

on

Turley: Four Biden Impeachment Articles & What The House Will Need To Prove

Authored by Jonathan Turley,

With the commencement of the impeachment inquiry into the conduct of President Joe Biden, three House committees will now pursue key linkages between the president and the massive influence peddling operation run by his son Hunter and brother James.

The impeachment inquiry should allow the House to finally acquire long-sought records of Hunter, James, and Joe Biden, as well as to pursue witnesses involved in their dealings.

testified this week at the first hearing of the impeachment inquiry on the constitutional standards and practices in moving forward in the investigation. In my view, there is ample justification for an impeachment inquiry. If these allegations are established, they would clearly constitute impeachable offenses. I listed ten of those facts in my testimony that alone were sufficient to move forward with this inquiry.

I was criticized by both the left and the right for the testimony. 

Steven Bannon and others were upset that I did not believe that the basis for impeachment had already been established in the first hearing of the inquiry.

Others were angry that I supported the House efforts to resolve these questions of public corruption.

Without prejudging that evidence, there are four obvious potential articles of impeachment that have been raised in recent disclosures and sworn statements:

  1. bribery,

  2. conspiracy,

  3. obstruction, and

  4. abuse of power.

Bribery is the second impeachable act listed under Article II. The allegation that the President received a bribe worth millions was documented on a FD-1023 form by a trusted FBI source who was paid a significant amount of money by the government. There remain many details that would have to be confirmed in order to turn such an allegation into an article of impeachment.

Yet three facts are now unassailable.

First, Biden has lied about key facts related to these foreign dealings, including false statements flagged by the Washington Post.

Second, the president was indeed the focus of a corrupt multimillion-dollar influence peddling scheme.

Third, Biden may have benefitted from this corruption through millions of dollars sent to his family as well as more direct benefit to Joe and Jill Biden.

What must be established is the President’s knowledge of or participation in this corrupt scheme. The House now has confirmed over 20 calls made to meetings and dinners with these foreign clients. It has confirmation of visits to the White House and dinners and events attended by Joe Biden. It also has confirmation of trips on Air Force II by Hunter to facilitate these deals, as well as payments where the President’s Delaware home address was used as late as 2019 for transfers from China.

The most serious allegations concern reported Washington calls or meetings by Hunter at the behest of these foreign figures. At least one of those calls concerned the removal or isolation of a Ukrainian prosecutor investigating Burisma, an energy company paying Hunter as a board member. A few days later, Biden withheld a billion dollars in an approved loan to Ukrainian in order to force the firing of the prosecutor.

The House will need to strengthen the nexus with the president in seeking firsthand accounts of these meetings, calls, and transfers.

However, there is one thing that the House does not have to do. While there are references to Joe Biden receiving money from Hunter and other benefits (including a proposed ten percent from one of these foreign deals), he has already been shown to have benefited from these transfers.

There is a false narrative being pushed by both politicians and pundits that there is no basis for an inquiry, let alone an impeachment, unless a direct payment or gift can be shown to Joe Biden. That would certainly strengthen the case politically, but it is not essential legally. Even in criminal cases subject to the highest standard, payments to family members can be treated as benefits to a principal actor. Direct benefits can further strengthen articles of impeachment, but they would not be a prerequisite for such an action.

For example, in Ryan v. United States, the Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals upheld the conviction of George Ryan, formerly Secretary of State and then governor of Illinois, partly on account of benefits paid to his family, including the hiring of a band at his daughter’s wedding and other “undisclosed financial benefits to him and his family and to his friends.” Criminal cases can indeed be built on a “stream of benefits” running to the politician in question, his family, or his friends.

That is also true of past impeachments. I served as lead counsel in the last judicial impeachment tried before the Senate. My client, Judge G. Thomas Porteous, had been impeached by the House for, among other things, benefits received by his children, including gifts related to a wedding.

One of the jurors in the trial was Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), who voted to convict and remove Porteous. Menendez is now charged with accepting gifts of vastly greater value in the recent corruption indictment.

The similarities between the Menendez and Biden controversies are noteworthy, in everything from the types of gifts to the counsel representing the accused.  The Menendez indictment includes conspiracy charges for honest services fraud, the use of office to serve personal rather the public interests. It also includes extortion under color of official right under 18 U.S.C. 1951. (The Hobbs Act allows for a charge of extortion without a threat of violence but rather the use of official authority.)

Courts have held that conspiracy charges do not require the defendant to be involved in all (or even most) aspects of the planning for a bribe or denial of honest services. Thus, a conspirator does not have to participate “in every overt act or know all the details to be charged as a member of the conspiracy.”

Menendez’s case shows that the Biden Administration is prosecuting individuals under the same type of public corruption that this impeachment inquiry is supposed to prove. The U.S. has long declared influence peddling to be a form of public corruption and signed international conventions to combat precisely this type of corruption around the world.

This impeachment inquiry is going forward. The House just issued subpoenas on Friday for the financial records of both Hunter and James Biden. The public could soon have answers to some of these questions. Madison called impeachment “indispensable…for defending the community” against such corruption. The inquiry itself is an assurance that, wherever this evidence may lead, the House can now follow.

Tyler Durden Mon, 10/02/2023 - 15:00

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending