Connect with us

Uncategorized

Delivering RNA Therapeutics through Silicon Stabilized Hybrid Lipid Nanoparticles

SiSaf’s novel Bio-Courier delivery system that combines inorganic silicon and organic lipid vesicles offers a solution for the current shortcomings of…

Published

on

Recent advances in biotechnology and genetic engineering have produced new therapeutics and treatment modalities for many diseases and created an emphasis on effectively delivering novel drugs to their target destinations. RNA-based therapeutics are poised to revolutionize treatment options for a variety of genetic diseases that had until recently been untreatable. However, delivering fragile therapeutic RNA to cellular and subcellular targets remains daunting.

The various delivery vehicles for RNA therapeutics can be broadly categorized into viral and nonviral systems. Viral delivery is currently the most popular and sophisticated method for the delivery of gene therapies. On the other hand, nonviral delivery systems include liposome, niosome,1 and lipid nanoparticles2 (LNPs).

Concerns exist regarding the safety of viral delivery systems although AAV delivery is widely used and considered the safest of viral vehicles. Immunogenicity is a major concern for AAV delivery. Even if immunogenicity is avoided in single administrations of the treatment, repeated administrations increase the risk of aberrantly triggering the immune system. However, the main challenge with AAV delivery is the stability of the RNA payload.

“Lipid nanoparticles are the main players in nonviral technologies for RNA therapeutics. They did a great job for RNA vaccines,” says Suzanne Saffie-Siebert, PhD, CEO of SiSaf, an RNA delivery and therapeutics company. “However, AAV capsids consist of a protein shell which isn’t robust enough during in vivo applications as it is prone to enzymatic degradation. As a result, AAV capsids are highly susceptible to rupture, releasing the payload before reaching their target.”

Although LNPs can be formulated to encapsulate high payloads, instability of the lipid bilayer in LNPs can cause them to rupture during storage or in vivo upon interactions with serum proteins, and prematurely release their cargo.

Stability and storage

Delivery issues with LNPs arise when moving beyond RNA vaccines into the growing field of RNA therapeutics that require specific targeting approaches and enhanced durability.

“Beyond vaccines, you need a delivery system that offers proper targeting and is able to stay in the system long enough to reach the selected cells,” says Saffie-Siebert. “Stability is the main problem with LNPs, which results in follow-up problems.”

When the delivery system is not stable enough to hold its therapeutic RNA cargo till it reaches the target in sufficient abundance, one must either increase the dosage or administer the treatment repeatedly, which reduces safety and increases cost. Repeated injections create immunogenicity issues for LNPs, particularly pegylated lipid compositions, as they do for viral particles.

Moreover, the use of ultra-cold -80°C or -20°C freezers to store RNA-containing LNPs is perhaps not a huge challenge for western countries, but it is not feasible for financially challenged parts of the world.

“You cannot have a global product that requires ultra-cold storage. Even for RNA vaccines, it is a challenge,” says Saffie-Siebert. “If RNA therapeutics are to become the next revolution in medicine, you need better and more sophisticated delivery systems.”

A hybrid solution

Silicon increases the stability of the hybrid delivery system compared to LNP, thereby enhancing the durability of the drug in circulation. [Suzanne Saffie-Siebert]
When Saffie-Siebert graduated from the University of London in 1998, she had been working on plasmid-based DNA gene therapy delivered by lipid particles. RNA had not yet taken center stage in therapeutics. DNA was the frontier for gene therapy.

“Even then we knew lipid delivery was limited. But I stayed in the field of organic materials, lipids and polymers, until 2000. Then I expanded into inorganic materials including silicon. The SiSaf RNA delivery technology is a combination of my academic and industrial experience,” says Saffie-Siebert. “The hybrid inorganic silicon and organic lipid vesicle is the solution for the current shortcomings of LNPs.”

The enhanced stability of the hybrid system compared to LNP increases the durability of the drug in circulation. This enables the drug to reach endosomal compartments and stay long enough to knock down genes of interest for a therapeutic effect. SiSaf’s silicon-stabilized hybrid lipid nanoparticles (sshLNP) are effective for extended periods compared to LNPs, enabling easy transport worldwide.

“We have a series of data that shows no reduction of effect of the RNA drug in the hybrid delivery system after two weeks at 37°C. RNA is still intact. It performs as well as the fresh product,” says Saffie-Siebert.

Moreover, the sshLNP technology, which the company calls Bio-Courier, does not use any immunogenic material. “Silicon is safe to use and lipid has no immunogenicity.” The technology does not use cholesterol, and only small quantities of pegylated lipids are used if needed. Both in vitro and in vivo data shows the complete lack of any immunogenic or toxic effect due to the delivery technology in any cell line tested by SiSaf thus far.

Saffie-Siebert said, “Although the Bio-Courier carrier system is an innovative new arrival, we believe it is safe and shows promise.”

Underlying chemistry

The silicon-lipid hybrid system includes silicon inside, outside, and in between the lipid bilayer.

“We call it an intel-inside-intel-outside system. Silicon binds and holds everywhere when it sees lipid particles. The layer of silicon inside and outside the lipid bilayer controls the motion of lipid molecules in the lipid bilayer,” says Saffie-Siebert.

Organic vesicles such as LNPs face a fundamental problem: they rupture. The silicon scaffold matrix lends stability to the vesicles. The hybrid system combines the best of both worlds—the safety of the organic world and the stability of the inorganic world.

Silicon controls the release of the cargo. Once silicon starts dissociating from the system in solution, RNA is released.

“Instead of fusion, you’re now talking about solution. Through controlled release, the system offers better protection,” explains Saffie-Siebert.

Unlike a water-filled balloon that spills its contents easily, silicon can be likened to a net over the balloon and a scaffold within, providing control over the eventual release of the contents.

“Sisaf’s Bio-Courier addresses the issues of LNPs by stabilization via silicon nanoparticles (SiNPs) that occupy the aqueous core and lipid bilayer via an array of noncovalent interactions and, in turn, stabilize the lipid bilayer. Bio-Courier can sustain serum protein interaction without rupturing. This significantly minimizes drug release, offering high RNA payloads,” says Saffie-Siebert.

Accoutrements of assembly

RNA therapeutics that are being currently developed for delivery through LNPs involve the introduction of RNA into the lipid particles during the vesicle production process. This approach poses two problems. First, when RNA is introduced into the LNPs during the production process, it is susceptible to degradation. Secondly, RNA encapsulated in LNPs must be transported under specific storage conditions that may include ultracold temperatures.

“The beauty of Bio-Courier is that we do not introduce the RNA into the hybrid particles during the manufacturing process of the delivery system,” says Saffie-Siebert. “The vesicles are made as empty carriers. The RNA is introduced once the carriers are fully formed. That’s a massive advantage.”

The benefit of this approach is obvious: one can send the empty carrier to destinations worldwide without any storage temperature restrictions. Once the RNA cargo and the hybrid delivery system reach their destination, they are combined through a simple assembly process.

“Because the hybrid delivery vesicles generate a massive electrostatic shield and RNA is negatively charged, when you mix the two oppositely charged particles, RNA condenses and is included in the vesicles,” says Saffie-Siebert. “It’s a straightforward process and does not require any external pharmaceutical instrument or process.”

Applications

Drug delivery to the eye is a challenge. Using live imaging, Saffie-Siebert’s team has demonstrated the uptake of fluorescent siRNA by corneal epithelial cells in vitro and in animal models, using the novel delivery system.3 Sisaf has now partnered with Avellino to use its technology for the development of an siRNA-based local treatment for corneal dystrophy (SIS-201-CD).

“For the first time, we’re able to use eyedrops instead of injections into the eye to administer the RNA therapeutic,” says Saffie-Siebert.

Sisaf’s novel technology is also being used to develop an siRNA-based treatment for osteopetrosis—a rare pediatric bone disease with no available treatment. The therapeutic (SIS-101-ADO) that suppresses the expression of CLCN7 is administered systemically. Animal model studies conducted thus far show a clear achievement of the primary endpoint of the disease, which involves clearing of debris in the bone tissue. The project is currently at the stage of IND application.

“We did head-to-head comparisons between LNP and Bio-Courier delivery and show Bio-Courier makes or breaks the osteopetrosis siRNA therapeutic effect,” says Saffie-Siebert.

Sisaf’s Bio-Courier carrier system has been approved by MHRA, the U.K.’s equivalent of the FDA, and the company is gearing up for FDA approval. Saffie-Siebert strongly believes the future is all about precision medicine and tailor-made delivery systems. She speculates that the Bio-Courier system will refine progressively through several generations, replacing the pioneering success of LNPs for the delivery of RNA therapeutics. Over the next decade, Saffie-Siebert expects to see the company’s new delivery system being used to deliver drugs for specific diseases to target organs, including the brain.

References

  1. Kazi KM, Mandal AS, Biswas N, Guha A, Chatterjee S, Behera M, Kuotsu K. Niosome: A future of targeted drug delivery systems. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2010 Oct;1(4):374-80. doi: 10.4103/0110-5558.76435. PMID: 22247876; PMCID: PMC3255404.
  2. Labouta HI, Langer R, Cullis PR, Merkel OM, Prausnitz MR, Gomaa Y, Nogueira SS, Kumeria T. Role of drug delivery technologies in the success of COVID-19 vaccines: a perspective. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2022 Nov;12(11):2581-2588. doi: 10.1007/s13346-022-01146-1. Epub 2022 Mar 15. PMID: 35290656; PMCID: PMC8923087.
  3. Baran-Rachwalska P, Saffie-Siebert S, Moore CBT. Delivery of siRNA to the Eye: Protocol for a Feasibility Study to Assess Novel Delivery System for Topical Delivery of siRNA Therapeutics to the Ocular Surface. Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2282:443-453. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1298-9_24. PMID: 33928589.

The post Delivering RNA Therapeutics through Silicon Stabilized Hybrid Lipid Nanoparticles appeared first on GEN - Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News.

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Aging at AACR Annual Meeting 2024

BUFFALO, NY- March 11, 2024 – Impact Journals publishes scholarly journals in the biomedical sciences with a focus on all areas of cancer and aging…

Published

on

BUFFALO, NY- March 11, 2024 – Impact Journals publishes scholarly journals in the biomedical sciences with a focus on all areas of cancer and aging research. Aging is one of the most prominent journals published by Impact Journals

Credit: Impact Journals

BUFFALO, NY- March 11, 2024 – Impact Journals publishes scholarly journals in the biomedical sciences with a focus on all areas of cancer and aging research. Aging is one of the most prominent journals published by Impact Journals

Impact Journals will be participating as an exhibitor at the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Annual Meeting 2024 from April 5-10 at the San Diego Convention Center in San Diego, California. This year, the AACR meeting theme is “Inspiring Science • Fueling Progress • Revolutionizing Care.”

Visit booth #4159 at the AACR Annual Meeting 2024 to connect with members of the Aging team.

About Aging-US:

Aging publishes research papers in all fields of aging research including but not limited, aging from yeast to mammals, cellular senescence, age-related diseases such as cancer and Alzheimer’s diseases and their prevention and treatment, anti-aging strategies and drug development and especially the role of signal transduction pathways such as mTOR in aging and potential approaches to modulate these signaling pathways to extend lifespan. The journal aims to promote treatment of age-related diseases by slowing down aging, validation of anti-aging drugs by treating age-related diseases, prevention of cancer by inhibiting aging. Cancer and COVID-19 are age-related diseases.

Aging is indexed and archived by PubMed/Medline (abbreviated as “Aging (Albany NY)”), PubMed CentralWeb of Science: Science Citation Index Expanded (abbreviated as “Aging‐US” and listed in the Cell Biology and Geriatrics & Gerontology categories), Scopus (abbreviated as “Aging” and listed in the Cell Biology and Aging categories), Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS Previews, EMBASE, META (Chan Zuckerberg Initiative) (2018-2022), and Dimensions (Digital Science).

Please visit our website at www.Aging-US.com​​ and connect with us:

  • Aging X
  • Aging Facebook
  • Aging Instagram
  • Aging YouTube
  • Aging LinkedIn
  • Aging SoundCloud
  • Aging Pinterest
  • Aging Reddit

Click here to subscribe to Aging publication updates.

For media inquiries, please contact media@impactjournals.com.


Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

NY Fed Finds Medium, Long-Term Inflation Expectations Jump Amid Surge In Stock Market Optimism

NY Fed Finds Medium, Long-Term Inflation Expectations Jump Amid Surge In Stock Market Optimism

One month after the inflation outlook tracked…

Published

on

NY Fed Finds Medium, Long-Term Inflation Expectations Jump Amid Surge In Stock Market Optimism

One month after the inflation outlook tracked by the NY Fed Consumer Survey extended their late 2023 slide, with 3Y inflation expectations in January sliding to a record low 2.4% (from 2.6% in December), even as 1 and 5Y inflation forecasts remained flat, moments ago the NY Fed reported that in February there was a sharp rebound in longer-term inflation expectations, rising to 2.7% from 2.4% at the three-year ahead horizon, and jumping to 2.9% from 2.5% at the five-year ahead horizon, while the 1Y inflation outlook was flat for the 3rd month in a row, stuck at 3.0%. 

The increases in both the three-year ahead and five-year ahead measures were most pronounced for respondents with at most high school degrees (in other words, the "really smart folks" are expecting deflation soon). The survey’s measure of disagreement across respondents (the difference between the 75th and 25th percentile of inflation expectations) decreased at all horizons, while the median inflation uncertainty—or the uncertainty expressed regarding future inflation outcomes—declined at the one- and three-year ahead horizons and remained unchanged at the five-year ahead horizon.

Going down the survey, we find that the median year-ahead expected price changes increased by 0.1 percentage point to 4.3% for gas; decreased by 1.8 percentage points to 6.8% for the cost of medical care (its lowest reading since September 2020); decreased by 0.1 percentage point to 5.8% for the cost of a college education; and surprisingly decreased by 0.3 percentage point for rent to 6.1% (its lowest reading since December 2020), and remained flat for food at 4.9%.

We find the rent expectations surprising because it is happening just asking rents are rising across the country.

At the same time as consumers erroneously saw sharply lower rents, median home price growth expectations remained unchanged for the fifth consecutive month at 3.0%.

Turning to the labor market, the survey found that the average perceived likelihood of voluntary and involuntary job separations increased, while the perceived likelihood of finding a job (in the event of a job loss) declined. "The mean probability of leaving one’s job voluntarily in the next 12 months also increased, by 1.8 percentage points to 19.5%."

Mean unemployment expectations - or the mean probability that the U.S. unemployment rate will be higher one year from now - decreased by 1.1 percentage points to 36.1%, the lowest reading since February 2022. Additionally, the median one-year-ahead expected earnings growth was unchanged at 2.8%, remaining slightly below its 12-month trailing average of 2.9%.

Turning to household finance, we find the following:

  • The median expected growth in household income remained unchanged at 3.1%. The series has been moving within a narrow range of 2.9% to 3.3% since January 2023, and remains above the February 2020 pre-pandemic level of 2.7%.
  • Median household spending growth expectations increased by 0.2 percentage point to 5.2%. The increase was driven by respondents with a high school degree or less.
  • Median year-ahead expected growth in government debt increased to 9.3% from 8.9%.
  • The mean perceived probability that the average interest rate on saving accounts will be higher in 12 months increased by 0.6 percentage point to 26.1%, remaining below its 12-month trailing average of 30%.
  • Perceptions about households’ current financial situations deteriorated somewhat with fewer respondents reporting being better off than a year ago. Year-ahead expectations also deteriorated marginally with a smaller share of respondents expecting to be better off and a slightly larger share of respondents expecting to be worse off a year from now.
  • The mean perceived probability that U.S. stock prices will be higher 12 months from now increased by 1.4 percentage point to 38.9%.
  • At the same time, perceptions and expectations about credit access turned less optimistic: "Perceptions of credit access compared to a year ago deteriorated with a larger share of respondents reporting tighter conditions and a smaller share reporting looser conditions compared to a year ago."

Also, a smaller percentage of consumers, 11.45% vs 12.14% in prior month, expect to not be able to make minimum debt payment over the next three months

Last, and perhaps most humorous, is the now traditional cognitive dissonance one observes with these polls, because at a time when long-term inflation expectations jumped, which clearly suggests that financial conditions will need to be tightened, the number of respondents expecting higher stock prices one year from today jumped to the highest since November 2021... which incidentally is just when the market topped out during the last cycle before suffering a painful bear market.

Tyler Durden Mon, 03/11/2024 - 12:40

Read More

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Homes listed for sale in early June sell for $7,700 more

New Zillow research suggests the spring home shopping season may see a second wave this summer if mortgage rates fall
The post Homes listed for sale in…

Published

on

  • A Zillow analysis of 2023 home sales finds homes listed in the first two weeks of June sold for 2.3% more. 
  • The best time to list a home for sale is a month later than it was in 2019, likely driven by mortgage rates.
  • The best time to list can be as early as the second half of February in San Francisco, and as late as the first half of July in New York and Philadelphia. 

Spring home sellers looking to maximize their sale price may want to wait it out and list their home for sale in the first half of June. A new Zillow® analysis of 2023 sales found that homes listed in the first two weeks of June sold for 2.3% more, a $7,700 boost on a typical U.S. home.  

The best time to list consistently had been early May in the years leading up to the pandemic. The shift to June suggests mortgage rates are strongly influencing demand on top of the usual seasonality that brings buyers to the market in the spring. This home-shopping season is poised to follow a similar pattern as that in 2023, with the potential for a second wave if the Federal Reserve lowers interest rates midyear or later. 

The 2.3% sale price premium registered last June followed the first spring in more than 15 years with mortgage rates over 6% on a 30-year fixed-rate loan. The high rates put home buyers on the back foot, and as rates continued upward through May, they were still reassessing and less likely to bid boldly. In June, however, rates pulled back a little from 6.79% to 6.67%, which likely presented an opportunity for determined buyers heading into summer. More buyers understood their market position and could afford to transact, boosting competition and sale prices.

The old logic was that sellers could earn a premium by listing in late spring, when search activity hit its peak. Now, with persistently low inventory, mortgage rate fluctuations make their own seasonality. First-time home buyers who are on the edge of qualifying for a home loan may dip in and out of the market, depending on what’s happening with rates. It is almost certain the Federal Reserve will push back any interest-rate cuts to mid-2024 at the earliest. If mortgage rates follow, that could bring another surge of buyers later this year.

Mortgage rates have been impacting affordability and sale prices since they began rising rapidly two years ago. In 2022, sellers nationwide saw the highest sale premium when they listed their home in late March, right before rates barreled past 5% and continued climbing. 

Zillow’s research finds the best time to list can vary widely by metropolitan area. In 2023, it was as early as the second half of February in San Francisco, and as late as the first half of July in New York. Thirty of the top 35 largest metro areas saw for-sale listings command the highest sale prices between May and early July last year. 

Zillow also found a wide range in the sale price premiums associated with homes listed during those peak periods. At the hottest time of the year in San Jose, homes sold for 5.5% more, a $88,000 boost on a typical home. Meanwhile, homes in San Antonio sold for 1.9% more during that same time period.  

 

Metropolitan Area Best Time to List Price Premium Dollar Boost
United States First half of June 2.3% $7,700
New York, NY First half of July 2.4% $15,500
Los Angeles, CA First half of May 4.1% $39,300
Chicago, IL First half of June 2.8% $8,800
Dallas, TX First half of June 2.5% $9,200
Houston, TX Second half of April 2.0% $6,200
Washington, DC Second half of June 2.2% $12,700
Philadelphia, PA First half of July 2.4% $8,200
Miami, FL First half of June 2.3% $12,900
Atlanta, GA Second half of June 2.3% $8,700
Boston, MA Second half of May 3.5% $23,600
Phoenix, AZ First half of June 3.2% $14,700
San Francisco, CA Second half of February 4.2% $50,300
Riverside, CA First half of May 2.7% $15,600
Detroit, MI First half of July 3.3% $7,900
Seattle, WA First half of June 4.3% $31,500
Minneapolis, MN Second half of May 3.7% $13,400
San Diego, CA Second half of April 3.1% $29,600
Tampa, FL Second half of June 2.1% $8,000
Denver, CO Second half of May 2.9% $16,900
Baltimore, MD First half of July 2.2% $8,200
St. Louis, MO First half of June 2.9% $7,000
Orlando, FL First half of June 2.2% $8,700
Charlotte, NC Second half of May 3.0% $11,000
San Antonio, TX First half of June 1.9% $5,400
Portland, OR Second half of April 2.6% $14,300
Sacramento, CA First half of June 3.2% $17,900
Pittsburgh, PA Second half of June 2.3% $4,700
Cincinnati, OH Second half of April 2.7% $7,500
Austin, TX Second half of May 2.8% $12,600
Las Vegas, NV First half of June 3.4% $14,600
Kansas City, MO Second half of May 2.5% $7,300
Columbus, OH Second half of June 3.3% $10,400
Indianapolis, IN First half of July 3.0% $8,100
Cleveland, OH First half of July  3.4% $7,400
San Jose, CA First half of June 5.5% $88,400

 

The post Homes listed for sale in early June sell for $7,700 more appeared first on Zillow Research.

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending