Uncategorized
A Turning Point in Wage Growth?
The surge in wage growth experienced by the U.S. economy over the past two years is showing some tentative signs of moderation. In this post, we take a…

The surge in wage growth experienced by the U.S. economy over the past two years is showing some tentative signs of moderation. In this post, we take a closer look at the underlying data by estimating a model designed to isolate the persistent component—or trend—of wage growth. Our central finding is that this trend may have peaked in early 2022, having experienced an earlier rise and subsequent moderation that were broad-based across sectors. We also find that wage growth seems to be moderating more slowly than the trend in services inflation.
Has Wage Growth Started to Moderate?
Our model decomposes wage growth in each sector of the economy into the sum of a persistent component common to all sectors, a persistent component specific to that sector, and some transitory shocks. Through this decomposition, we can assess whether the sharp increase in wage growth experienced by the U.S. economy over the past two years is broad-based or driven by specific sectors. This sectoral approach is motivated by the substantial reallocation of workers across different sectors of the economy triggered by the pandemic, which is likely to have affected aggregate wage growth.
The model is estimated using monthly data on nominal wages from the Current Population Survey (CPS). Following the well-established approach of the Atlanta Fed Wage Growth Tracker, we define wage growth as the median percent change in the hourly wage of individuals, observed twelve months apart. An attractive feature of this definition is that aggregate wage growth can be readily decomposed by job or demographic characteristics. In this blog post, we break down aggregate changes in nominal wages into seven sectors of the economy.
Extending a model that we recently used to measure the persistence of inflation, we recover the trend in unobserved monthly wage growth from year-over-year wage changes. This technical adjustment accommodates the structure of the CPS data while ensuring that the model is not putting too much weight on past data, which would artificially delay a potential turning point in the trend.
The chart below shows our estimated trend (solid blue line) together with the realized twelve-month wage growth defined as described above (dashed black line). The shaded area around the trend is a 68 percent confidence band that captures the uncertainty associated with the estimate. We highlight two main takeaways.
Wage Growth and Its Persistent Component

First, the trend remained stable between 3.2 percent and 3.7 percent between 2016 and 2020. Hence, most fluctuations in observed wage growth over that period, including those in the first part of the pandemic, can be ascribed to transitory shocks. Starting in early 2021, the trend increased markedly, nearly doubling over the course of the year. As such, a large chunk of the wage growth we saw over the course of 2021 appears to be persistent. It is worth stressing once more that the trend extracted by the model is expressed in terms of annualized monthly wage growth, which explains why it leads the actual year-over-year wage growth series in the chart.
Second, the model suggests that the trend may have peaked in the early months of 2022, then started to decline. But, as shown by the shaded areas, there remains considerable uncertainty around the pace of this slowdown in the trend component of wage growth. If anything, our model estimates indicate that it cannot be ruled out that wage growth will continue to be markedly higher in the near term than it was before the pandemic. We next turn to investigating which sectors contributed the most to the increase in the persistent component of wage growth, and how widespread the recent moderation is.
Is the Persistence of Wage Growth Driven by Specific Sectors?
We retrieve the persistent components for the seven broad sectors that are featured in our analysis and then recover the incidence of each of these sectors on the aggregate. This allows us to evaluate the role that these different sectors played in the recent evolution of wage growth, as shown in the chart below. We allocate the cumulative change in trend wage growth to each sector (measured by the deviation from the average 2017-19 level of the aggregate trend).
Sectoral Decomposition of Persistence in Wage Growth

While sectors differ in terms of their contribution to the persistence of wage growth, the surge observed in 2021 is broad-based. Three industries moved first and contributed to more than half of the observed aggregate increase: education and health, finance and business services, and trade and transportation. Interestingly, leisure and hospitality had a relatively small contribution to the overall trend dynamics. While the estimated trend specific to that sector has gone up, this increase has been limited.
Since early 2022, most sectors have shown a deceleration, if not a fall, in the persistent component of wage growth. No specific sector, however, seems to be behind the recent decline in the overall trend component. In addition, the decline in persistence in some sectors, such as trade and transportation, recently stalled or even reverted. All in all, this suggests that focusing on specific sectors of the economy is not particularly helpful in explaining the persistence of wage growth, but a more comprehensive approach is needed, as we expand on next.
How Widespread Are Trend Dynamics?
While some sectors played a bigger role in the earlier increase and subsequent deceleration of the aggregate trend in wage growth, these changes appear widespread across the economy. In the chart below, we distinguish between changes in trend that are common across sectors and changes in trend that are specific to each sector. Like the sectoral breakdown shown above, the common and sector-specific wage growth trends are shown in deviation from their respective average over 2017-19.
Persistence of Wage Growth: Common or Sector-Specific Trend?

The increase in trend wage growth witnessed in 2021 is clearly driven by the common component, which accounts for more than two-third of the increase. The deceleration in trend wage growth taking place over 2022 is also entirely driven by the same common component. Looking ahead, it is unclear whether the common trend component of wage growth will keep decreasing, because the estimates for late 2022 suggest that the pace of this decline has slowed. Adding to this concern, the sum of the sector-specific trend components (the blue area in the chart above) has also plateaued in the last year and has not shown signs of reversal yet.
What Are the Implications of Persistent Wage Growth?
Despite the very obvious benefits of wage growth, the persistence of the recent increase in wage growth is potentially cause for concern because it may become incompatible with price stability. Wage growth is often thought to feed back into price hikes in labor-intensive sectors, and this pass-through may have increased during the pandemic. In the chart below, we inspect how the trend in wage growth relates to the trend in price inflation in core services (excluding housing) recovered from PCE data. Both trends are estimated using the methodology described earlier, so their timing can be compared as they are both expressed in terms of annualized monthly growth.
Persistence in Wage Growth and Services Inflation

Interestingly, our results not only suggest that the persistent component of core services inflation started to increase before trend wage growth did, but also show that it has come down faster, despite the fact that both trends peaked around the beginning of 2022. Persistent services inflation markedly slowed down between June and October, although it seems to have levelled off since. A further deceleration in trend wage growth may ease inflationary pressures, but considerable uncertainty about the speed of this decline remains.
Martín Almuzara is a research economist in Macroeconomic and Monetary Studies in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.
Richard Audoly is a research economist in Labor and Product Market Studies in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.
Davide Melcangi is a research economist in Labor and Product Market Studies in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.
How to cite this post:
Martin Almuzara, Richard Audoly, and Davide Melcangi, “A Turning Point in Wage Growth?,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York Liberty Street Economics, February 23, 2023, https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2023/02/a-turning-point-in-wage-growth/.
Disclaimer
The views expressed in this post are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the author(s).
Uncategorized
Gold Prices Reflect A Shift In Paradigm, Part 2
Gold Prices Reflect A Shift In Paradigm, Part 2
Authored by Alasdair Macleod via GoldMoney.com,
In the first part of this report, we highlighted…

Authored by Alasdair Macleod via GoldMoney.com,
In the first part of this report, we highlighted that observed gold prices have significantly detached from our model-predicted prices. While this has happened in the past, prices always converged eventually. However, the delta between the observed and the model predicted price has now reached a record high of around $400/ozt. We thus ask ourselves whether it is reasonable to expect that model-predicted and observed prices will converge again in the future, or, whether we witness a shift in paradigm and the model no longer works.
In our view, the only reason for gold prices to sustainably detach from the underlying variables in our gold price model is if central banks (particularly the Fed) lose control over the monetary environment. Thus, it seems that the gold market is now pricing in a significant risk that the Fed can’t get inflation back under control. As we highlighted in Part I of this report (Gold prices reflect a shift in paradigm – Part I, 15 March, 2023), this is happening in the most unlikely of all environments. The Fed has aggressively hiked rates at the fastest pace in over 50 years and it is signaling to the market that it will do whatever it takes to get inflation under control. So why is the gold market still concerned about inflation?
The issue is that so far, it has been easy for the Fed to raise rates sharply to combat inflation. Despite the sharp move in the Fed Funds rate, one may get the impression that nothing has happened yet that would jeopardize the Fed’s ability to raise rates even higher. For starters, the unemployment rate remains stubbornly low (see Exhibit 8).
Exhibit 8: The US unemployment rate remains stubbornly low despite the sharp rate hikes
Source: FRED, Goldmoney Research
Equity and bond prices have sharply corrected in the early phases of the Fed’s rate hike cycle, but since then equity markets have partially recovered their losses. While equity prices are not the real economy, large downward corrections can impact the real economy nevertheless due to the wealth effect. When people become less wealthy, they spend less, which in turn has an effect on the economy. The impact of this reduction in wealth might also not be meaningful so far as the correction came from extremely inflated levels. The S&P 500, for example, has corrected almost 20% from its peak, but it is still 14% higher than the pre-pandemic highs in 2019 (see Exhibit 9).
Exhibit 9: Even though US equity prices have corrected sharply, they are still well above the pre-pandemic highs….
Source: S&P, Goldmoney Research
The real estate market has slowed down significantly, but so far prices haven’t crashed (see Exhibit 10), and even though there are a lot of early warning signs, the Fed historically had only become concerned when a crumbling housing market started to affect the banks. While we certainly saw turmoil in the banking sector over the last few days, it was not related to the mortgage business so far.
Exhibit 10: …and home prices – despite the clear rollover – have not crashed yet
Source: S&P, Goldmoney Research
Hence, at first sight, it appears there is little reason for the gold market to price in a scenario where the Fed loses control over inflation. However, there are plenty of warning signs that things are about to change. In our view, the correction in the equity market is far from over. When the last two bubbles deflated, equities corrected a lot lower for longer (see Exhibit 11).
Exhibit 11: the last two bubbles saw much larger corrections in equity prices
Source: S&P, Goldmoney Research
This alone will start to put a strain on the disposable income of not just American consumers, but globally. We are seeing signs of this in all kinds of markets. For example, used car prices had skyrocketed until about a year ago on the back of supply chain issues combined with excess disposable income. But since the Fed started raising rates, used car prices have retreated somewhat (see Exhibit 12). Arguably this is good for people wanting to buy a car with cash, and it will also have a dampening effect on inflation numbers, but the reason for it is not that all the sudden a lot more cars are being produced, but that higher rates make it more expensive to finance cars, and thus demand is weakening.
Exhibit 12: Manheim used car index
Source: Bloomberg, Goldmoney Research
Certain aspects of the housing market also show more signs of stress than the correction in real estate prices alone suggests. For example, lumber prices have completely crashed from their spectacular all-time highs and are now back to pre-pandemic levels (see Exhibit 13).
Exhibit 13: Lumber prices have come back to earth
Source: Goldmoney Research
Similar to the development in the used car market, while this may be good for people trying to build a new home, it is indicative of the material slowdown in construction activity. This can be directly observed in housing data. New housing starts are 28% lower than in spring 2022 (See Exhibit 14).
Exhibit 14: New Housing Start data shows a material slowdown in construction activity
Source: FRED, Goldmoney Research
Moreover, mortgage costs have exploded. A 10-year fixed mortgage went from 2.5% a year ago to 6.3% now (see Exhibit 15). This will undoubtedly dampen the appetite for home purchases and strain disposable income as previously fixed mortgages must be rolled over. Given current mortgage rates, it is surprising that the housing market has not yet corrected a lot more.
Exhibit 15: Mortgage rates have exploded over the past 12 months
Source: Bankrate.com, Goldmoney Research
There is a myriad of other indicators, from crashing freight rates (see Exhibit 16) to layoffs in the trucking and technology sector as well as languishing oil prices despite record outages and inventories, that indicate that the Feds (and increasingly other central banks) ultra-hawkish policy is impacting the real economy, both domestic and globally.
Exhibit 16: Freight rates had skyrocketed in the aftermath of the Covid19 Pandemic but are now back to normal
Source: Goldmoney Research
The result will be a period of global economic contraction. The Fed may view this decline in inflation as confirmation that their policies are working to fight inflation, even though it will only reflect a crashing economy. Importantly, once the recession kicks in, we will soon see rising unemployment. Once unemployment starts rising, the Fed will have to slow down its rate hikes and eventually stop. However, the underlying cause of inflation – over 8 trillion in asset buying by the Fed – will only have reversed a tiny bit by that point. This means that once the fed will have to make a decision, to either fight unemployment or inflation.
We believe that the most likely explanation for the recent rally in gold prices against the underlying drivers of our model is that the market is increasingly pricing in that the Fed, once it is forced to stop hiking, will lose control over inflation. Faced with the choices of years of high unemployment and a crumbling economy or persistent high inflation, the gold market thinks the Fed will opt for the latter. This would mark a true paradigm shift, and from that point on, gold prices may start to price in prolonged high inflation (and our model may not be able to capture this properly).
The crash of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) a few days ago has created significant turmoil in financial markets. While the Fed jumped in and announced a new lending program that effectively bailed out the bank, it also led to a sharp change in market expectations for the Fed. Before the bailout, Fed fund futures implied that the market expected several more Fed hikes this year, and only a gradual easing thereafter. One week later and the market is now pricing in that the Fed will only hike until May, and then pivot and start cutting rates (see Exhibit 17).
Exhibit 17: The crash and subsequent bailout of SBV led to a sharp reassessment of the Fed’s ability to raise rates
Source: Goldmoney Research
The gold market is still pricing in a much more dire outlook with higher and persistent long-term inflation Only time will tell whether this view is correct. In our opinion, it is quite forward-looking, and gold seems to be the only market that is that forward-looking at the moment. 10-year implied inflation in TIPS, for example, is at a laughably low 2.2%. For the model-predicted prices to match observed gold prices, 10-year implied inflation would have to be around 1.5% higher, at 3.75%. This doesn’t seem to be completely unfeasible. However, even if the gold market turns out to be ultimately correct, it will take a while until the rest of the market agrees with that view, and most likely there will be a period of sharply declining realized inflation in the meantime. That said, as equities look even more fragile in this scenario, and bonds and cash are unpopular asset classes during periods of high inflation, gold may simply be the only game in town until its time as the ultimate inflation hedge is coming.
Uncategorized
Australian Banking Association’s cost of living inquiry reveals bank pressure
An analysis of the rising inflation and concurrent collapse of Silicon Valley Bank proved that more than 186 banks in the U.S. are at risk of a similar…

An analysis of the rising inflation and concurrent collapse of Silicon Valley Bank proved that more than 186 banks in the U.S. are at risk of a similar shutdown if depositors decide to withdraw all funds.
The trade association for the Australian banking industry — the Australian Banking Association (ABA) — launched a cost of living inquiry to closely study the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, global supply chain constraints, geopolitical tensions and more on Australians.
An analysis of the rising inflation and concurrent collapse of three major traditional banks — Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), Silvergate Bank and Signature Bank — recently proved that more than 186 banks in the U.S. are at risk of a similar shutdown if depositors decide to withdraw all funds. The ABA’s inquiry aims to identify ways to ease the cost of living in Australia and the Government’s fiscal policy response.

ABA acknowledged that many Australians would struggle to adjust to a higher cost of living, while it may be easier for some, adding that:
“The ABA notes most customers will manage the higher cost of living and their mortgage commitments by changing their spending patterns, applying their accumulated savings to their higher repayments in anticipation of higher borrowing rates, or refinancing their mortgage.”
One of the most significant pressures for banks was when citizens rolled over from a fixed-rate mortgage to a variable rate. However, ABA urged customers to be proactive and ensure they are getting the best deal for their banking services.

Property rent across Australia has also witnessed a steady increase as markets normalized following the end of COVID-19 restrictions. Citizens experiencing financial difficulty can contact their banks and get help, including fees and charges waivers, emergency credit limit increases and deferral of scheduled loan repayments, to name a few.
Related: National Australia Bank makes first-ever cross-border stablecoin transaction
Alongside this attempt to cushion Australians against rising fiat inflation, the Reserve Bank of Australia and the Department of the Treasury have been holding private meetings with executives from Coinbase, with discussions revolving around the future of crypto regulation in Australia.
Consultation open! Today we released the token mapping consultation paper. This consultation is part of a multi step reform agenda to develop an appropriate regulatory setting for the #crypto sector. Read paper & submit views @ https://t.co/4W2msjhP9B @ASIC_Connect @AUSTRAC pic.twitter.com/OGHuZEGvDp
— Australian Treasury (@Treasury_AU) February 2, 2023
Cointelegraph confirmed from an RBA spokesperson that Coinbase met with the RBA’s payments policy and financial stability departments in mid-March “as part of the Bank’s ongoing liaison with industry.”
crypto pandemic covid-19 cryptoUncategorized
Fed, central banks enhance ‘swap lines’ to combat banking crisis
Currency swap lines have been used during times of crisis in the past, such as the 2008 global financial crisis and the 2020 coronavirus pandemic.
…

Currency swap lines have been used during times of crisis in the past, such as the 2008 global financial crisis and the 2020 coronavirus pandemic.
The United States Federal Reserve has announced a coordinated effort with five other central banks aimed at keeping the U.S. dollar flowing amid a series of banking blowups in the U.S. and in Europe.
The March 19 announcement from the U.S. Fed comes only a few hours after Swiss-based bank Credit Suisse was bought out by UBS for nearly $2 billion as part of an emergency plan led by Swiss authorities to preserve the country's financial stability.
According to the Federal Reserve Board, a plan to shore up liquidity conditions will be carried out through “swap lines” — an agreement between two central banks to exchange currencies.
Swap lines previously served as an emergency-like action for the Federal Reserve in the 2007-2008 global financial crisis and the 2020 response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Federal Reserve-initiated swap lines are designed to improve liquidity in dollar funding markets during tough economic conditions.
Coordinated central bank action to enhance the provision of U.S. dollar liquidity: https://t.co/Qs4cYY8BFO
— Federal Reserve (@federalreserve) March 19, 2023
"To improve the swap lines’ effectiveness in providing U.S. dollar funding, the central banks currently offering U.S. dollar operations have agreed to increase the frequency of seven-day maturity operations from weekly to daily," the Fed said in a statement.
The swap line network will include the Bank of Canada, Bank of England, Bank of Japan, European Central Bank and the Swiss National Bank. It will start on March 20 and continue at least until April 30.
The move also comes amid a negative outlook for the U.S. banking system, with Silvergate Bank and Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) collapsing and the New York District of Financial Services (NYDFS) takeover of Signature Bank.
The Federal Reserve however made no direct reference to the recent banking crisis in its statement. Instead, it explained that they implemented the swap line agreement to strengthen the supply of credit to households and businesses:
“The network of swap lines among these central banks is a set of available standing facilities and serve as an important liquidity backstop to ease strains in global funding markets, thereby helping to mitigate the effects of such strains on the supply of credit to households and businesses.”
The latest announcement from the Fed has sparked a debate about whether the arrangement constitutes quantitative easing.
U.S. economist Danielle DiMartino Booth argued however that the arrangements are unrelated to quantitative easing or inflation and that it does not "loosen" financial conditions:
MISINFORMATION PREVENTION MOMENT
— Danielle DiMartino Booth (@DiMartinoBooth) March 19, 2023
Swap lines do NOT constitute loosening financial conditions.
One more example: You're a doctor. A patient is having cardiac arrest. You can SEE the paddles to revive him/her but you can't REACH the paddles. These swap lines HAND you the paddles. https://t.co/RXOPiBmsif
The Federal Reserve has been working to prevent an escalation of the banking crisis.
Related: Banking crisis: What does it mean for crypto?
Last week, the Federal Reserve set up a $25 billion funding program to ensure banks have sufficient liquidity to cover customer needs amid tough market conditions.
A recent analysis by several economists on the SVB collapse found that up to 186 U.S. banks are at risk of insolvency:
“Even if only half of uninsured depositors decide to withdraw, almost 190 banks are at a potential risk of impairment to insured depositors, with potentially $300 billion of insured deposits at risk.”
Cointelegraph reached out to the Federal Reserve for comment but did not receive an immediate response.
currencies pandemic coronavirus covid-19 crypto-
Government12 hours ago
“True Stories… Could Fuel Hesitancy”: Stanford Project Worked To Censor Even True Stories On Social Media
-
Uncategorized8 hours ago
Fed, central banks enhance ‘swap lines’ to combat banking crisis
-
International6 hours ago
What Follows US Hegemony
-
International22 hours ago
The limits of expert judgment: Lessons from social science forecasting during the pandemic
-
International19 hours ago
Royal Caribbean Officially Makes Controversial Change
-
Government22 hours ago
Is The US Funding An Experiment In Digital Control In Ukraine?
-
Spread & Containment14 hours ago
“The New Normal”: New York To Lower Math And English Proficiency Standards Due To Poor Test Result
-
Uncategorized1 hour ago
Australian Banking Association’s cost of living inquiry reveals bank pressure