Uncategorized
Cities Where the Most Home Sellers Are Giving Up
Sellers aren’t getting the price they want, or they’re not getting offers at all. These are the cities where the most active listings were delisted.

Sellers aren't getting the price they want, or they're not getting offers at all. These are the cities where the most active listings were delisted.
When it comes to homeownership, nothing is easy. Whether you own one or want to buy one or sell one, it’s no cakewalk.
Hopeful home buyers are wrangling with higher interest rates, low inventory, and steep prices. During the pandemic, competition was fierce, with bidding wars and homes selling overnight.
But while buyers still face the challenges of unaffordability, sellers are now facing their own woes. Bidding wars and record-fast sales are gone: A recent analysis by Zillow (ZG) - Get Free Report finds that homes are now lingering on the market for a median of 54 days--45% longer than last year.
Even in high-price, high-demand San Francisco, a record share of home listings were taken off the market in November, CBS reports, and sellers are seeing offers drop as interest rates drag down the market.
In fact, Lawrence Yun, chief economist at the National Association of Realtors, predicts that prices in San Francisco are likely to register drops of 10–15% in 2023.
Yun predicts that 4.78 million existing homes will be sold in 2023 in the U.S., a decline of 6.8% compared to 2022 when 5.13 million home were sold.
Sellers are giving up, at least for now. A record 2% of U.S. homes for sale were delisted each week on average during the 12 weeks ending Nov. 20, compared with 1.6% one year earlier, according to an analysis by online real estate brokerage Redfin.
Sellers are taking their homes off the market because they’re not getting the price they want, or not getting offers at all. Redfin says that’s due to a sharp drop in homebuyer demand driven by rising mortgage rates and persistently high home prices.
The early days of summer are considered peak real estate season in most of the U.S., according to Rocket Mortgage, and November is a normal time for the market to slow down when there are fewer buyers. Redfin’s data shows that it’s normal for the number of delistings--listings that go from active to off-market without being sold--to peak before Thanksgiving.
And while the pace of delistings came down a touch between Nov. 20 and Nov. 27, declining to 1.9%, it’s still more than any year since 2015, Redfin’s data shows.
The cities with the most delistings are those that were real estate boomtowns in the pandemic--markets that saw home prices skyrocket as remote workers and people seeking more space fled crowded cities. Now, with many buyers priced out, these markets are among the fastest cooling in the country, Redfin says.
Sacramento, Calif., tops the list, with 3.6% of active listings delisted per week on average during the 12 weeks ending Nov. 27, up 1.6 percentage points from a year earlier--the largest increase among the metros Redfin analyzed.
Based on Redfin’s analysis of MLS data across 43 of the 50 most populous U.S. metropolitan areas (those with sufficient data) these are the homes with the most delistings during the 12 weeks ending Nov. 27, 2022.
1. Sacramento, Calif.
- Share of active listings delisted: 3.6%
- Year-over-year change: +1.6 percentage points

2. San Francisco
- Share of active listings delisted: 3.4%
- Year-over-year change: +1.1 percentage points

3. Oakland, Calif.
- Share of active listings delisted: 3.3%
- Year-over-year change: +1.0 percentage points

4. Seattle
- Share of active listings delisted: 3.2%
- Year-over-year change: +1.4 percentage points

5. San Jose, Calif.
- Share of active listings delisted: 3.0%
- Year-over-year change: +0.9 percentage points

6. Boston
- Share of active listings delisted: 2.9%
- Year-over-year change: +0.2 percentage points

7. San Diego
- Share of active listings delisted: 2.9%
- Year-over-year change: +1.2 percentage points

8. Denver
- Share of active listings delisted: 2.7%
- Year-over-year change: +1.2 percentage points

9. Los Angeles
- Share of active listings delisted: 2.7%
- Year-over-year change: +0.8 percentage points
Shutterstock

10. Philadelphia
- Share of active listings delisted: 2.7%
- Year-over-year change: +0.6 percentage points

11. Detroit
- Share of active listings delisted: 2.6%
- Year-over-year change: -0.1 percentage points
Detroit was one of six metros that saw a decrease in the share of delistings from a year earlier.

12. Providence, R.I.
- Share of active listings delisted: 2.6%
- Year-over-year change: +0.5 percentage points
Shutterstock

13. Anaheim, Calif.
- Share of active listings delisted: 2.5%
- Year-over-year change: +1.1 percentage points

14. Indianapolis
- Share of active listings delisted: 2.5%
- Year-over-year change: +1.0 percentage points
Shutterstock

15. Portland, Ore.
- Share of active listings delisted: 2.5%
- Year-over-year change: +1.1 percentage points

16. Austin, Texas
- Share of active listings delisted: 2.4%
- Year-over-year change: +1.5 percentage points

17. Las Vegas
- Share of active listings delisted: 2.4%
- Year-over-year change: +0.9 percentage points

18. Phoenix
- Share of active listings delisted: 2.4%
- Year-over-year change: +1.3 percentage points
Shutterstock

19. Washington, D.C.
- Share of active listings delisted: 2.4%
- Year-over-year change: +0.5 percentage points

20. Nashville, Tenn.
- Share of active listings delisted: 2.3%
- Year-over-year change: +0.8 percentage points
Shutterstock

21. New York
- Share of active listings delisted: 2.3%
- Year-over-year change: +0.4 percentage points
Andrew F. Kazmierski / Shutterstock

22. Warren, Mich.
- Share of active listings delisted: 2.3%
- Year-over-year change: -0.5 percentage points
Warren was one of six metros that saw a decrease in the share of delistings from a year earlier.

23. Baltimore
- Share of active listings delisted: 2.2%
- Year-over-year change: +0.3 percentage points
Shutterstock

24. Cleveland
- Share of active listings delisted: 2.2%
- Year-over-year change: +0.4 percentage points

25. Houston
- Share of active listings delisted: 2.1%
- Year-over-year change: +0.5 percentage points

26. Nassau County, N.Y.
- Share of active listings delisted: 2.1%
- Year-over-year change: +0.2 percentage points

27. Riverside, Calif.
- Share of active listings delisted: 2.1%
- Year-over-year change: +0.5 percentage points
Shutterstock

28. Minneapolis
- Share of active listings delisted: 2.0%
- Year-over-year change: +0.4 percentage points
Shutterstock

29. Orlando
- Share of active listings delisted: 2.0%
- Year-over-year change: +0.4 percentage points
Shutterstock

30. Chicago
- Share of active listings delisted: 1.9%
- Year-over-year change: -0.5 percentage points
Chicago was one of six metros, along with Detroit, that saw a decrease in the share of delistings from a year earlier. Other metros that saw a decrease were: Newark, N.J., New Brunswick, N.J., and Montgomery County, Pa.
Cities with the fewest delistings were Pittsburgh and Cincinnati, at 1.3% and 1.4%, respectively, although for both cities, that was a slight increase compared with a year earlier.
Uncategorized
Australian Banking Association’s cost of living inquiry reveals bank pressure
An analysis of the rising inflation and concurrent collapse of Silicon Valley Bank proved that more than 186 banks in the U.S. are at risk of a similar…

An analysis of the rising inflation and concurrent collapse of Silicon Valley Bank proved that more than 186 banks in the U.S. are at risk of a similar shutdown if depositors decide to withdraw all funds.
The trade association for the Australian banking industry — the Australian Banking Association (ABA) — launched a cost of living inquiry to closely study the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, global supply chain constraints, geopolitical tensions and more on Australians.
An analysis of the rising inflation and concurrent collapse of three major traditional banks — Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), Silvergate Bank and Signature Bank — recently proved that more than 186 banks in the U.S. are at risk of a similar shutdown if depositors decide to withdraw all funds. The ABA’s inquiry aims to identify ways to ease the cost of living in Australia and the Government’s fiscal policy response.

ABA acknowledged that many Australians would struggle to adjust to a higher cost of living, while it may be easier for some, adding that:
“The ABA notes most customers will manage the higher cost of living and their mortgage commitments by changing their spending patterns, applying their accumulated savings to their higher repayments in anticipation of higher borrowing rates, or refinancing their mortgage.”
One of the most significant pressures for banks was when citizens rolled over from a fixed-rate mortgage to a variable rate. However, ABA urged customers to be proactive and ensure they are getting the best deal for their banking services.

Property rent across Australia has also witnessed a steady increase as markets normalized following the end of COVID-19 restrictions. Citizens experiencing financial difficulty can contact their banks and get help, including fees and charges waivers, emergency credit limit increases and deferral of scheduled loan repayments, to name a few.
Related: National Australia Bank makes first-ever cross-border stablecoin transaction
Alongside this attempt to cushion Australians against rising fiat inflation, the Reserve Bank of Australia and the Department of the Treasury have been holding private meetings with executives from Coinbase, with discussions revolving around the future of crypto regulation in Australia.
Consultation open! Today we released the token mapping consultation paper. This consultation is part of a multi step reform agenda to develop an appropriate regulatory setting for the #crypto sector. Read paper & submit views @ https://t.co/4W2msjhP9B @ASIC_Connect @AUSTRAC pic.twitter.com/OGHuZEGvDp
— Australian Treasury (@Treasury_AU) February 2, 2023
Cointelegraph confirmed from an RBA spokesperson that Coinbase met with the RBA’s payments policy and financial stability departments in mid-March “as part of the Bank’s ongoing liaison with industry.”
crypto pandemic covid-19 cryptoUncategorized
Fed, central banks enhance ‘swap lines’ to combat banking crisis
Currency swap lines have been used during times of crisis in the past, such as the 2008 global financial crisis and the 2020 coronavirus pandemic.
…

Currency swap lines have been used during times of crisis in the past, such as the 2008 global financial crisis and the 2020 coronavirus pandemic.
The United States Federal Reserve has announced a coordinated effort with five other central banks aimed at keeping the U.S. dollar flowing amid a series of banking blowups in the U.S. and in Europe.
The March 19 announcement from the U.S. Fed comes only a few hours after Swiss-based bank Credit Suisse was bought out by UBS for nearly $2 billion as part of an emergency plan led by Swiss authorities to preserve the country's financial stability.
According to the Federal Reserve Board, a plan to shore up liquidity conditions will be carried out through “swap lines” — an agreement between two central banks to exchange currencies.
Swap lines previously served as an emergency-like action for the Federal Reserve in the 2007-2008 global financial crisis and the 2020 response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Federal Reserve-initiated swap lines are designed to improve liquidity in dollar funding markets during tough economic conditions.
Coordinated central bank action to enhance the provision of U.S. dollar liquidity: https://t.co/Qs4cYY8BFO
— Federal Reserve (@federalreserve) March 19, 2023
"To improve the swap lines’ effectiveness in providing U.S. dollar funding, the central banks currently offering U.S. dollar operations have agreed to increase the frequency of seven-day maturity operations from weekly to daily," the Fed said in a statement.
The swap line network will include the Bank of Canada, Bank of England, Bank of Japan, European Central Bank and the Swiss National Bank. It will start on March 20 and continue at least until April 30.
The move also comes amid a negative outlook for the U.S. banking system, with Silvergate Bank and Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) collapsing and the New York District of Financial Services (NYDFS) takeover of Signature Bank.
The Federal Reserve however made no direct reference to the recent banking crisis in its statement. Instead, it explained that they implemented the swap line agreement to strengthen the supply of credit to households and businesses:
“The network of swap lines among these central banks is a set of available standing facilities and serve as an important liquidity backstop to ease strains in global funding markets, thereby helping to mitigate the effects of such strains on the supply of credit to households and businesses.”
The latest announcement from the Fed has sparked a debate about whether the arrangement constitutes quantitative easing.
U.S. economist Danielle DiMartino Booth argued however that the arrangements are unrelated to quantitative easing or inflation and that it does not "loosen" financial conditions:
MISINFORMATION PREVENTION MOMENT
— Danielle DiMartino Booth (@DiMartinoBooth) March 19, 2023
Swap lines do NOT constitute loosening financial conditions.
One more example: You're a doctor. A patient is having cardiac arrest. You can SEE the paddles to revive him/her but you can't REACH the paddles. These swap lines HAND you the paddles. https://t.co/RXOPiBmsif
The Federal Reserve has been working to prevent an escalation of the banking crisis.
Related: Banking crisis: What does it mean for crypto?
Last week, the Federal Reserve set up a $25 billion funding program to ensure banks have sufficient liquidity to cover customer needs amid tough market conditions.
A recent analysis by several economists on the SVB collapse found that up to 186 U.S. banks are at risk of insolvency:
“Even if only half of uninsured depositors decide to withdraw, almost 190 banks are at a potential risk of impairment to insured depositors, with potentially $300 billion of insured deposits at risk.”
Cointelegraph reached out to the Federal Reserve for comment but did not receive an immediate response.
currencies pandemic coronavirus covid-19 cryptoUncategorized
MGM Shares Surprising Las Vegas Strip News
Two of the resort casino operator’s executives spoke at a recent event where they talked about Las Vegas’s covid comeback.

Two of the resort casino operator's executives spoke at a recent event where they talked about Las Vegas's covid comeback.
The Las Vegas Strip suffered during the covid pandemic when lights on the iconic 4.2-mile stretch of road literally went dark due to a government-mandated closure. Recovery, however, has been not exactly a straight line because the lingering impact of the pandemic has been a drag on some key business areas.
The two biggest players on the Strip -- Caesars Entertainment (CZR) - Get Free Report and MGM Resorts International (MGM) - Get Free Report -- have both had to make decisions without being able to use the past as a guide. In most years, for example, you could make a reasonable guess as to how many people might visit the city during a major convention based on how many attendees that show had the past year.
DON'T MISS: Las Vegas Strip Faces a New Post-Pandemic Reality
Covid, however, changed that equation. Some companies have realized that maybe they don't need to spend the money on exhibiting or attending shows while others may have employees reticent to be in crowded spaces.
In addition, some major events -- like CES in 2022 -- saw attendance plummet at the last minute due to a spike in covid numbers. Add in that international travelers and some more-vulnerable populations have continued to be wary of travel and it makes planning a challenge for Caesars and MGM.
All of this has led to low prices for tourists and business travelers -- especially those who booked far in advance. That has been slowly changing, especially for major non-business tourist events like March Madness, the NFL Draft, and November's Formula 1 race (a weekend where Caesars, MGM, and the other Strip operators may break pricing records).
Rising prices and a rebounding convention business don't mean the end of Las Vegas as a value destination for tourists, according to MGM COO Corey Sanders, who spoke at the recent J.P. Morgan Gaming, Lodging, Restaurant & Leisure Management Access Forum in Las Vegas.
Shutterstock
MGM Expects a Convention Comeback (Just Not Yet)
Although Las Vegas has largely returned to normal after its covid disruptions, room rates at many Caesars and MGM properties remain below historic norms. That's at least partially because the convention business remained soft in 2022 and not having those huge blocks of rooms booked led to the casino operators generally keeping prices low.
That's expected to continue through 2023, according to Sanders, Casino.org reported.
"With regards to convention, in particular with MGM, we’re going to be down a little bit this year. Some of it is strategic. We have made a decision that on weekends, we’ll put less convention business in our buildings,” he shared.
Fewer rooms booked for conventions generally means lower rates across the Strip.
Sanders said he expected 2023 to be a "decent" year for MGM's Strip convention business, but he believes that 2024 and 2025 will be stronger.
MGM Sees the Value of an Affordable Las Vegas
A convention business bounceback, however, does not mean an end to affordable Las Vegas Strip hotel rooms, according to MGM Senior Vice President Sarah Rogers, who joined Sanders onstage. She made it clear that MGM understands that the Las Vegas Strip must maintain its status as an affordable vacation destination.
“We still offer a relative value. That gap has tightened a little bit,” said Rogers. “Some of those drivers that have allowed us to sustain that are things like continued programming, improved product, and the suite offering that we have. So we’re comfortable that we still offer relative value.”
Sanders also pointed out that "much of the increase in traffic at Harry Reid International Airport in Las Vegas is attributable to economy carriers, meaning the travel costs to get to the U.S. casino hub are, broadly speaking, tolerable for a broad swath of customers," Casino.org's Todd Shriber wrote.
ALSO READ:
- How to Get Around in Las Vegas (From Taxis to Your Own Two Feet)
- Why Las Vegas Is Safer Than You Might Think
-
Government11 hours ago
“True Stories… Could Fuel Hesitancy”: Stanford Project Worked To Censor Even True Stories On Social Media
-
Uncategorized7 hours ago
Fed, central banks enhance ‘swap lines’ to combat banking crisis
-
International5 hours ago
What Follows US Hegemony
-
International21 hours ago
The limits of expert judgment: Lessons from social science forecasting during the pandemic
-
Government18 hours ago
Royal Caribbean Officially Makes Controversial Change
-
Government21 hours ago
Is The US Funding An Experiment In Digital Control In Ukraine?
-
Spread & Containment13 hours ago
“The New Normal”: New York To Lower Math And English Proficiency Standards Due To Poor Test Result
-
Uncategorized28 mins ago
Australian Banking Association’s cost of living inquiry reveals bank pressure