Connect with us

International

Building back better means raising wages for public-sector workers

The COVID-19 pandemic presented a massive crisis that demanded a large collective response. At times, strong government action—mask mandates, expanded…

Published

on

Key takeaways

  • Thanks to federal recovery funds, state and local policymakers have substantial additional resources to invest in their communities—and they should invest in raising pay for their own employees.
  • Many of the workers providing public services are paid low wages. Roughly one-third of state and local government workers are paid less than $20 an hour, and more than 15% are paid less than $15 an hour.
  • Black and Latinx employees are especially likely to be paid inadequate wages in the public sector. Investing in public services can promote greater racial equity in pay.

The COVID-19 pandemic presented a massive crisis that demanded a large collective response. At times, strong government action—mask mandates, expanded unemployment insurance, stimulus checks, free vaccines—saved lives and livelihoods. At the same time, past underinvestment in public services exacerbated suffering as hospitals were overwhelmed, unemployment claims processing stalled, and schools struggled to adjust to remote learning. Now, thanks to federal recovery funds administered through the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) in 2021, state and local policymakers have substantial additional resources to invest in their communities, whether that means preparing for the next unexpected disaster or strengthening the services that help individuals and families through their own difficult times.

Investing in these services also means investing in the workers who carry them out, far too many of whom are paid low wages for their valuable work in providing public education, delivering health services and pandemic response, administering programs such as unemployment insurance, keeping our roads and sewers safe, and getting commuters to work. This blog post presents data quantifying and describing these public-sector workers and shows that Black and Latinx employees are especially likely to be paid inadequate wages.

The U.S. Department of the Treasury is encouraging states and localities to use federal recovery funds with equity in mind. To advance this goal, states and localities should invest in improving pay for their own employees who ensure social needs are met, especially lower-paid state and local employees, many of whom are women of color.

Many of the workers providing public services are paid low wages

As shown in Figure A, we estimate that 5.5 million state and local government employees are paid less than $20 an hour, accounting for about a third (32.7%) of the sector. i About 2.6 million of them, or 15.6% of the sector, are paid less than $15 an hour.

While we use $15 and $20 as cutoff points throughout this blog post to describe lower-paid state and local government workers, these should not be seen as the ceiling for policymakers. Raising wages to these levels would just be a start toward ensuring that state and local government workers are able to make ends meet, and that their pay reflects the value of their work to the communities they serve.

Figure A

While there are public-sector workers who are paid inadequately in every state, there are geographic differences because states and localities make disparate investments in social services and the employees who deliver them.

Figure B shows the share and number of state and local government workers in each state whose hourly wages are below $15 and $20. The share of these workers who are paid less than $15 ranges from a low of 8.2% in Massachusetts to a remarkable high of 29.0% in Mississippi. More than one in five state and local government workers are paid less than $15 an hour in 12 additional states: Louisiana (25.5%), Oklahoma (22.8%), New Mexico (22.4%), Arkansas (22.2%), South Dakota (21.5%), Indiana (21.4%), West Virginia (21.4%), Utah (21.1%), Georgia (20.8%), Kentucky (20.6%), Alabama (20.5%), and South Carolina (20.1%). Nine of these states are in the South, where there are both high populations of Black people and predominantly white state lawmakers who refuse to raise labor standards for workers and prevent local governments from raising labor standards on their own.

Figure B
Figure B

Low wages are not limited to a narrow set of occupations in state and local government, although some occupations are more acutely low-wage than others. Figure C presents the shares of selected occupation groups within the state and local government workforce that are paid less than $15 and $20 an hour. Many workers providing critical services, including workers who were deemed “essential” during the start of the pandemic, remain woefully undervalued.

The majority (63.4%) of child care workers and direct care aides (personal care and nursing aides who help older adults and people with disabilities to clean, cook, and stay healthy) employed by state and local governments are paid less than $15 an hour.ii Workers in cleaning and maintenance occupations (including the janitors that keep public schools and health care facilities clean) and workers in transportation occupations (including public transit workers) are also more likely than the typical state and local government worker to be paid less than $15 an hour. About a quarter (25.9%) of office and administrative support workers are paid less than $15 an hour, despite the critical roles they play in facilitating a range of public services, from directly administering government programs to working in schools or health care. Further, most workers in each of these occupations are paid less than $20 an hour.

Among teaching assistants—many of whom faced economic precarity during school closures and now face heightened risk of COVID exposure serving a largely unvaccinated student population—two in five (40.8%) are paid less than $15 an hour, and the vast majority (71.2%) are paid less than $20 per hour. Among other education-related occupations (including librarians and preschool, kindergarten, and special education teachers), 18.6% are paid less than $15 an hour and about one-third are paid less than $20 an hour.

While teachers are less likely to be paid low wages than other state and local government workers, a good number are still subject to low pay, particularly when compared with workers in other professions with similar levels of education and experience. This long-running undervaluing of teachers has fueled staffing shortages in schools that existed long before the COVID-19 pandemic.

Today, one in 10 elementary and middle school teachers are paid less than $15 an hour. Since they make up such large shares of the state and local workforce, they account for a substantial share (11.0%) of those who are paid less than $15 an hour. That any of our country’s public school teachers would be paid so little highlights how desperately public officials need to invest in the teaching workforce, if school districts are to attract and retain highly qualified educators.

Figure C
Figure C

Investing in public services can promote greater racial equity in pay

The public sector has long been an important employer of Black people and women. This is no coincidence. Rather, it is the result of deliberate policy choices that encouraged more equitable hiring practices. Prompted by the civil rights movement, the federal government pioneered equal opportunity and affirmative action practices during the 1960’s and 1970’s. Subsequently, state and local governments were required to adhere to federal equal opportunity provisions, and today, some even go above and beyond to institute additional affirmative action plans. This means that, all else equal, Black workers and women stand to benefit most from raising public-sector wages.

That being said, all else is not, in fact, equal. Even within state and local government, Black workers and women are more concentrated in lower-paid positions—meaning that they stand to gain even more if pay increases in the public sector prioritize lower-paid workers. As shown in Figure D, women make up 60.2% of the state and local government workforce, compared with less than half of the private sector (46.6%). Yet within state and local government, women represent an even greater share (68.7%) of workers who are paid less than $15 an hour.

Figure D
Figure D

Women of color are even more concentrated among the lowest paid staff. Black women make up 8.8% of the overall state and local government workforce, yet they account for 12.7% of workers paid less than $15 an hour. Nearly a quarter of Black women in state and local government (23.2%) are paid below that level, compared with 16.1% of white women. Because they are routinely marginalized in the economy, Black women should be centered, not sidelined, when state and local policymakers make economic policy decisions. This is especially true when policymakers’ decisions directly affect the Black women that keep state and local governments running. Improving economic security for Black women is necessary for dismantling the racism and sexism they face in the labor market, and to creating a more equitable economy and society for all. The public sector should be a model of those efforts.

While Latinx workers overall are underrepresented in state and local government (12.7% compared with 19.0% of the private sector), Latinx women make up a proportionate share of this workforce (7.9% compared with 8.1% of the private sector). However, like their Black colleagues, they are concentrated in lower-paid jobs, with more than one in five (22.1%) Latinx women in the state and local public sector paid less than $15 an hour. As a result, one in 10 (10.9%) state and local government workers paid less than $15 an hour is a Latinx woman.

In addition to pay raises, state and local governments can better promote equity in the workplace by protecting and promoting their employees’ ability to join a union. Coming together with their colleagues is a key source of power that enables workers to advocate for higher and more equitable wages, safer working conditions, and better benefits. Collective bargaining helps reduce pay gaps between public-sector workers and similar workers in the private sector, especially for Black and Latinx workers.

States have the money to strengthen the public sector and improve pay

The pace of recovery from the Great Recession was one of the slowest in recent U.S. economic history. As is the norm for crises, the consequences of this needlessly slow recovery were simultaneously widespread yet unequally felt. Black households, for example, did not recover their pre-recession median income for more than 10 years after the Great Recession started. This was exacerbated by inadequate federal stimulus and by some states consistently adopting harmful austerity policies that, in addition to rolling back services, severely hampered state and local government employment.

The fiscal situation in the current crisis is quite different. States have received ample support from federal legislation, including the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act passed in March 2020 and the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) passed in March 2021. Among other support, ARPA dedicated $350 billion to help states, local, and tribal governments mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic and its economic consequences and $122 billion more in Elementary and Secondary Schools Emergency Relief Funds (ESSER III). The Treasury Department’s final rule for the usage of the $350 billion in funds provides broad latitude and support of states prioritizing an equitable recovery.

In addition to receiving direct aid from the federal government, many states are running sizable surpluses that run counter to the staffing cuts state and local governments had made in anticipation of sizable revenue losses that never transpired. Thus, state and local government officials have ample funds at their disposal to increase pay for public employees, in addition to bolstering funding for critical public services and equity-promoting, people-centered budgets and programs. While these federal funds are a one-time investment, they can and should still be leveraged to implement wage increases that can be sustained in the long run through other revenue streams, especially in states with unexpected surpluses.

Some places are already taking steps to improve pay for their public-sector workers. In Kentucky, for example, Governor Andy Beshear initiated a 10% raise for social workers and family support specialist staff in December 2021 to help attract and retain workers. Some state lawmakers took steps to raise pay for other public-sector occupations, such as teachers or hospital workers. Others, such as Missouri Governor Mike Parsons and the Florida State Senate, proposed raising the wage floor for all state employees to $15 an hour, although the final Missouri budget ultimately left it up to individual departments to decide.

Investments in public services should also reflect equity goals

Investing in better pay for state and local government workers will foster greater racial and gender equity, since many of these workers are women of color. It is also an important mechanism for bolstering the public services that state and local government workers provide. New desks and textbooks are a good use of public funds, but raising wages for school staff is also a direct investment in education. A new fleet of buses is one component of a more accessible and greener transit system, but the workers driving them are also worthy of investment.

At the same time, which public investments to make, like any policy decisions, can never truly be “race neutral.” When weighing which public services to invest in, policymakers should prioritize those that will lift up communities of color, women, immigrants, and other marginalized groups. Additionally, they should be sure to involve those groups in the decision-making process. This is particularly key where state and local spending has been complicit in harm to communities of color, especially Black communities. Federal funds provide a chance for state and local lawmakers to reverse course and build up communities by investing in proven approaches to safety, health, prosperity, and equity and by valuing the public employees who do that work.

i. Unless otherwise noted, our descriptions of the state and local government workers use data from 2019 and 2021 to provide estimates that balance representing our current labor market and the pre-pandemic (and, presumably, post-pandemic) typical state and local government workforce. Values are in 2021 dollars.

ii. The estimates by occupation use 2019 data.

Read More

Continue Reading

International

United Airlines adds new flights to faraway destinations

The airline said that it has been working hard to "find hidden gem destinations."

Published

on

Since countries started opening up after the pandemic in 2021 and 2022, airlines have been seeing demand soar not just for major global cities and popular routes but also for farther-away destinations.

Numerous reports, including a recent TripAdvisor survey of trending destinations, showed that there has been a rise in U.S. traveler interest in Asian countries such as Japan, South Korea and Vietnam as well as growing tourism traction in off-the-beaten-path European countries such as Slovenia, Estonia and Montenegro.

Related: 'No more flying for you': Travel agency sounds alarm over risk of 'carbon passports'

As a result, airlines have been looking at their networks to include more faraway destinations as well as smaller cities that are growing increasingly popular with tourists and may not be served by their competitors.

The Philippines has been popular among tourists in recent years.

Shutterstock

United brings back more routes, says it is committed to 'finding hidden gems'

This week, United Airlines  (UAL)  announced that it will be launching a new route from Newark Liberty International Airport (EWR) to Morocco's Marrakesh. While it is only the country's fourth-largest city, Marrakesh is a particularly popular place for tourists to seek out the sights and experiences that many associate with the country — colorful souks, gardens with ornate architecture and mosques from the Moorish period.

More Travel:

"We have consistently been ahead of the curve in finding hidden gem destinations for our customers to explore and remain committed to providing the most unique slate of travel options for their adventures abroad," United's SVP of Global Network Planning Patrick Quayle, said in a press statement.

The new route will launch on Oct. 24 and take place three times a week on a Boeing 767-300ER  (BA)  plane that is equipped with 46 Polaris business class and 22 Premium Plus seats. The plane choice was a way to reach a luxury customer customer looking to start their holiday in Marrakesh in the plane.

Along with the new Morocco route, United is also launching a flight between Houston (IAH) and Colombia's Medellín on Oct. 27 as well as a route between Tokyo and Cebu in the Philippines on July 31 — the latter is known as a "fifth freedom" flight in which the airline flies to the larger hub from the mainland U.S. and then goes on to smaller Asian city popular with tourists after some travelers get off (and others get on) in Tokyo.

United's network expansion includes new 'fifth freedom' flight

In the fall of 2023, United became the first U.S. airline to fly to the Philippines with a new Manila-San Francisco flight. It has expanded its service to Asia from different U.S. cities earlier last year. Cebu has been on its radar amid growing tourist interest in the region known for marine parks, rainforests and Spanish-style architecture.

With the summer coming up, United also announced that it plans to run its current flights to Hong Kong, Seoul, and Portugal's Porto more frequently at different points of the week and reach four weekly flights between Los Angeles and Shanghai by August 29.

"This is your normal, exciting network planning team back in action," Quayle told travel website The Points Guy of the airline's plans for the new routes.

Read More

Continue Reading

International

Walmart launches clever answer to Target’s new membership program

The retail superstore is adding a new feature to its Walmart+ plan — and customers will be happy.

Published

on

It's just been a few days since Target  (TGT)  launched its new Target Circle 360 paid membership plan. 

The plan offers free and fast shipping on many products to customers, initially for $49 a year and then $99 after the initial promotional signup period. It promises to be a success, since many Target customers are loyal to the brand and will go out of their way to shop at one instead of at its two larger peers, Walmart and Amazon.

Related: Walmart makes a major price cut that will delight customers

And stop us if this sounds familiar: Target will rely on its more than 2,000 stores to act as fulfillment hubs. 

This model is a proven winner; Walmart also uses its more than 4,600 stores as fulfillment and shipping locations to get orders to customers as soon as possible.

Sometimes, this means shipping goods from the nearest warehouse. But if a desired product is in-store and closer to a customer, it reduces miles on the road and delivery time. It's a kind of logistical magic that makes any efficiency lover's (or retail nerd's) heart go pitter patter. 

Walmart rolls out answer to Target's new membership tier

Walmart has certainly had more time than Target to develop and work out the kinks in Walmart+. It first launched the paid membership in 2020 during the height of the pandemic, when many shoppers sheltered at home but still required many staples they might ordinarily pick up at a Walmart, like cleaning supplies, personal-care products, pantry goods and, of course, toilet paper. 

It also undercut Amazon  (AMZN)  Prime, which costs customers $139 a year for free and fast shipping (plus several other benefits including access to its streaming service, Amazon Prime Video). 

Walmart+ costs $98 a year, which also gets you free and speedy delivery, plus access to a Paramount+ streaming subscription, fuel savings, and more. 

An employee at a Merida, Mexico, Walmart. (Photo by Jeffrey Greenberg/Universal Images Group via Getty Images)

Jeff Greenberg/Getty Images

If that's not enough to tempt you, however, Walmart+ just added a new benefit to its membership program, ostensibly to compete directly with something Target now has: ultrafast delivery. 

Target Circle 360 particularly attracts customers with free same-day delivery for select orders over $35 and as little as one-hour delivery on select items. Target executes this through its Shipt subsidiary.

We've seen this lightning-fast delivery speed only in snippets from Amazon, the king of delivery efficiency. Who better to take on Target, though, than Walmart, which is using a similar store-as-fulfillment-center model? 

"Walmart is stepping up to save our customers even more time with our latest delivery offering: Express On-Demand Early Morning Delivery," Walmart said in a statement, just a day after Target Circle 360 launched. "Starting at 6 a.m., earlier than ever before, customers can enjoy the convenience of On-Demand delivery."

Walmart  (WMT)  clearly sees consumers' desire for near-instant delivery, which obviously saves time and trips to the store. Rather than waiting a day for your order to show up, it might be on your doorstep when you wake up. 

Consumers also tend to spend more money when they shop online, and they remain stickier as paying annual members. So, to a growing number of retail giants, almost instant gratification like this seems like something worth striving for.

Related: Veteran fund manager picks favorite stocks for 2024

Read More

Continue Reading

Government

President Biden Delivers The “Darkest, Most Un-American Speech Given By A President”

President Biden Delivers The "Darkest, Most Un-American Speech Given By A President"

Having successfully raged, ranted, lied, and yelled through…

Published

on

President Biden Delivers The "Darkest, Most Un-American Speech Given By A President"

Having successfully raged, ranted, lied, and yelled through the State of The Union, President Biden can go back to his crypt now.

Whatever 'they' gave Biden, every American man, woman, and the other should be allowed to take it - though it seems the cocktail brings out 'dark Brandon'?

Tl;dw: Biden's Speech tonight ...

  • Fund Ukraine.

  • Trump is threat to democracy and America itself.

  • Abortion is good.

  • American Economy is stronger than ever.

  • Inflation wasn't Biden's fault.

  • Illegals are Americans too.

  • Republicans are responsible for the border crisis.

  • Trump is bad.

  • Biden stands with trans-children.

  • J6 was the worst insurrection since the Civil War.

(h/t @TCDMS99)

Tucker Carlson's response sums it all up perfectly:

"that was possibly the darkest, most un-American speech given by an American president. It wasn't a speech, it was a rant..."

Carlson continued: "The true measure of a nation's greatness lies within its capacity to control borders, yet Bid refuses to do it."

"In a fair election, Joe Biden cannot win"

And concluded:

“There was not a meaningful word for the entire duration about the things that actually matter to people who live here.”

Victor Davis Hanson added some excellent color, but this was probably the best line on Biden:

"he doesn't care... he lives in an alternative reality."

*  *  *

Watch SOTU Live here...

*   *   *

Mises' Connor O'Keeffe, warns: "Be on the Lookout for These Lies in Biden's State of the Union Address." 

On Thursday evening, President Joe Biden is set to give his third State of the Union address. The political press has been buzzing with speculation over what the president will say. That speculation, however, is focused more on how Biden will perform, and which issues he will prioritize. Much of the speech is expected to be familiar.

The story Biden will tell about what he has done as president and where the country finds itself as a result will be the same dishonest story he's been telling since at least the summer.

He'll cite government statistics to say the economy is growing, unemployment is low, and inflation is down.

Something that has been frustrating Biden, his team, and his allies in the media is that the American people do not feel as economically well off as the official data says they are. Despite what the White House and establishment-friendly journalists say, the problem lies with the data, not the American people's ability to perceive their own well-being.

As I wrote back in January, the reason for the discrepancy is the lack of distinction made between private economic activity and government spending in the most frequently cited economic indicators. There is an important difference between the two:

  • Government, unlike any other entity in the economy, can simply take money and resources from others to spend on things and hire people. Whether or not the spending brings people value is irrelevant

  • It's the private sector that's responsible for producing goods and services that actually meet people's needs and wants. So, the private components of the economy have the most significant effect on people's economic well-being.

Recently, government spending and hiring has accounted for a larger than normal share of both economic activity and employment. This means the government is propping up these traditional measures, making the economy appear better than it actually is. Also, many of the jobs Biden and his allies take credit for creating will quickly go away once it becomes clear that consumers don't actually want whatever the government encouraged these companies to produce.

On top of all that, the administration is dealing with the consequences of their chosen inflation rhetoric.

Since its peak in the summer of 2022, the president's team has talked about inflation "coming back down," which can easily give the impression that it's prices that will eventually come back down.

But that's not what that phrase means. It would be more honest to say that price increases are slowing down.

Americans are finally waking up to the fact that the cost of living will not return to prepandemic levels, and they're not happy about it.

The president has made some clumsy attempts at damage control, such as a Super Bowl Sunday video attacking food companies for "shrinkflation"—selling smaller portions at the same price instead of simply raising prices.

In his speech Thursday, Biden is expected to play up his desire to crack down on the "corporate greed" he's blaming for high prices.

In the name of "bringing down costs for Americans," the administration wants to implement targeted price ceilings - something anyone who has taken even a single economics class could tell you does more harm than good. Biden would never place the blame for the dramatic price increases we've experienced during his term where it actually belongs—on all the government spending that he and President Donald Trump oversaw during the pandemic, funded by the creation of $6 trillion out of thin air - because that kind of spending is precisely what he hopes to kick back up in a second term.

If reelected, the president wants to "revive" parts of his so-called Build Back Better agenda, which he tried and failed to pass in his first year. That would bring a significant expansion of domestic spending. And Biden remains committed to the idea that Americans must be forced to continue funding the war in Ukraine. That's another topic Biden is expected to highlight in the State of the Union, likely accompanied by the lie that Ukraine spending is good for the American economy. It isn't.

It's not possible to predict all the ways President Biden will exaggerate, mislead, and outright lie in his speech on Thursday. But we can be sure of two things. The "state of the Union" is not as strong as Biden will say it is. And his policy ambitions risk making it much worse.

*  *  *

The American people will be tuning in on their smartphones, laptops, and televisions on Thursday evening to see if 'sloppy joe' 81-year-old President Joe Biden can coherently put together more than two sentences (even with a teleprompter) as he gives his third State of the Union in front of a divided Congress. 

President Biden will speak on various topics to convince voters why he shouldn't be sent to a retirement home.

According to CNN sources, here are some of the topics Biden will discuss tonight:

  • Economic issues: Biden and his team have been drafting a speech heavy on economic populism, aides said, with calls for higher taxes on corporations and the wealthy – an attempt to draw a sharp contrast with Republicans and their likely presidential nominee, Donald Trump.

  • Health care expenses: Biden will also push for lowering health care costs and discuss his efforts to go after drug manufacturers to lower the cost of prescription medications — all issues his advisers believe can help buoy what have been sagging economic approval ratings.

  • Israel's war with Hamas: Also looming large over Biden's primetime address is the ongoing Israel-Hamas war, which has consumed much of the president's time and attention over the past few months. The president's top national security advisers have been working around the clock to try to finalize a ceasefire-hostages release deal by Ramadan, the Muslim holy month that begins next week.

  • An argument for reelection: Aides view Thursday's speech as a critical opportunity for the president to tout his accomplishments in office and lay out his plans for another four years in the nation's top job. Even though viewership has declined over the years, the yearly speech reliably draws tens of millions of households.

Sources provided more color on Biden's SOTU address: 

The speech is expected to be heavy on economic populism. The president will talk about raising taxes on corporations and the wealthy. He'll highlight efforts to cut costs for the American people, including pushing Congress to help make prescription drugs more affordable.

Biden will talk about the need to preserve democracy and freedom, a cornerstone of his re-election bid. That includes protecting and bolstering reproductive rights, an issue Democrats believe will energize voters in November. Biden is also expected to promote his unity agenda, a key feature of each of his addresses to Congress while in office.

Biden is also expected to give remarks on border security while the invasion of illegals has become one of the most heated topics among American voters. A majority of voters are frustrated with radical progressives in the White House facilitating the illegal migrant invasion. 

It is probable that the president will attribute the failure of the Senate border bill to the Republicans, a claim many voters view as unfounded. This is because the White House has the option to issue an executive order to restore border security, yet opts not to do so

Maybe this is why? 

While Biden addresses the nation, the Biden administration will be armed with a social media team to pump propaganda to at least 100 million Americans. 

"The White House hosted about 70 creators, digital publishers, and influencers across three separate events" on Wednesday and Thursday, a White House official told CNN. 

Not a very capable social media team... 

The administration's move to ramp up social media operations comes as users on X are mostly free from government censorship with Elon Musk at the helm. This infuriates Democrats, who can no longer censor their political enemies on X. 

Meanwhile, Democratic lawmakers tell Axios that the president's SOTU performance will be critical as he tries to dispel voter concerns about his elderly age. The address reached as many as 27 million people in 2023. 

"We are all nervous," said one House Democrat, citing concerns about the president's "ability to speak without blowing things."

The SOTU address comes as Biden's polling data is in the dumps

BetOnline has created several money-making opportunities for gamblers tonight, such as betting on what word Biden mentions the most. 

As well as...

We will update you when Tucker Carlson's live feed of SOTU is published. 

Tyler Durden Fri, 03/08/2024 - 07:44

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending